Cargando…
Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Assistive and service robots have been increasingly designed and deployed in long-term care (LTC) but little evidence guides their use. This scoping review synthesises existing studies on facilitators and barriers to using artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled robots with older adults i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075278 |
_version_ | 1785129909434187776 |
---|---|
author | Hung, Lillian Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joey Park, Juyoung Mousavi, Hossein Zhao, Hui |
author_facet | Hung, Lillian Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joey Park, Juyoung Mousavi, Hossein Zhao, Hui |
author_sort | Hung, Lillian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Assistive and service robots have been increasingly designed and deployed in long-term care (LTC) but little evidence guides their use. This scoping review synthesises existing studies on facilitators and barriers to using artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled robots with older adults in LTC settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute’s scoping review methodology for the study, to be conducted from November 2023 to April 2024. We will focus on literature exploring the use of AI-enabled robots with older adults in an LTC setting from healthcare providers’ perspectives. Three steps will be taken: (a) keywords and index terms will be identified from MEDLINE and CINAHL databases; (b) comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, AgeLine, PsycINFO, ProQuest and Google, using keywords and index terms identified in step (a); and (c) examining reference lists of the included studies and selecting items in the reference lists which meet the inclusion criteria. Searches for grey literature will also be conducted via Google. The results will be presented in a charting table and a narrative summary will be presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval and participation consent are not required because the data are publicly available. The results will be presented via a journal article and conference presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10619074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106190742023-11-02 Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol Hung, Lillian Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joey Park, Juyoung Mousavi, Hossein Zhao, Hui BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Assistive and service robots have been increasingly designed and deployed in long-term care (LTC) but little evidence guides their use. This scoping review synthesises existing studies on facilitators and barriers to using artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled robots with older adults in LTC settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute’s scoping review methodology for the study, to be conducted from November 2023 to April 2024. We will focus on literature exploring the use of AI-enabled robots with older adults in an LTC setting from healthcare providers’ perspectives. Three steps will be taken: (a) keywords and index terms will be identified from MEDLINE and CINAHL databases; (b) comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, AgeLine, PsycINFO, ProQuest and Google, using keywords and index terms identified in step (a); and (c) examining reference lists of the included studies and selecting items in the reference lists which meet the inclusion criteria. Searches for grey literature will also be conducted via Google. The results will be presented in a charting table and a narrative summary will be presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval and participation consent are not required because the data are publicly available. The results will be presented via a journal article and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10619074/ /pubmed/37903609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075278 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Hung, Lillian Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joey Park, Juyoung Mousavi, Hossein Zhao, Hui Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title | Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Facilitators and barriers to using AI-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | facilitators and barriers to using ai-enabled robots with older adults in long-term care from staff perspective: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunglillian facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol AT wongkarenlokyi facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol AT wongjoey facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol AT parkjuyoung facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol AT mousavihossein facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol AT zhaohui facilitatorsandbarrierstousingaienabledrobotswitholderadultsinlongtermcarefromstaffperspectiveascopingreviewprotocol |