Cargando…
Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients
This study intends to predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality, as well as 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission, using Machine Learning (ML) approach via conventional features. A total of 737 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria to 1101 heart failure patients. Thirty-four conve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45925-3 |
_version_ | 1785129781951463424 |
---|---|
author | Sabouri, Maziar Rajabi, Ahmad Bitarafan Hajianfar, Ghasem Gharibi, Omid Mohebi, Mobin Avval, Atlas Haddadi Naderi, Nasim Shiri, Isaac |
author_facet | Sabouri, Maziar Rajabi, Ahmad Bitarafan Hajianfar, Ghasem Gharibi, Omid Mohebi, Mobin Avval, Atlas Haddadi Naderi, Nasim Shiri, Isaac |
author_sort | Sabouri, Maziar |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study intends to predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality, as well as 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission, using Machine Learning (ML) approach via conventional features. A total of 737 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria to 1101 heart failure patients. Thirty-four conventional features were collected for each patient. First, the data were divided into train and test cohorts with a 70–30% ratio. Then train data were normalized using the Z-score method, and its mean and standard deviation were applied to the test data. Subsequently, Boruta, RFE, and MRMR feature selection methods were utilized to select more important features in the training set. In the next step, eight ML approaches were used for modeling. Next, hyperparameters were optimized using tenfold cross-validation and grid search in the train dataset. All model development steps (normalization, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization) were performed on a train set without touching the hold-out test set. Then, bootstrapping was done 1000 times on the hold-out test data. Finally, the obtained results were evaluated using four metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPE), and sensitivity (SEN). The RFE-LR (AUC: 0.91, ACC: 0.84, SPE: 0.84, SEN: 0.83) and Boruta-LR (AUC: 0.90, ACC: 0.85, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.83) models generated the best results in terms of in-hospital mortality. In terms of 30-day rehospitalization, Boruta-SVM (AUC: 0.73, ACC: 0.81, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.50) and MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.71, ACC: 0.68, SPE: 0.69, SEN: 0.63) models performed the best. The best model for 3-month rehospitalization was MRMR-KNN (AUC: 0.60, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.66, SEN: 0.53) and regarding 6-month mortality, the MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.61, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.44, SEN: 0.66) and MRMR-NB (AUC: 0.59, ACC: 0.61, SPE: 0.48, SEN: 0.63) models outperformed the others. Reliable models were developed in 30-day rehospitalization and in-hospital mortality using conventional features and ML techniques. Such models can effectively personalize treatment, decision-making, and wiser budget allocation. Obtained results in 3-month rehospitalization and 6-month mortality endpoints were not astonishing and further experiments with additional information are needed to fetch promising results in these endpoints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10618467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106184672023-11-02 Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients Sabouri, Maziar Rajabi, Ahmad Bitarafan Hajianfar, Ghasem Gharibi, Omid Mohebi, Mobin Avval, Atlas Haddadi Naderi, Nasim Shiri, Isaac Sci Rep Article This study intends to predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality, as well as 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission, using Machine Learning (ML) approach via conventional features. A total of 737 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria to 1101 heart failure patients. Thirty-four conventional features were collected for each patient. First, the data were divided into train and test cohorts with a 70–30% ratio. Then train data were normalized using the Z-score method, and its mean and standard deviation were applied to the test data. Subsequently, Boruta, RFE, and MRMR feature selection methods were utilized to select more important features in the training set. In the next step, eight ML approaches were used for modeling. Next, hyperparameters were optimized using tenfold cross-validation and grid search in the train dataset. All model development steps (normalization, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization) were performed on a train set without touching the hold-out test set. Then, bootstrapping was done 1000 times on the hold-out test data. Finally, the obtained results were evaluated using four metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPE), and sensitivity (SEN). The RFE-LR (AUC: 0.91, ACC: 0.84, SPE: 0.84, SEN: 0.83) and Boruta-LR (AUC: 0.90, ACC: 0.85, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.83) models generated the best results in terms of in-hospital mortality. In terms of 30-day rehospitalization, Boruta-SVM (AUC: 0.73, ACC: 0.81, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.50) and MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.71, ACC: 0.68, SPE: 0.69, SEN: 0.63) models performed the best. The best model for 3-month rehospitalization was MRMR-KNN (AUC: 0.60, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.66, SEN: 0.53) and regarding 6-month mortality, the MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.61, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.44, SEN: 0.66) and MRMR-NB (AUC: 0.59, ACC: 0.61, SPE: 0.48, SEN: 0.63) models outperformed the others. Reliable models were developed in 30-day rehospitalization and in-hospital mortality using conventional features and ML techniques. Such models can effectively personalize treatment, decision-making, and wiser budget allocation. Obtained results in 3-month rehospitalization and 6-month mortality endpoints were not astonishing and further experiments with additional information are needed to fetch promising results in these endpoints. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10618467/ /pubmed/37907666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45925-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sabouri, Maziar Rajabi, Ahmad Bitarafan Hajianfar, Ghasem Gharibi, Omid Mohebi, Mobin Avval, Atlas Haddadi Naderi, Nasim Shiri, Isaac Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title | Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title_full | Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title_fullStr | Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title_short | Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
title_sort | machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45925-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabourimaziar machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT rajabiahmadbitarafan machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT hajianfarghasem machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT gharibiomid machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT mohebimobin machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT avvalatlashaddadi machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT naderinasim machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients AT shiriisaac machinelearningbasedreadmissionandmortalitypredictioninheartfailurepatients |