Cargando…
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine
BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547 |
_version_ | 1785129476224450560 |
---|---|
author | Adler, Ava Roth, Bradley Lundy, Scott D. Takeshima, Teppei Yumura, Yasushi Kuroda, Shinnosuke |
author_facet | Adler, Ava Roth, Bradley Lundy, Scott D. Takeshima, Teppei Yumura, Yasushi Kuroda, Shinnosuke |
author_sort | Adler, Ava |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing infertility show normal results in this test. From a genetic perspective, the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is important as a parameter of sperm quality. METHODS: In this narrative study, we review and discuss pathophysiological causes, DNA repair mechanisms, and management of high SDF. We then summarize literature exploring the association between SDF and reproductive outcomes. MAIN FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have revealed a significant association between high SDF in AMAB individuals and adverse reproductive outcomes including embryo development, natural conception, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. However, the association with live birth rates and pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection remains inconclusive. The disparities among quantitative assays, inconsistent reference range values, absent high‐quality prospective clinical trials, and clinical heterogeneity in AMAB patients with elevated SDF represent the main limitations affecting SDF testing. CONCLUSION: The evaluation and management of SDF plays an important role in a subset of AMAB infertility, but widespread integration into clinical guidelines will require future high‐quality clinical trials and assay standardization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10616814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106168142023-11-01 Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine Adler, Ava Roth, Bradley Lundy, Scott D. Takeshima, Teppei Yumura, Yasushi Kuroda, Shinnosuke Reprod Med Biol Reviews BACKGROUND: Approximately 8%–12% of couples worldwide face infertility, with infertility of individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) contributing to at least 50% of cases. Conventional semen analysis commonly used to detect sperm abnormalities is insufficient, as 30% of AMAB patients experiencing infertility show normal results in this test. From a genetic perspective, the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is important as a parameter of sperm quality. METHODS: In this narrative study, we review and discuss pathophysiological causes, DNA repair mechanisms, and management of high SDF. We then summarize literature exploring the association between SDF and reproductive outcomes. MAIN FINDINGS: Recent systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have revealed a significant association between high SDF in AMAB individuals and adverse reproductive outcomes including embryo development, natural conception, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. However, the association with live birth rates and pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection remains inconclusive. The disparities among quantitative assays, inconsistent reference range values, absent high‐quality prospective clinical trials, and clinical heterogeneity in AMAB patients with elevated SDF represent the main limitations affecting SDF testing. CONCLUSION: The evaluation and management of SDF plays an important role in a subset of AMAB infertility, but widespread integration into clinical guidelines will require future high‐quality clinical trials and assay standardization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10616814/ /pubmed/37915974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Adler, Ava Roth, Bradley Lundy, Scott D. Takeshima, Teppei Yumura, Yasushi Kuroda, Shinnosuke Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title_full | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title_fullStr | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title_short | Sperm DNA fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
title_sort | sperm dna fragmentation testing in clinical management of reproductive medicine |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adlerava spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine AT rothbradley spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine AT lundyscottd spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine AT takeshimateppei spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine AT yumurayasushi spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine AT kurodashinnosuke spermdnafragmentationtestinginclinicalmanagementofreproductivemedicine |