Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study

BACKGROUND: Based on the lack of literature to support any treatment strategy in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment, a prospective study randomizing patients between surgery and conservative treatment is warranted. Since studies comparing surgery to no surgery are often challen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oosterbos, Christophe, Rummens, Sofie, Bogaerts, Kris, Van Hoylandt, Anaïs, Hoornaert, Sophie, Weyns, Frank, Dubuisson, Annie, Ceuppens, Jeroen, Schuind, Sophie, Groen, Justus L, Lemmens, Robin, Theys, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01407-x
_version_ 1785129516528566272
author Oosterbos, Christophe
Rummens, Sofie
Bogaerts, Kris
Van Hoylandt, Anaïs
Hoornaert, Sophie
Weyns, Frank
Dubuisson, Annie
Ceuppens, Jeroen
Schuind, Sophie
Groen, Justus L
Lemmens, Robin
Theys, Tom
author_facet Oosterbos, Christophe
Rummens, Sofie
Bogaerts, Kris
Van Hoylandt, Anaïs
Hoornaert, Sophie
Weyns, Frank
Dubuisson, Annie
Ceuppens, Jeroen
Schuind, Sophie
Groen, Justus L
Lemmens, Robin
Theys, Tom
author_sort Oosterbos, Christophe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on the lack of literature to support any treatment strategy in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment, a prospective study randomizing patients between surgery and conservative treatment is warranted. Since studies comparing surgery to no surgery are often challenging, we first examined the feasibility of such a randomized controlled trial. METHODS/DESIGN: An internal feasibility pilot study was conducted to assess several aspects of process, resource, management, and scientific feasibility. The main objective was the assessment of the recruitment rate. The criterion to embark on a full study was the recruitment of at least 14 patients in 6 participating centers within 6 months. Cross-over rate, blinding measures, training strategies, and trial assessments were evaluated. The trial was entirely funded by the KCE Trials public funding program of the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (ID KCE19-1232). RESULTS: The initial duration was prolonged due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Between April 2021 and October 2022, we included 19 patients of which 15 were randomized. Fourteen patients were treated as randomized. One drop-out occurred after randomization, prior to surgery. We did not document any cross-over or accidental unblinding. Training strategies were successful. Patients perceived the quality of life questionnaire as the least relevant assessment. Assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion was prone to interobserver variability. All other trial assessments were adequate. DISCUSSION: Recruitment of the anticipated 14 patients was feasible although slower than expected. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will no longer be included in the full-scale FOOTDROP trial. CONCLUSION: The FOOTDROP study is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04695834. Registered 4 January 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01407-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10617035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106170352023-11-01 A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study Oosterbos, Christophe Rummens, Sofie Bogaerts, Kris Van Hoylandt, Anaïs Hoornaert, Sophie Weyns, Frank Dubuisson, Annie Ceuppens, Jeroen Schuind, Sophie Groen, Justus L Lemmens, Robin Theys, Tom Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Based on the lack of literature to support any treatment strategy in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment, a prospective study randomizing patients between surgery and conservative treatment is warranted. Since studies comparing surgery to no surgery are often challenging, we first examined the feasibility of such a randomized controlled trial. METHODS/DESIGN: An internal feasibility pilot study was conducted to assess several aspects of process, resource, management, and scientific feasibility. The main objective was the assessment of the recruitment rate. The criterion to embark on a full study was the recruitment of at least 14 patients in 6 participating centers within 6 months. Cross-over rate, blinding measures, training strategies, and trial assessments were evaluated. The trial was entirely funded by the KCE Trials public funding program of the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (ID KCE19-1232). RESULTS: The initial duration was prolonged due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Between April 2021 and October 2022, we included 19 patients of which 15 were randomized. Fourteen patients were treated as randomized. One drop-out occurred after randomization, prior to surgery. We did not document any cross-over or accidental unblinding. Training strategies were successful. Patients perceived the quality of life questionnaire as the least relevant assessment. Assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion was prone to interobserver variability. All other trial assessments were adequate. DISCUSSION: Recruitment of the anticipated 14 patients was feasible although slower than expected. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and assessment of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will no longer be included in the full-scale FOOTDROP trial. CONCLUSION: The FOOTDROP study is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04695834. Registered 4 January 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01407-x. BioMed Central 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10617035/ /pubmed/37908016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01407-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Oosterbos, Christophe
Rummens, Sofie
Bogaerts, Kris
Van Hoylandt, Anaïs
Hoornaert, Sophie
Weyns, Frank
Dubuisson, Annie
Ceuppens, Jeroen
Schuind, Sophie
Groen, Justus L
Lemmens, Robin
Theys, Tom
A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment: results of an internal feasibility pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01407-x
work_keys_str_mv AT oosterboschristophe arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT rummenssofie arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT bogaertskris arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT vanhoylandtanais arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT hoornaertsophie arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT weynsfrank arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT dubuissonannie arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT ceuppensjeroen arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT schuindsophie arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT groenjustusl arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT lemmensrobin arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT theystom arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT oosterboschristophe randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT rummenssofie randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT bogaertskris randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT vanhoylandtanais randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT hoornaertsophie randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT weynsfrank randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT dubuissonannie randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT ceuppensjeroen randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT schuindsophie randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT groenjustusl randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT lemmensrobin randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy
AT theystom randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentinpatientswithfootdropduetoperonealnerveentrapmentresultsofaninternalfeasibilitypilotstudy