Cargando…

Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer

IMPORTANCE: The optimal interpregnancy interval (IPI) after a clinical pregnancy loss (CPL) remains controversial. Few studies have addressed the role of the IPI after a preceding CPL during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between different IPI lengths...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ze, Meng, Yueru, Shang, Xue, Suo, Lu, Zhao, Dingying, Han, Xinwei, Yang, Min, Yin, Mengfei, Miao, Haozhe, Wang, Yixuan, Yang, Huiming, Yu, Yunhai, Wei, Daimin, Chen, Zi-Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40709
_version_ 1785129864496414720
author Wang, Ze
Meng, Yueru
Shang, Xue
Suo, Lu
Zhao, Dingying
Han, Xinwei
Yang, Min
Yin, Mengfei
Miao, Haozhe
Wang, Yixuan
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_facet Wang, Ze
Meng, Yueru
Shang, Xue
Suo, Lu
Zhao, Dingying
Han, Xinwei
Yang, Min
Yin, Mengfei
Miao, Haozhe
Wang, Yixuan
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_sort Wang, Ze
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The optimal interpregnancy interval (IPI) after a clinical pregnancy loss (CPL) remains controversial. Few studies have addressed the role of the IPI after a preceding CPL during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between different IPI lengths after a preceding CPL and pregnancy outcomes of the next frozen embryo transfer (FET). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Shandong University in China. The study included women who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, within 1 year after a preceding CPL during IVF treatment. Follow-up for pregnancy outcomes was completed for all participants on March 31, 2023. Data analysis was performed from April to May 2023. EXPOSURES: Interpregnancy interval length was classified as less than 3 months, 3 to less than 6 months, or 6 to 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes included live birth, conception, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, preterm birth, small or large for gestational age, and low birth weight. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between IPI and pregnancy outcomes by adjusted odds ratios (AORs). RESULTS: This study included 2433 women (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [4.6] years) who received IVF treatment. There were 338 women (13.9%) with an IPI of less than 3 months, 1347 (55.4%) with an IPI of 3 to less than 6 months, and 748 (30.7%) with an IPI of 6 to 12 months. The median (IQR) IPI lengths for the 3 groups were 77 (65-85), 128 (109-152), and 234 (202-288) days, respectively. Compared with an IPI of 6 to 12 months, shorter IPIs (<3 and 3 to <6 months) were associated with decreased odds of clinical pregnancy (AOR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.92] and 0.79 [0.65-0.95]), live birth (AOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.85] and 0.74 [0.61-0.90]), and healthy live birth (AOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46-0.87] and 0.79 [0.64-0.98]). Compared with women with an IPI of 6 to 12 months, women with shorter IPIs (<3 and 3 to <6 months) had a higher risk of total pregnancy loss (AOR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.31-2.67] and 1.29 [1.00-1.66], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that delaying the next FET for at least 6 months after a preceding CPL was associated with beneficial pregnancy outcomes, considering that a decreased likelihood of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth was observed among women with shorter IPIs. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106188452023-11-02 Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer Wang, Ze Meng, Yueru Shang, Xue Suo, Lu Zhao, Dingying Han, Xinwei Yang, Min Yin, Mengfei Miao, Haozhe Wang, Yixuan Yang, Huiming Yu, Yunhai Wei, Daimin Chen, Zi-Jiang JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The optimal interpregnancy interval (IPI) after a clinical pregnancy loss (CPL) remains controversial. Few studies have addressed the role of the IPI after a preceding CPL during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between different IPI lengths after a preceding CPL and pregnancy outcomes of the next frozen embryo transfer (FET). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Shandong University in China. The study included women who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, within 1 year after a preceding CPL during IVF treatment. Follow-up for pregnancy outcomes was completed for all participants on March 31, 2023. Data analysis was performed from April to May 2023. EXPOSURES: Interpregnancy interval length was classified as less than 3 months, 3 to less than 6 months, or 6 to 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes included live birth, conception, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, preterm birth, small or large for gestational age, and low birth weight. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between IPI and pregnancy outcomes by adjusted odds ratios (AORs). RESULTS: This study included 2433 women (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [4.6] years) who received IVF treatment. There were 338 women (13.9%) with an IPI of less than 3 months, 1347 (55.4%) with an IPI of 3 to less than 6 months, and 748 (30.7%) with an IPI of 6 to 12 months. The median (IQR) IPI lengths for the 3 groups were 77 (65-85), 128 (109-152), and 234 (202-288) days, respectively. Compared with an IPI of 6 to 12 months, shorter IPIs (<3 and 3 to <6 months) were associated with decreased odds of clinical pregnancy (AOR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.92] and 0.79 [0.65-0.95]), live birth (AOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.85] and 0.74 [0.61-0.90]), and healthy live birth (AOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46-0.87] and 0.79 [0.64-0.98]). Compared with women with an IPI of 6 to 12 months, women with shorter IPIs (<3 and 3 to <6 months) had a higher risk of total pregnancy loss (AOR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.31-2.67] and 1.29 [1.00-1.66], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that delaying the next FET for at least 6 months after a preceding CPL was associated with beneficial pregnancy outcomes, considering that a decreased likelihood of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth was observed among women with shorter IPIs. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. American Medical Association 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10618845/ /pubmed/37906188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40709 Text en Copyright 2023 Wang Z et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Wang, Ze
Meng, Yueru
Shang, Xue
Suo, Lu
Zhao, Dingying
Han, Xinwei
Yang, Min
Yin, Mengfei
Miao, Haozhe
Wang, Yixuan
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title_full Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title_fullStr Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title_short Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
title_sort interpregnancy interval after clinical pregnancy loss and outcomes of the next frozen embryo transfer
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37906188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40709
work_keys_str_mv AT wangze interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT mengyueru interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT shangxue interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT suolu interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT zhaodingying interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT hanxinwei interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT yangmin interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT yinmengfei interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT miaohaozhe interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT wangyixuan interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT yanghuiming interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT yuyunhai interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT weidaimin interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer
AT chenzijiang interpregnancyintervalafterclinicalpregnancylossandoutcomesofthenextfrozenembryotransfer