Cargando…

Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palazzo, Gabriele, Mangili, Paola, Deantoni, Chiara, Fodor, Andrei, Broggi, Sara, Castriconi, Roberta, Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia, del Vecchio, Antonella, Di Muzio, Nadia G., Fiorino, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501
_version_ 1785129846327738368
author Palazzo, Gabriele
Mangili, Paola
Deantoni, Chiara
Fodor, Andrei
Broggi, Sara
Castriconi, Roberta
Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia
del Vecchio, Antonella
Di Muzio, Nadia G.
Fiorino, Claudio
author_facet Palazzo, Gabriele
Mangili, Paola
Deantoni, Chiara
Fodor, Andrei
Broggi, Sara
Castriconi, Roberta
Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia
del Vecchio, Antonella
Di Muzio, Nadia G.
Fiorino, Claudio
author_sort Palazzo, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared. RESULTS: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76–0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3–7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106187612023-11-02 Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning Palazzo, Gabriele Mangili, Paola Deantoni, Chiara Fodor, Andrei Broggi, Sara Castriconi, Roberta Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia del Vecchio, Antonella Di Muzio, Nadia G. Fiorino, Claudio Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared. RESULTS: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76–0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3–7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators. Elsevier 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10618761/ /pubmed/37920450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Palazzo, Gabriele
Mangili, Paola
Deantoni, Chiara
Fodor, Andrei
Broggi, Sara
Castriconi, Roberta
Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia
del Vecchio, Antonella
Di Muzio, Nadia G.
Fiorino, Claudio
Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title_full Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title_short Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
title_sort real-world validation of artificial intelligence-based computed tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501
work_keys_str_mv AT palazzogabriele realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT mangilipaola realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT deantonichiara realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT fodorandrei realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT broggisara realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT castriconiroberta realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT ubeiragabellinimariagiulia realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT delvecchioantonella realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT dimuzionadiag realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning
AT fiorinoclaudio realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning