Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as compared with gemcitabine, is non-inferior in terms of overall survival (OS) and is associated with lower hematologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Zhou, Tang, Hui, Ying, Jinrong, Cheng, Yuejuan, Wang, Xiang, Wang, Yingyi, Bai, Chunmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Compuscript 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646237
http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0189
_version_ 1785129885149167616
author Zhu, Zhou
Tang, Hui
Ying, Jinrong
Cheng, Yuejuan
Wang, Xiang
Wang, Yingyi
Bai, Chunmei
author_facet Zhu, Zhou
Tang, Hui
Ying, Jinrong
Cheng, Yuejuan
Wang, Xiang
Wang, Yingyi
Bai, Chunmei
author_sort Zhu, Zhou
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as compared with gemcitabine, is non-inferior in terms of overall survival (OS) and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity. Accordingly, S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC. This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) vs. GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC. METHODS: Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were assessed, of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP. The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP (50.0% vs. 30.3%, P = 0.0028). The objective response rate (ORR) was slightly higher (14.3% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.35), and the median OS was significantly longer (17.9 months vs. 13.3 months, P = 0.0078), in the GS group than the GnP group. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between groups. Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group (14.9% vs. 28.1%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC, the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen. The PFS, ORR, and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10618946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Compuscript
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106189462023-11-02 Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Zhu, Zhou Tang, Hui Ying, Jinrong Cheng, Yuejuan Wang, Xiang Wang, Yingyi Bai, Chunmei Cancer Biol Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as compared with gemcitabine, is non-inferior in terms of overall survival (OS) and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity. Accordingly, S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC. This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) vs. GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC. METHODS: Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were assessed, of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP. The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP (50.0% vs. 30.3%, P = 0.0028). The objective response rate (ORR) was slightly higher (14.3% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.35), and the median OS was significantly longer (17.9 months vs. 13.3 months, P = 0.0078), in the GS group than the GnP group. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between groups. Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group (14.9% vs. 28.1%, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC, the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen. The PFS, ORR, and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups. Compuscript 2023-10-15 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10618946/ /pubmed/37646237 http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0189 Text en Copyright: © 2023, Cancer Biology & Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhu, Zhou
Tang, Hui
Ying, Jinrong
Cheng, Yuejuan
Wang, Xiang
Wang, Yingyi
Bai, Chunmei
Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_short Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_sort efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus s-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646237
http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0189
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuzhou efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT tanghui efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT yingjinrong efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT chengyuejuan efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT wangxiang efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT wangyingyi efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT baichunmei efficacyandsafetyofgemcitabinepluss1vsgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelintreatmentnaiveadvancedpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma