Cargando…

The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches

Volcanic eruptions are driven by magma rising through Earth’s crust. The style of an eruption depends on intrinsic and extrinsic parameters and is commonly a dynamic process. Thorough and holistic investigation of the related products is key to understanding eruptive phenomena and assessment of volc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pisello, Alessandro, Kueppers, Ulrich, Düffels, Kai, Nomikou, Paraskevi, Dingwell, Donald B., Perugini, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-023-01679-4
_version_ 1785129767335362560
author Pisello, Alessandro
Kueppers, Ulrich
Düffels, Kai
Nomikou, Paraskevi
Dingwell, Donald B.
Perugini, Diego
author_facet Pisello, Alessandro
Kueppers, Ulrich
Düffels, Kai
Nomikou, Paraskevi
Dingwell, Donald B.
Perugini, Diego
author_sort Pisello, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Volcanic eruptions are driven by magma rising through Earth’s crust. The style of an eruption depends on intrinsic and extrinsic parameters and is commonly a dynamic process. Thorough and holistic investigation of the related products is key to understanding eruptive phenomena and assessment of volcano-specific hazards. Models of such phenomena are constrained by quantification of the dispersal, the grain size distribution, and pyroclast textures. Pyroclast texture may be described in part by measurements of density and porosity, which depend on pyroclast volume determination. Yet volume determination of irregularly shaped pyroclasts cannot be achieved with geometrical laws, instead necessitating the use of alternative methodologies. Here, we test three methodologies to quantify pyroclast volume on a set of clasts collected from the Minoan eruption deposits from Santorini, Greece. We compare (1) a manual method for obtaining the lengths of three orthogonal axes of the pyroclast with a caliper, (2) an optical method to measure the longest and shortest axes of the pyroclast via multiple photographs, and (3) an Archimedean buoyancy-based method. While the optical and manual methods provide almost identical values of pyroclast volume when tested under laboratory conditions, there is a discrepancy between these two methods and the Archimedean method, which produces an overestimation of ca. 13% in volume. This discrepancy has little impact on the subsequent assessment of porosity and density for which the natural variability of values is observed to be broader. We therefore propose using the manual approach in the field as a simple and fast, yet reliable, method to obtain large volumes of quantitative data on the texture of erupted products, and we also provide a correction factor for in-field volume assessment of rhyodacitic pumices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-023-01679-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106183982023-11-02 The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches Pisello, Alessandro Kueppers, Ulrich Düffels, Kai Nomikou, Paraskevi Dingwell, Donald B. Perugini, Diego Bull Volcanol Research Article Volcanic eruptions are driven by magma rising through Earth’s crust. The style of an eruption depends on intrinsic and extrinsic parameters and is commonly a dynamic process. Thorough and holistic investigation of the related products is key to understanding eruptive phenomena and assessment of volcano-specific hazards. Models of such phenomena are constrained by quantification of the dispersal, the grain size distribution, and pyroclast textures. Pyroclast texture may be described in part by measurements of density and porosity, which depend on pyroclast volume determination. Yet volume determination of irregularly shaped pyroclasts cannot be achieved with geometrical laws, instead necessitating the use of alternative methodologies. Here, we test three methodologies to quantify pyroclast volume on a set of clasts collected from the Minoan eruption deposits from Santorini, Greece. We compare (1) a manual method for obtaining the lengths of three orthogonal axes of the pyroclast with a caliper, (2) an optical method to measure the longest and shortest axes of the pyroclast via multiple photographs, and (3) an Archimedean buoyancy-based method. While the optical and manual methods provide almost identical values of pyroclast volume when tested under laboratory conditions, there is a discrepancy between these two methods and the Archimedean method, which produces an overestimation of ca. 13% in volume. This discrepancy has little impact on the subsequent assessment of porosity and density for which the natural variability of values is observed to be broader. We therefore propose using the manual approach in the field as a simple and fast, yet reliable, method to obtain large volumes of quantitative data on the texture of erupted products, and we also provide a correction factor for in-field volume assessment of rhyodacitic pumices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-023-01679-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10618398/ /pubmed/37920291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-023-01679-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Pisello, Alessandro
Kueppers, Ulrich
Düffels, Kai
Nomikou, Paraskevi
Dingwell, Donald B.
Perugini, Diego
The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title_full The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title_fullStr The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title_full_unstemmed The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title_short The porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
title_sort porosity of felsic pyroclasts: laboratory validation of field-based approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-023-01679-4
work_keys_str_mv AT piselloalessandro theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT kueppersulrich theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT duffelskai theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT nomikouparaskevi theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT dingwelldonaldb theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT peruginidiego theporosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT piselloalessandro porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT kueppersulrich porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT duffelskai porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT nomikouparaskevi porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT dingwelldonaldb porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches
AT peruginidiego porosityoffelsicpyroclastslaboratoryvalidationoffieldbasedapproaches