Cargando…
Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501 |
_version_ | 1785129846327738368 |
---|---|
author | Palazzo, Gabriele Mangili, Paola Deantoni, Chiara Fodor, Andrei Broggi, Sara Castriconi, Roberta Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia del Vecchio, Antonella Di Muzio, Nadia G. Fiorino, Claudio |
author_facet | Palazzo, Gabriele Mangili, Paola Deantoni, Chiara Fodor, Andrei Broggi, Sara Castriconi, Roberta Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia del Vecchio, Antonella Di Muzio, Nadia G. Fiorino, Claudio |
author_sort | Palazzo, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared. RESULTS: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76–0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3–7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10618761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106187612023-11-02 Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning Palazzo, Gabriele Mangili, Paola Deantoni, Chiara Fodor, Andrei Broggi, Sara Castriconi, Roberta Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia del Vecchio, Antonella Di Muzio, Nadia G. Fiorino, Claudio Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared. RESULTS: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76–0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3–7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators. Elsevier 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10618761/ /pubmed/37920450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Palazzo, Gabriele Mangili, Paola Deantoni, Chiara Fodor, Andrei Broggi, Sara Castriconi, Roberta Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia del Vecchio, Antonella Di Muzio, Nadia G. Fiorino, Claudio Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title | Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title_full | Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title_fullStr | Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title_short | Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
title_sort | real-world validation of artificial intelligence-based computed tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palazzogabriele realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT mangilipaola realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT deantonichiara realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT fodorandrei realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT broggisara realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT castriconiroberta realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT ubeiragabellinimariagiulia realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT delvecchioantonella realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT dimuzionadiag realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning AT fiorinoclaudio realworldvalidationofartificialintelligencebasedcomputedtomographyautocontouringforprostatecancerradiotherapyplanning |