Cargando…
Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review
AIM: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate and summarise the measurement properties of nursing research competence instruments and provide a summary overview of the use of nursing research competence instruments. BACKGROUND: Increasing nursing research competence instruments have been devel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01572-7 |
_version_ | 1785129530068828160 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Yuting Huang, Hui Halili, Xirongguli Tang, Siyuan Chen, Qirong |
author_facet | Xia, Yuting Huang, Hui Halili, Xirongguli Tang, Siyuan Chen, Qirong |
author_sort | Xia, Yuting |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate and summarise the measurement properties of nursing research competence instruments and provide a summary overview of the use of nursing research competence instruments. BACKGROUND: Increasing nursing research competence instruments have been developed. However, a systematic review and evaluation of nursing research competence instruments is lacking. METHOD: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute updated methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Reviewers searched articles in Eight English databases and two Chinese databases between April 1st, 2022, and April 30th, 2022. An updated literature search was conducted between March 1st and March 4th, 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers, independently. A third reviewer was involved when consensus was needed. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology was used to evaluate the methodological quality and measurement properties of the nursing research competence instruments. RESULTS: Ten studies involving eight nursing research competence instruments were included. None of the existing instruments have assessed all measurement properties. A total of 177 empirical studies have utilized a nursing research competence instrument with tested measurement properties. CONCLUSION: ‘Self-evaluated Nursing Research Capacity of Questionnaire (refined)’ was identified as the most appropriate nursing research competence instrument in existing instruments. However, reviewers need to conduct further measurement properties studies on the existing nursing research competence instruments. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NURSING POLICY: This study could guide the selection of appropriate nursing research competence instruments which could help to evaluate the nursing research competence of nurses and inform the development of intervention plans to enhance nursing research competence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01572-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10617091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106170912023-11-01 Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review Xia, Yuting Huang, Hui Halili, Xirongguli Tang, Siyuan Chen, Qirong BMC Nurs Research AIM: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate and summarise the measurement properties of nursing research competence instruments and provide a summary overview of the use of nursing research competence instruments. BACKGROUND: Increasing nursing research competence instruments have been developed. However, a systematic review and evaluation of nursing research competence instruments is lacking. METHOD: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute updated methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Reviewers searched articles in Eight English databases and two Chinese databases between April 1st, 2022, and April 30th, 2022. An updated literature search was conducted between March 1st and March 4th, 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers, independently. A third reviewer was involved when consensus was needed. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology was used to evaluate the methodological quality and measurement properties of the nursing research competence instruments. RESULTS: Ten studies involving eight nursing research competence instruments were included. None of the existing instruments have assessed all measurement properties. A total of 177 empirical studies have utilized a nursing research competence instrument with tested measurement properties. CONCLUSION: ‘Self-evaluated Nursing Research Capacity of Questionnaire (refined)’ was identified as the most appropriate nursing research competence instrument in existing instruments. However, reviewers need to conduct further measurement properties studies on the existing nursing research competence instruments. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NURSING POLICY: This study could guide the selection of appropriate nursing research competence instruments which could help to evaluate the nursing research competence of nurses and inform the development of intervention plans to enhance nursing research competence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01572-7. BioMed Central 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10617091/ /pubmed/37907869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01572-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Xia, Yuting Huang, Hui Halili, Xirongguli Tang, Siyuan Chen, Qirong Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title | Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title_full | Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title_fullStr | Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title_short | Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a COSMIN-based scoping review |
title_sort | instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a cosmin-based scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01572-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiayuting instrumentsformeasuringnursingresearchcompetenceacosminbasedscopingreview AT huanghui instrumentsformeasuringnursingresearchcompetenceacosminbasedscopingreview AT halilixirongguli instrumentsformeasuringnursingresearchcompetenceacosminbasedscopingreview AT tangsiyuan instrumentsformeasuringnursingresearchcompetenceacosminbasedscopingreview AT chenqirong instrumentsformeasuringnursingresearchcompetenceacosminbasedscopingreview |