Cargando…

Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine

BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adler, Ava, Roth, Bradley, Lundy, Scott D., Takeshima, Teppei, Yumura, Yasushi, Kuroda, Shinnosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547
_version_ 1785129476224450560
author Adler, Ava
Roth, Bradley
Lundy, Scott D.
Takeshima, Teppei
Yumura, Yasushi
Kuroda, Shinnosuke
author_facet Adler, Ava
Roth, Bradley
Lundy, Scott D.
Takeshima, Teppei
Yumura, Yasushi
Kuroda, Shinnosuke
author_sort Adler, Ava
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing infertility show normal results in this test. From a genetic perspective, the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is important as a parameter of sperm quality. METHODS: In this narrative study, we review and discuss pathophysiological causes, DNA repair mechanisms, and management of high SDF. We then summarize literature exploring the association between SDF and reproductive outcomes. MAIN FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have revealed a significant association between high SDF in AMAB individuals and adverse reproductive outcomes including embryo development, natural conception, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. However, the association with live birth rates and pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection remains inconclusive. The disparities among quantitative assays, inconsistent reference range values, absent high‐quality prospective clinical trials, and clinical heterogeneity in AMAB patients with elevated SDF represent the main limitations affecting SDF testing. CONCLUSION: The evaluation and management of SDF plays an important role in a subset of AMAB infertility, but widespread integration into clinical guidelines will require future high‐quality clinical trials and assay standardization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10616814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106168142023-11-01 Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine Adler, Ava Roth, Bradley Lundy, Scott D. Takeshima, Teppei Yumura, Yasushi Kuroda, Shinnosuke Reprod Med Biol Reviews BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing infertility show normal results in this test. From a genetic perspective, the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is important as a parameter of sperm quality. METHODS: In this narrative study, we review and discuss pathophysiological causes, DNA repair mechanisms, and management of high SDF. We then summarize literature exploring the association between SDF and reproductive outcomes. MAIN FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have revealed a significant association between high SDF in AMAB individuals and adverse reproductive outcomes including embryo development, natural conception, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. However, the association with live birth rates and pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection remains inconclusive. The disparities among quantitative assays, inconsistent reference range values, absent high‐quality prospective clinical trials, and clinical heterogeneity in AMAB patients with elevated SDF represent the main limitations affecting SDF testing. CONCLUSION: The evaluation and management of SDF plays an important role in a subset of AMAB infertility, but widespread integration into clinical guidelines will require future high‐quality clinical trials and assay standardization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10616814/ /pubmed/37915974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Adler, Ava
Roth, Bradley
Lundy, Scott D.
Takeshima, Teppei
Yumura, Yasushi
Kuroda, Shinnosuke
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title_full Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title_fullStr Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title_full_unstemmed Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title_short Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
title_sort sperm dna fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547
work_keys_str_mv AT adlerava spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine
AT rothbradley spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine
AT lundyscottd spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine
AT takeshimateppei spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine
AT yumurayasushi spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine
AT kurodashinnosuke spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine