Cargando…
Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction
Background: YouTube is currently the most popular online platform and is increasingly being utilized by patients as a resource on aesthetic surgery. Yet, its content is largely unregulated and this may result in dissemination of unreliable and inaccurate information. The objective of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211064382 |
_version_ | 1785129602575761408 |
---|---|
author | Chawla, Sahil Ding, Jeffrey Mazhar, Leena Khosa, Faisal |
author_facet | Chawla, Sahil Ding, Jeffrey Mazhar, Leena Khosa, Faisal |
author_sort | Chawla, Sahil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: YouTube is currently the most popular online platform and is increasingly being utilized by patients as a resource on aesthetic surgery. Yet, its content is largely unregulated and this may result in dissemination of unreliable and inaccurate information. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube liposuction content available to potential patients. Methods: YouTube was screened using the keywords: “liposuction,” “lipoplasty,” and “body sculpting.” The top 50 results for each term were screened for relevance. Videos which met the inclusion criteria were scored using the Global Quality Score (GQS) for educational value and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria for video reliability. Educational value, reliability, video views, likes, dislikes, duration and publishing date were compared between authorship groups, high/low reliability, and high/low educational value. Results: A total of 150 videos were screened, of which 89 videos met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the videos had low reliability (mean JAMA score = 2.78, SD = 1.15) and low educational value (mean GQS score = 3.55, SD = 1.31). Videos uploaded by physicians accounted for 83.1% percent of included videos and had a higher mean educational value and reliability score than those by patients. Video views, likes, dislikes, comments, popularity, and length were significantly greater in videos with high reliability. Conclusions: To ensure liposuction-seeking patients are appropriately educated and informed, surgeons and their patients may benefit from an analysis of educational quality and reliability of such online content. Surgeons may wish to discuss online sources of information with patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10617453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106174532023-11-01 Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction Chawla, Sahil Ding, Jeffrey Mazhar, Leena Khosa, Faisal Plast Surg (Oakv) Original Articles Background: YouTube is currently the most popular online platform and is increasingly being utilized by patients as a resource on aesthetic surgery. Yet, its content is largely unregulated and this may result in dissemination of unreliable and inaccurate information. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube liposuction content available to potential patients. Methods: YouTube was screened using the keywords: “liposuction,” “lipoplasty,” and “body sculpting.” The top 50 results for each term were screened for relevance. Videos which met the inclusion criteria were scored using the Global Quality Score (GQS) for educational value and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria for video reliability. Educational value, reliability, video views, likes, dislikes, duration and publishing date were compared between authorship groups, high/low reliability, and high/low educational value. Results: A total of 150 videos were screened, of which 89 videos met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the videos had low reliability (mean JAMA score = 2.78, SD = 1.15) and low educational value (mean GQS score = 3.55, SD = 1.31). Videos uploaded by physicians accounted for 83.1% percent of included videos and had a higher mean educational value and reliability score than those by patients. Video views, likes, dislikes, comments, popularity, and length were significantly greater in videos with high reliability. Conclusions: To ensure liposuction-seeking patients are appropriately educated and informed, surgeons and their patients may benefit from an analysis of educational quality and reliability of such online content. Surgeons may wish to discuss online sources of information with patients. SAGE Publications 2021-12-06 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10617453/ /pubmed/37915348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211064382 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chawla, Sahil Ding, Jeffrey Mazhar, Leena Khosa, Faisal Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title | Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title_full | Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title_fullStr | Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title_full_unstemmed | Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title_short | Entering the Misinformation Age: Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Liposuction |
title_sort | entering the misinformation age: quality and reliability of youtube for patient information on liposuction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503211064382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chawlasahil enteringthemisinformationagequalityandreliabilityofyoutubeforpatientinformationonliposuction AT dingjeffrey enteringthemisinformationagequalityandreliabilityofyoutubeforpatientinformationonliposuction AT mazharleena enteringthemisinformationagequalityandreliabilityofyoutubeforpatientinformationonliposuction AT khosafaisal enteringthemisinformationagequalityandreliabilityofyoutubeforpatientinformationonliposuction |