Cargando…

Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location

Bone material strength index (BMSi) values are obtained using impact microindentation, which assesses the ability of bone to resist indentation. Differences in BMSi between men and women are unclear, and to date, BMSi sex differences have not been compared for individuals from the same population. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holloway-Kew, Kara L., Rufus-Membere, Pamela G., Anderson, Kara B., Harland, Jacob W., Diez-Perez, Adolfo, Kotowicz, Mark A., Pasco, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9
_version_ 1785129750882156544
author Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Rufus-Membere, Pamela G.
Anderson, Kara B.
Harland, Jacob W.
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
author_facet Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Rufus-Membere, Pamela G.
Anderson, Kara B.
Harland, Jacob W.
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
author_sort Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
collection PubMed
description Bone material strength index (BMSi) values are obtained using impact microindentation, which assesses the ability of bone to resist indentation. Differences in BMSi between men and women are unclear, and to date, BMSi sex differences have not been compared for individuals from the same population. Therefore, we compared BMSi values for men and women drawn from the same geographical location in Australia. Participants (n = 220) were from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured, following international published guidelines, using an OsteoProbe for participants at recent follow-up phases (women 2022–2023 and men 2016–2022). Women (n = 55) were age matched to men (n = 165) in a 1:3 ratio. A two-sample t test was used to determine the intergroup difference in mean BMSi. Linear regression was also performed, adjusting for weight and height. Median (IQR) ages for men and women were 67.0 (61.7–71.5) and 67.4 (62.0–71.2) years (p = 0.998). Men were heavier (81.0 ± 10.9 vs 71.0 ± 13.9 kg, p < 0.001) and taller (173.9 ± 6.4 vs 161.5 ± 7.5 cm, p < 0.001) than women. Mean (± SD) BMSi for women (75.7 ± 7.4) was lower than for men (82.8 ± 6.8) (p < 0.001). The difference persisted after adjustment for weight and height (mean ± SE: 76.5 ± 1.1 vs 82.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Given the higher fracture risk observed for women, the higher mean BMSi values in men are consistent with cross sectional data suggesting this measure may be useful in fracture prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106183262023-11-02 Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location Holloway-Kew, Kara L. Rufus-Membere, Pamela G. Anderson, Kara B. Harland, Jacob W. Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A. Pasco, Julie A. Calcif Tissue Int Original Research Bone material strength index (BMSi) values are obtained using impact microindentation, which assesses the ability of bone to resist indentation. Differences in BMSi between men and women are unclear, and to date, BMSi sex differences have not been compared for individuals from the same population. Therefore, we compared BMSi values for men and women drawn from the same geographical location in Australia. Participants (n = 220) were from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured, following international published guidelines, using an OsteoProbe for participants at recent follow-up phases (women 2022–2023 and men 2016–2022). Women (n = 55) were age matched to men (n = 165) in a 1:3 ratio. A two-sample t test was used to determine the intergroup difference in mean BMSi. Linear regression was also performed, adjusting for weight and height. Median (IQR) ages for men and women were 67.0 (61.7–71.5) and 67.4 (62.0–71.2) years (p = 0.998). Men were heavier (81.0 ± 10.9 vs 71.0 ± 13.9 kg, p < 0.001) and taller (173.9 ± 6.4 vs 161.5 ± 7.5 cm, p < 0.001) than women. Mean (± SD) BMSi for women (75.7 ± 7.4) was lower than for men (82.8 ± 6.8) (p < 0.001). The difference persisted after adjustment for weight and height (mean ± SE: 76.5 ± 1.1 vs 82.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Given the higher fracture risk observed for women, the higher mean BMSi values in men are consistent with cross sectional data suggesting this measure may be useful in fracture prediction. Springer US 2023-09-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10618326/ /pubmed/37666992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Rufus-Membere, Pamela G.
Anderson, Kara B.
Harland, Jacob W.
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title_full Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title_fullStr Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title_full_unstemmed Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title_short Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location
title_sort mean bone material strength index values for women are lower than those for men: data from a single geographical location
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hollowaykewkaral meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT rufusmemberepamelag meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT andersonkarab meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT harlandjacobw meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT diezperezadolfo meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT kotowiczmarka meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation
AT pascojuliea meanbonematerialstrengthindexvaluesforwomenarelowerthanthoseformendatafromasinglegeographicallocation