Cargando…

Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets

BACKGROUND: The effective reproduction number (Rt) quantifies the average number of secondary cases caused by one person with an infectious disease. Near-real-time monitoring of Rt during an outbreak is a major indicator used to monitor changes in disease transmission and assess the effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonaldi, Christophe, Fouillet, Anne, Sommen, Cécile, Lévy-Bruhl, Daniel, Paireau, Juliette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293585
_version_ 1785129636440571904
author Bonaldi, Christophe
Fouillet, Anne
Sommen, Cécile
Lévy-Bruhl, Daniel
Paireau, Juliette
author_facet Bonaldi, Christophe
Fouillet, Anne
Sommen, Cécile
Lévy-Bruhl, Daniel
Paireau, Juliette
author_sort Bonaldi, Christophe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effective reproduction number (Rt) quantifies the average number of secondary cases caused by one person with an infectious disease. Near-real-time monitoring of Rt during an outbreak is a major indicator used to monitor changes in disease transmission and assess the effectiveness of interventions. The estimation of Rt usually requires the identification of infected cases in the population, which can prove challenging with the available data, especially when asymptomatic people or with mild symptoms are not usually screened. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analysis of Rt estimates for COVID-19 surveillance in France based on three data sources with different sensitivities and specificities for identifying infected cases. METHODS: We applied a statistical method developed by Cori et al. to estimate Rt using (1) confirmed cases identified from positive virological tests in the population, (2) suspected cases recorded by a national network of emergency departments, and (3) COVID-19 hospital admissions recorded by a national administrative system to manage hospital organization. RESULTS: Rt estimates in France from May 27, 2020, to August 12, 2022, showed similar temporal trends regardless of the dataset. Estimates based on the daily number of confirmed cases provided an earlier signal than the two other sources, with an average lag of 3 and 6 days for estimates based on emergency department visits and hospital admissions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 experience confirmed that monitoring temporal changes in Rt was a key indicator to help the public health authorities control the outbreak in real time. However, gaining access to data on all infected people in the population in order to estimate Rt is not straightforward in practice. As this analysis has shown, the opportunity to use more readily available data to estimate Rt trends, provided that it is highly correlated with the spread of infection, provides a practical solution for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and indeed any other epidemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10617725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106177252023-11-01 Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets Bonaldi, Christophe Fouillet, Anne Sommen, Cécile Lévy-Bruhl, Daniel Paireau, Juliette PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The effective reproduction number (Rt) quantifies the average number of secondary cases caused by one person with an infectious disease. Near-real-time monitoring of Rt during an outbreak is a major indicator used to monitor changes in disease transmission and assess the effectiveness of interventions. The estimation of Rt usually requires the identification of infected cases in the population, which can prove challenging with the available data, especially when asymptomatic people or with mild symptoms are not usually screened. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analysis of Rt estimates for COVID-19 surveillance in France based on three data sources with different sensitivities and specificities for identifying infected cases. METHODS: We applied a statistical method developed by Cori et al. to estimate Rt using (1) confirmed cases identified from positive virological tests in the population, (2) suspected cases recorded by a national network of emergency departments, and (3) COVID-19 hospital admissions recorded by a national administrative system to manage hospital organization. RESULTS: Rt estimates in France from May 27, 2020, to August 12, 2022, showed similar temporal trends regardless of the dataset. Estimates based on the daily number of confirmed cases provided an earlier signal than the two other sources, with an average lag of 3 and 6 days for estimates based on emergency department visits and hospital admissions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 experience confirmed that monitoring temporal changes in Rt was a key indicator to help the public health authorities control the outbreak in real time. However, gaining access to data on all infected people in the population in order to estimate Rt is not straightforward in practice. As this analysis has shown, the opportunity to use more readily available data to estimate Rt trends, provided that it is highly correlated with the spread of infection, provides a practical solution for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and indeed any other epidemic. Public Library of Science 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10617725/ /pubmed/37906577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293585 Text en © 2023 Bonaldi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bonaldi, Christophe
Fouillet, Anne
Sommen, Cécile
Lévy-Bruhl, Daniel
Paireau, Juliette
Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title_full Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title_fullStr Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title_short Monitoring the reproductive number of COVID-19 in France: Comparative estimates from three datasets
title_sort monitoring the reproductive number of covid-19 in france: comparative estimates from three datasets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293585
work_keys_str_mv AT bonaldichristophe monitoringthereproductivenumberofcovid19infrancecomparativeestimatesfromthreedatasets
AT fouilletanne monitoringthereproductivenumberofcovid19infrancecomparativeestimatesfromthreedatasets
AT sommencecile monitoringthereproductivenumberofcovid19infrancecomparativeestimatesfromthreedatasets
AT levybruhldaniel monitoringthereproductivenumberofcovid19infrancecomparativeestimatesfromthreedatasets
AT paireaujuliette monitoringthereproductivenumberofcovid19infrancecomparativeestimatesfromthreedatasets