Cargando…

A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol

BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon tenotomy is an integral part of the Ponseti method, aimed at correcting residual equinus and lack of dorsiflexion after correction of the adductus deformity in clubfoot. Percutaneous tenotomy using a number 15 scalpel blade is considered the gold standard, resulting in ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pigeolet, Manon, Ghufran Syed, Jabbar, Ahmed, Sadia, Chinoy, Muhammad Amin, Khan, Mansoor Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07728-9
_version_ 1785129524440072192
author Pigeolet, Manon
Ghufran Syed, Jabbar
Ahmed, Sadia
Chinoy, Muhammad Amin
Khan, Mansoor Ali
author_facet Pigeolet, Manon
Ghufran Syed, Jabbar
Ahmed, Sadia
Chinoy, Muhammad Amin
Khan, Mansoor Ali
author_sort Pigeolet, Manon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon tenotomy is an integral part of the Ponseti method, aimed at correcting residual equinus and lack of dorsiflexion after correction of the adductus deformity in clubfoot. Percutaneous tenotomy using a number 15 scalpel blade is considered the gold standard, resulting in excellent results with minimal complications. The use of a large-bore needle to perform Achilles tendon tenotomies has been described in literature, but a large-scale randomized controlled trial is currently lacking. In this trial, we aim to show the non-inferiority of the needle tenotomy technique compared to the gold standard blade tenotomy technique. METHODS: We will randomize 244 feet into group A: needle tenotomy or group B: blade tenotomy. Randomization will be done using a block randomization with random block sizes and applying a 1:1 allocation to achieve an intervention and control group of the exact same size. Children will be evaluated at 3 weeks and 3 months post-tenotomy for primary and secondary clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome will be the range of dorsiflexion obtained the secondary clinical outcomes will be frequency of minor and major complications and Pirani score. The non-inferiority margin was set at 4°, and thus, the null hypothesis of inferiority of the needle technique will be rejected if the mean difference between both techniques is less than 4°. The statistical analysis will use a multi-level mixed effects linear regression model for the primary outcomes and a multi-level mixed effects logistic regression model for the secondary clinical outcomes. The physician performing the evaluations post-tenotomy will be the only one blinded to group allocation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04897100 on 21 May 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07728-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10617068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106170682023-11-01 A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol Pigeolet, Manon Ghufran Syed, Jabbar Ahmed, Sadia Chinoy, Muhammad Amin Khan, Mansoor Ali Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon tenotomy is an integral part of the Ponseti method, aimed at correcting residual equinus and lack of dorsiflexion after correction of the adductus deformity in clubfoot. Percutaneous tenotomy using a number 15 scalpel blade is considered the gold standard, resulting in excellent results with minimal complications. The use of a large-bore needle to perform Achilles tendon tenotomies has been described in literature, but a large-scale randomized controlled trial is currently lacking. In this trial, we aim to show the non-inferiority of the needle tenotomy technique compared to the gold standard blade tenotomy technique. METHODS: We will randomize 244 feet into group A: needle tenotomy or group B: blade tenotomy. Randomization will be done using a block randomization with random block sizes and applying a 1:1 allocation to achieve an intervention and control group of the exact same size. Children will be evaluated at 3 weeks and 3 months post-tenotomy for primary and secondary clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome will be the range of dorsiflexion obtained the secondary clinical outcomes will be frequency of minor and major complications and Pirani score. The non-inferiority margin was set at 4°, and thus, the null hypothesis of inferiority of the needle technique will be rejected if the mean difference between both techniques is less than 4°. The statistical analysis will use a multi-level mixed effects linear regression model for the primary outcomes and a multi-level mixed effects logistic regression model for the secondary clinical outcomes. The physician performing the evaluations post-tenotomy will be the only one blinded to group allocation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04897100 on 21 May 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07728-9. BioMed Central 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10617068/ /pubmed/37907927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07728-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pigeolet, Manon
Ghufran Syed, Jabbar
Ahmed, Sadia
Chinoy, Muhammad Amin
Khan, Mansoor Ali
A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title_full A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title_fullStr A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title_short A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an Achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
title_sort single-center, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy of a 22-gauge needle versus a 15 blade to perform an achilles tendon tenotomy in 244 clubfeet—study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07728-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pigeoletmanon asinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT ghufransyedjabbar asinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT ahmedsadia asinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT chinoymuhammadamin asinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT khanmansoorali asinglecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT pigeoletmanon singlecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT ghufransyedjabbar singlecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT ahmedsadia singlecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT chinoymuhammadamin singlecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol
AT khanmansoorali singlecentersingleblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritytrialtocomparetheefficacyofa22gaugeneedleversusa15bladetoperformanachillestendontenotomyin244clubfeetstudyprotocol