Cargando…

Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis

Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heine, John, Fowler, Erin E. E., Weinfurtner, R. Jared, Hume, Emma, Tworoger, Shelley S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
_version_ 1785129739172708352
author Heine, John
Fowler, Erin E. E.
Weinfurtner, R. Jared
Hume, Emma
Tworoger, Shelley S.
author_facet Heine, John
Fowler, Erin E. E.
Weinfurtner, R. Jared
Hume, Emma
Tworoger, Shelley S.
author_sort Heine, John
collection PubMed
description Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case–control (CC) study (n = 426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR = 1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR = 1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41 × CBT, and PD was significant [OR = 1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs ~ 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106182742023-11-02 Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis Heine, John Fowler, Erin E. E. Weinfurtner, R. Jared Hume, Emma Tworoger, Shelley S. Sci Rep Article Mammography shifted to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the US. An automated percentage of breast density (PD) technique designed for two-dimensional (2D) applications was evaluated with DBT using several breast cancer risk prediction measures: normalized-volumetric; dense volume; applied to the volume slices and averaged (slice-mean); and applied to synthetic 2D images. Volumetric measures were derived theoretically. PD was modeled as a function of compressed breast thickness (CBT). The mean and standard deviation of the pixel values were investigated. A matched case–control (CC) study (n = 426 pairs) was evaluated. Odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. ORs were significant for PD: identical for volumetric and slice-mean measures [OR = 1.43 (1.18, 1.72)] and [OR = 1.44 (1.18, 1.75)] for synthetic images. A 2nd degree polynomial (concave-down) was used to model PD as a function of CBT: location of the maximum PD value was similar across CCs, occurring at 0.41 × CBT, and PD was significant [OR = 1.47 (1.21, 1.78)]. The means from the volume and synthetic images were also significant [ORs ~ 1.31 (1.09, 1.57)]. An alternative standardized 2D synthetic image was constructed, where each pixel value represents the percentage of breast density above its location. Several measures were significant and an alternative method for constructing a standardized 2D synthetic image was produced. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10618274/ /pubmed/37907569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Heine, John
Fowler, Erin E. E.
Weinfurtner, R. Jared
Hume, Emma
Tworoger, Shelley S.
Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title_full Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title_fullStr Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title_full_unstemmed Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title_short Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
title_sort breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45402-x
work_keys_str_mv AT heinejohn breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis
AT fowlererinee breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis
AT weinfurtnerrjared breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis
AT humeemma breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis
AT tworogershelleys breastdensityanalysisofdigitalbreasttomosynthesis