Cargando…

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement

BACKGROUND: Outcomes-based agreements (OBA) are performance-based risk-sharing agreements between manufacturers and payers which provide the opportunity for collection and evaluation of real-world outcomes to supplement clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To describe an OBA comparing ticagrelor to clopidog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peasah, Samuel K., Huang, Yan, Venditto, John, Brekosky, Robert, Belletti, Daniel, Campbell, Vanessa, Manolis, Chronis, Good, Chester B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100347
_version_ 1785129785706414080
author Peasah, Samuel K.
Huang, Yan
Venditto, John
Brekosky, Robert
Belletti, Daniel
Campbell, Vanessa
Manolis, Chronis
Good, Chester B.
author_facet Peasah, Samuel K.
Huang, Yan
Venditto, John
Brekosky, Robert
Belletti, Daniel
Campbell, Vanessa
Manolis, Chronis
Good, Chester B.
author_sort Peasah, Samuel K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outcomes-based agreements (OBA) are performance-based risk-sharing agreements between manufacturers and payers which provide the opportunity for collection and evaluation of real-world outcomes to supplement clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To describe an OBA comparing ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and proportion of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Commercial (CM) and Medicare (MC) insurance patients of a large regional health plan, who presented with ACS and were prescribed either ticagrelor or clopidogrel were prospectively analyzed. The cohort consisted of adults (18–85 years) discharged between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, who were adherent to the study medications, within the confines of the OBA. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of recurrent MI hospitalizations within one year of discharge. RESULTS: There were 500 patients who met inclusion criteria in the ticagrelor cohort and 648 in the clopidogrel cohort. The mean age of patients in the ticagrelor cohort was 61.5 ± 10.5 years old and 66.5 ± 10.2 years in the clopidogrel cohort. The proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or a history of congestive heart failure at baseline in the ticagrelor cohort was 31%, 85%, 14% respectively, and 43%, 90%, and 32% respectively in the clopidogrel cohort. The overall proportion of hospitalization for recurrent MI was 1.00% in the ticagrelor and 3.13% in the clopidogrel cohorts. In the follow-up propensity-matched analysis, although recurrent MI hospitalization was higher in the clopidogrel cohort (1.69% vs 1.21%) it was not statistically significant (p-value 0.5242). CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with ACS and treated with ticagrelor had a lower rate of hospitalization for recurrent MI compared to patients treated with clopidogrel cohort within the confines of an OBA in a real-world setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106184842023-11-02 Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement Peasah, Samuel K. Huang, Yan Venditto, John Brekosky, Robert Belletti, Daniel Campbell, Vanessa Manolis, Chronis Good, Chester B. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: Outcomes-based agreements (OBA) are performance-based risk-sharing agreements between manufacturers and payers which provide the opportunity for collection and evaluation of real-world outcomes to supplement clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To describe an OBA comparing ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and proportion of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Commercial (CM) and Medicare (MC) insurance patients of a large regional health plan, who presented with ACS and were prescribed either ticagrelor or clopidogrel were prospectively analyzed. The cohort consisted of adults (18–85 years) discharged between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, who were adherent to the study medications, within the confines of the OBA. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of recurrent MI hospitalizations within one year of discharge. RESULTS: There were 500 patients who met inclusion criteria in the ticagrelor cohort and 648 in the clopidogrel cohort. The mean age of patients in the ticagrelor cohort was 61.5 ± 10.5 years old and 66.5 ± 10.2 years in the clopidogrel cohort. The proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or a history of congestive heart failure at baseline in the ticagrelor cohort was 31%, 85%, 14% respectively, and 43%, 90%, and 32% respectively in the clopidogrel cohort. The overall proportion of hospitalization for recurrent MI was 1.00% in the ticagrelor and 3.13% in the clopidogrel cohorts. In the follow-up propensity-matched analysis, although recurrent MI hospitalization was higher in the clopidogrel cohort (1.69% vs 1.21%) it was not statistically significant (p-value 0.5242). CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with ACS and treated with ticagrelor had a lower rate of hospitalization for recurrent MI compared to patients treated with clopidogrel cohort within the confines of an OBA in a real-world setting. Elsevier 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10618484/ /pubmed/37920750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100347 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peasah, Samuel K.
Huang, Yan
Venditto, John
Brekosky, Robert
Belletti, Daniel
Campbell, Vanessa
Manolis, Chronis
Good, Chester B.
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title_full Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title_fullStr Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title_full_unstemmed Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title_short Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: An outcomes-based agreement
title_sort ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recurrent myocardial infarction: an outcomes-based agreement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100347
work_keys_str_mv AT peasahsamuelk ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT huangyan ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT vendittojohn ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT brekoskyrobert ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT bellettidaniel ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT campbellvanessa ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT manolischronis ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement
AT goodchesterb ticagrelorversusclopidogrelforrecurrentmyocardialinfarctionanoutcomesbasedagreement