Cargando…

Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) plays an essential role in the diagnosis of seizures. EEG recording in children is done with partial sleep deprivation and sedative drugs. To compare the effectiveness of melatonin and chloral hydrate on sleep induction and EEG recording in children. MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fazli, Bahareh, Hosseini, Seyed-Ahmad, Behnampour, Nasser, Langari, Alale, Habibi-koolaee, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001140
_version_ 1785129677611859968
author Fazli, Bahareh
Hosseini, Seyed-Ahmad
Behnampour, Nasser
Langari, Alale
Habibi-koolaee, Mahdi
author_facet Fazli, Bahareh
Hosseini, Seyed-Ahmad
Behnampour, Nasser
Langari, Alale
Habibi-koolaee, Mahdi
author_sort Fazli, Bahareh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) plays an essential role in the diagnosis of seizures. EEG recording in children is done with partial sleep deprivation and sedative drugs. To compare the effectiveness of melatonin and chloral hydrate on sleep induction and EEG recording in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a parallel blinded randomized clinical trial study, 78 patients (6 months–5 years) were included to record EEG. Patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive melatonin (0.4 mg/kg) or chloral hydrate (0.5 ml/kg). After receiving the sedative drug, the start and duration of sedation, recovery time, side effects, and epileptiform waves in the EEG were recorded. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 16, and the significance level was determined to be less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 78 children, including 34 girls (43.6%) and 44 boys (56.4%) (average age of 27.15±17.15 months), were examined. Success in the induction of sedation was reported by melatonin in 36 patients (92%) and chloral hydrate in 37 patients (95%), which was similar between the two drugs (P=0.5). The start time (P=0.134) and the duration of sedation (P=0.408) were alike between the two drugs. However, compared to the chloral hydrate, the recovery time in the melatonin group was significantly shorter (P<0.001). Side effects were not seen in melatonin, while six children (15%) using chloral hydrate had mild side effects (P=0.013). Epileptiform waves in EEGs were reported to be similar and positive for melatonin in 18 children (50%) and chloral hydrate in 16 children (43%) (P=0.410). CONCLUSION: The findings show that using melatonin in the dose prescribed in this study had similar effects to success in inducing sedation with the minimum quantity of chloral hydrate. Regardless of the start time and duration of sedation, the shorter recovery time and the absence of side effects are the advantages of using melatonin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10617919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106179192023-11-01 Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial Fazli, Bahareh Hosseini, Seyed-Ahmad Behnampour, Nasser Langari, Alale Habibi-koolaee, Mahdi Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) plays an essential role in the diagnosis of seizures. EEG recording in children is done with partial sleep deprivation and sedative drugs. To compare the effectiveness of melatonin and chloral hydrate on sleep induction and EEG recording in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a parallel blinded randomized clinical trial study, 78 patients (6 months–5 years) were included to record EEG. Patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive melatonin (0.4 mg/kg) or chloral hydrate (0.5 ml/kg). After receiving the sedative drug, the start and duration of sedation, recovery time, side effects, and epileptiform waves in the EEG were recorded. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 16, and the significance level was determined to be less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 78 children, including 34 girls (43.6%) and 44 boys (56.4%) (average age of 27.15±17.15 months), were examined. Success in the induction of sedation was reported by melatonin in 36 patients (92%) and chloral hydrate in 37 patients (95%), which was similar between the two drugs (P=0.5). The start time (P=0.134) and the duration of sedation (P=0.408) were alike between the two drugs. However, compared to the chloral hydrate, the recovery time in the melatonin group was significantly shorter (P<0.001). Side effects were not seen in melatonin, while six children (15%) using chloral hydrate had mild side effects (P=0.013). Epileptiform waves in EEGs were reported to be similar and positive for melatonin in 18 children (50%) and chloral hydrate in 16 children (43%) (P=0.410). CONCLUSION: The findings show that using melatonin in the dose prescribed in this study had similar effects to success in inducing sedation with the minimum quantity of chloral hydrate. Regardless of the start time and duration of sedation, the shorter recovery time and the absence of side effects are the advantages of using melatonin. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10617919/ /pubmed/37915677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001140 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Fazli, Bahareh
Hosseini, Seyed-Ahmad
Behnampour, Nasser
Langari, Alale
Habibi-koolaee, Mahdi
Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort melatonin versus chloral hydrate on sleep induction for recording electroencephalography in children: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001140
work_keys_str_mv AT fazlibahareh melatoninversuschloralhydrateonsleepinductionforrecordingelectroencephalographyinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hosseiniseyedahmad melatoninversuschloralhydrateonsleepinductionforrecordingelectroencephalographyinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT behnampournasser melatoninversuschloralhydrateonsleepinductionforrecordingelectroencephalographyinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT langarialale melatoninversuschloralhydrateonsleepinductionforrecordingelectroencephalographyinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT habibikoolaeemahdi melatoninversuschloralhydrateonsleepinductionforrecordingelectroencephalographyinchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial