Cargando…

Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions

Currently, there is a lack of research directly comparing the precision of automatic weighing systems and manual weighing in the context of particulate matter (PM) filter equilibration and measurements under different humidity conditions. During experimental measurements, three different types of PM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chyzhykov, Dmytro, Widziewicz-Rzońca, Kamila, Błaszczak, Monika, Rogula-Kopiec, Patrycja, Słaby, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11939-7
_version_ 1785129762090385408
author Chyzhykov, Dmytro
Widziewicz-Rzońca, Kamila
Błaszczak, Monika
Rogula-Kopiec, Patrycja
Słaby, Krzysztof
author_facet Chyzhykov, Dmytro
Widziewicz-Rzońca, Kamila
Błaszczak, Monika
Rogula-Kopiec, Patrycja
Słaby, Krzysztof
author_sort Chyzhykov, Dmytro
collection PubMed
description Currently, there is a lack of research directly comparing the precision of automatic weighing systems and manual weighing in the context of particulate matter (PM) filter equilibration and measurements under different humidity conditions. During experimental measurements, three different types of PM-loaded filters were weighed using manual and automatic balances. During manual weighing, every filter was weighed twice in three different relative humidity conditions. The same procedure was done using an automated weighing system. In most cases, it was found that under relative humidities in the range of 30–55% RH, the manual and automated methods can be treated as referential. Regarding device stability, very slight but overall better precision was found for 30% RH, suggesting that 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix L requirements regarding conditioning humidity (30–40% RH) seem more suitable than those presented in the PN-EN 12341:2014 standard (45–50% RH). Understanding the effects of the influence of the RH% on PM mass measurements is a matter of great importance, because water vapor condensed on a filter can affect the particulate matter concentrations. This is especially important in areas where regulatory limits are exceeded. Calculation of uncertainty in the PM mass measurements is therefore crucial for determining the actual sample mass and improving air monitoring practices. In a nutshell, the experimental results obtained clearly describe how changing RH% conditions affect the PM weighing precision during manual and automated measurements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-023-11939-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106183742023-11-02 Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions Chyzhykov, Dmytro Widziewicz-Rzońca, Kamila Błaszczak, Monika Rogula-Kopiec, Patrycja Słaby, Krzysztof Environ Monit Assess Research Currently, there is a lack of research directly comparing the precision of automatic weighing systems and manual weighing in the context of particulate matter (PM) filter equilibration and measurements under different humidity conditions. During experimental measurements, three different types of PM-loaded filters were weighed using manual and automatic balances. During manual weighing, every filter was weighed twice in three different relative humidity conditions. The same procedure was done using an automated weighing system. In most cases, it was found that under relative humidities in the range of 30–55% RH, the manual and automated methods can be treated as referential. Regarding device stability, very slight but overall better precision was found for 30% RH, suggesting that 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix L requirements regarding conditioning humidity (30–40% RH) seem more suitable than those presented in the PN-EN 12341:2014 standard (45–50% RH). Understanding the effects of the influence of the RH% on PM mass measurements is a matter of great importance, because water vapor condensed on a filter can affect the particulate matter concentrations. This is especially important in areas where regulatory limits are exceeded. Calculation of uncertainty in the PM mass measurements is therefore crucial for determining the actual sample mass and improving air monitoring practices. In a nutshell, the experimental results obtained clearly describe how changing RH% conditions affect the PM weighing precision during manual and automated measurements. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-023-11939-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10618374/ /pubmed/37906283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11939-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Chyzhykov, Dmytro
Widziewicz-Rzońca, Kamila
Błaszczak, Monika
Rogula-Kopiec, Patrycja
Słaby, Krzysztof
Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title_full Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title_fullStr Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title_full_unstemmed Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title_short Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
title_sort automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in pm-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11939-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chyzhykovdmytro automaticweighingsystemvsmanualweighingprecisioncomparisoninpmloadedfiltermeasurementsunderdifferenthumidityconditions
AT widziewiczrzoncakamila automaticweighingsystemvsmanualweighingprecisioncomparisoninpmloadedfiltermeasurementsunderdifferenthumidityconditions
AT błaszczakmonika automaticweighingsystemvsmanualweighingprecisioncomparisoninpmloadedfiltermeasurementsunderdifferenthumidityconditions
AT rogulakopiecpatrycja automaticweighingsystemvsmanualweighingprecisioncomparisoninpmloadedfiltermeasurementsunderdifferenthumidityconditions
AT słabykrzysztof automaticweighingsystemvsmanualweighingprecisioncomparisoninpmloadedfiltermeasurementsunderdifferenthumidityconditions