Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Given the inconclusive literature on operative time, pain relief, functional outcomes, and complications, this meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) and Micro-Endoscopic Discectomy (MED) in treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Hai, Su, Nan, Lin, Jisheng, Fei, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04322-2
_version_ 1785129939886931968
author Meng, Hai
Su, Nan
Lin, Jisheng
Fei, Qi
author_facet Meng, Hai
Su, Nan
Lin, Jisheng
Fei, Qi
author_sort Meng, Hai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the inconclusive literature on operative time, pain relief, functional outcomes, and complications, this meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) and Micro-Endoscopic Discectomy (MED) in treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS). METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and based on the PICO framework. The study interrogated four primary databases—PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library—on August 16, 2023, without time restrictions. The search employed a strategic selection of keywords and was devoid of language barriers. Studies were included based on strict criteria, such as the diagnosis, surgical intervention types, and specific outcome measures. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and statistical analysis was executed through Stata version 17. RESULTS: The meta-analysis incorporated 9 articles out of an initial yield of 1,136 potential studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in surgical duration, but no statistically significant difference was identified (MD = − 2.11, P = 0.56). For VAS scores assessing lumbar and leg pain, UBE was statistically superior to MED (MD = − 0.18, P = 0.013; MD = − 0.15, P = 0.006, respectively). ODI scores demonstrated no significant difference between the two surgical methods (MD = − 0.57, P = 0.26). UBE had a lower incidence of complications compared to those receiving MED (OR = 0.54, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: UBE and MED exhibited comparable surgical durations and disability outcomes as measured by ODI. However, UBE demonstrated superior efficacy in alleviating lumbar and leg pain based on VAS scores. The findings present an intricate evaluation of the two surgical interventions for DLSS, lending valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106192222023-11-02 Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Meng, Hai Su, Nan Lin, Jisheng Fei, Qi J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Given the inconclusive literature on operative time, pain relief, functional outcomes, and complications, this meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) and Micro-Endoscopic Discectomy (MED) in treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS). METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and based on the PICO framework. The study interrogated four primary databases—PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library—on August 16, 2023, without time restrictions. The search employed a strategic selection of keywords and was devoid of language barriers. Studies were included based on strict criteria, such as the diagnosis, surgical intervention types, and specific outcome measures. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and statistical analysis was executed through Stata version 17. RESULTS: The meta-analysis incorporated 9 articles out of an initial yield of 1,136 potential studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in surgical duration, but no statistically significant difference was identified (MD = − 2.11, P = 0.56). For VAS scores assessing lumbar and leg pain, UBE was statistically superior to MED (MD = − 0.18, P = 0.013; MD = − 0.15, P = 0.006, respectively). ODI scores demonstrated no significant difference between the two surgical methods (MD = − 0.57, P = 0.26). UBE had a lower incidence of complications compared to those receiving MED (OR = 0.54, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: UBE and MED exhibited comparable surgical durations and disability outcomes as measured by ODI. However, UBE demonstrated superior efficacy in alleviating lumbar and leg pain based on VAS scores. The findings present an intricate evaluation of the two surgical interventions for DLSS, lending valuable insights for clinical decision-making. BioMed Central 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10619222/ /pubmed/37907922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04322-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meng, Hai
Su, Nan
Lin, Jisheng
Fei, Qi
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy and micro-endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04322-2
work_keys_str_mv AT menghai comparativeefficacyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyandmicroendoscopicdiscectomyinthetreatmentofdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunan comparativeefficacyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyandmicroendoscopicdiscectomyinthetreatmentofdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linjisheng comparativeefficacyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyandmicroendoscopicdiscectomyinthetreatmentofdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT feiqi comparativeefficacyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyandmicroendoscopicdiscectomyinthetreatmentofdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis