Cargando…
Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x |
_version_ | 1785129739172708352 |
---|---|
author | Heine, John Fowler, Erin E. E. Weinfurtner, R. Jared Hume, Emma Tworoger, Shelley S. |
author_facet | Heine, John Fowler, Erin E. E. Weinfurtner, R. Jared Hume, Emma Tworoger, Shelley S. |
author_sort | Heine, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case–control (CC) study (n = 426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR = 1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR = 1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41 × CBT, and PD was significant [OR = 1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs ~ 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10618274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106182742023-11-02 Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis Heine, John Fowler, Erin E. E. Weinfurtner, R. Jared Hume, Emma Tworoger, Shelley S. Sci Rep Article Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case–control (CC) study (n = 426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR = 1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR = 1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41 × CBT, and PD was significant [OR = 1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs ~ 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10618274/ /pubmed/37907569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Heine, John Fowler, Erin E. E. Weinfurtner, R. Jared Hume, Emma Tworoger, Shelley S. Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title | Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title_full | Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title_fullStr | Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title_short | Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
title_sort | breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinejohn breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis AT fowlererinee breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis AT weinfurtnerrjared breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis AT humeemma breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis AT tworogershelleys breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis |