Cargando…

Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database

Background In the United States, intellectual disabilities are related to higher death rates. Given the relationship between intellectual disabilities and places of death, it is important to evaluate trends and disparities in places of death to direct physician and patient education and improve the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suresh, Raizel Michelina, Afzal, Fatima, Abdel-Aal, Aiah Mounir, Singla, Siddharth, Dixit, Aryaa, Charanrak, Riley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920627
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46347
_version_ 1785129836875874304
author Suresh, Raizel Michelina
Afzal, Fatima
Abdel-Aal, Aiah Mounir
Singla, Siddharth
Dixit, Aryaa
Charanrak, Riley
author_facet Suresh, Raizel Michelina
Afzal, Fatima
Abdel-Aal, Aiah Mounir
Singla, Siddharth
Dixit, Aryaa
Charanrak, Riley
author_sort Suresh, Raizel Michelina
collection PubMed
description Background In the United States, intellectual disabilities are related to higher death rates. Given the relationship between intellectual disabilities and places of death, it is important to evaluate trends and disparities in places of death to direct physician and patient education and improve the chances of patients who will receive end-of-life care to be suitable with their preferences and values. In this study, the data from the CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database was used to examine mortality trends in places of death of patients with intellectual disabilities in the United States between 1999 and 2020. Methodology The data were collected with the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes F70-F79 (intellectual disability) from the CDC WONDER website on July 20, 2023, to evaluate disparities in places of death. R programming software was used to conduct statistical analysis for predicting death trends in hospice or home care for age groups, genders, census regions, and races. Results In total, 9,432 patients with intellectual disabilities died between 1999 and 2020. The highest number of deaths was in the age group of 55-64 years (2,281) and the lowest was in the age group of 1-4 years (55). The data showed that mortality rates among various demographic groups varied significantly. The age group of 25-34 years was more likely to die in a home/hospice setting (odds ratio (OR) = 2.137, confidence interval (CI) = 1.452, 3.145, p < 0.001), considering 85+ years as the reference age. The age group of 1-4 years had the lowest risk of death at home or hospice (OR = 0.147, CI = 0.108, 0.2, p = 0.001). Conclusions The deaths from intellectual disabilities from 1999 to 2020 were higher in medical facilities than those in home or hospice care. The mortality was higher for older adults, whites, and males in the Midwest and the South regions, as well as in medical faculties compared to other categories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106187102023-11-02 Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database Suresh, Raizel Michelina Afzal, Fatima Abdel-Aal, Aiah Mounir Singla, Siddharth Dixit, Aryaa Charanrak, Riley Cureus Psychiatry Background In the United States, intellectual disabilities are related to higher death rates. Given the relationship between intellectual disabilities and places of death, it is important to evaluate trends and disparities in places of death to direct physician and patient education and improve the chances of patients who will receive end-of-life care to be suitable with their preferences and values. In this study, the data from the CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database was used to examine mortality trends in places of death of patients with intellectual disabilities in the United States between 1999 and 2020. Methodology The data were collected with the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes F70-F79 (intellectual disability) from the CDC WONDER website on July 20, 2023, to evaluate disparities in places of death. R programming software was used to conduct statistical analysis for predicting death trends in hospice or home care for age groups, genders, census regions, and races. Results In total, 9,432 patients with intellectual disabilities died between 1999 and 2020. The highest number of deaths was in the age group of 55-64 years (2,281) and the lowest was in the age group of 1-4 years (55). The data showed that mortality rates among various demographic groups varied significantly. The age group of 25-34 years was more likely to die in a home/hospice setting (odds ratio (OR) = 2.137, confidence interval (CI) = 1.452, 3.145, p < 0.001), considering 85+ years as the reference age. The age group of 1-4 years had the lowest risk of death at home or hospice (OR = 0.147, CI = 0.108, 0.2, p = 0.001). Conclusions The deaths from intellectual disabilities from 1999 to 2020 were higher in medical facilities than those in home or hospice care. The mortality was higher for older adults, whites, and males in the Midwest and the South regions, as well as in medical faculties compared to other categories. Cureus 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10618710/ /pubmed/37920627 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46347 Text en Copyright © 2023, Suresh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Suresh, Raizel Michelina
Afzal, Fatima
Abdel-Aal, Aiah Mounir
Singla, Siddharth
Dixit, Aryaa
Charanrak, Riley
Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title_full Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title_fullStr Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title_short Evaluating Disparities in Places of Death in the United States Among Patients With Intellectual Disabilities: A 22-Year Analysis Using the CDC-WONDER Database
title_sort evaluating disparities in places of death in the united states among patients with intellectual disabilities: a 22-year analysis using the cdc-wonder database
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920627
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46347
work_keys_str_mv AT sureshraizelmichelina evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase
AT afzalfatima evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase
AT abdelaalaiahmounir evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase
AT singlasiddharth evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase
AT dixitaryaa evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase
AT charanrakriley evaluatingdisparitiesinplacesofdeathintheunitedstatesamongpatientswithintellectualdisabilitiesa22yearanalysisusingthecdcwonderdatabase