Cargando…
Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis
BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that in a Japanese national university’s medical faculty, overall paper publication frequency increased between 1979–1980 and 2017–2018, while original paper publication did not increase. Further, publication language changed from predominantly Japanese to Eng...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00302-0 |
_version_ | 1785129949013737472 |
---|---|
author | Muller, Theron Takano, Miho Gallagher, Nicole |
author_facet | Muller, Theron Takano, Miho Gallagher, Nicole |
author_sort | Muller, Theron |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that in a Japanese national university’s medical faculty, overall paper publication frequency increased between 1979–1980 and 2017–2018, while original paper publication did not increase. Further, publication language changed from predominantly Japanese to English. However, whether these trends are specific to medicine or representative of other faculties remains unclear. METHODS: We diachronically analyzed annual university library-produced publication reports for four pharmaceutical and three medical units between 1979–1980 and 2019–2020, elucidating how publication frequency, type, and language medium changed. RESULTS: All publication types increased for the pharmaceutical faculty, from 2.87 per faculty member per year to 10.77. Publication of original papers more than doubled, from 1.06 per faculty member per year to 2.37. This increase was exclusively in English publication, with no publication of Japanese original papers in 2019–2020. This contrasts with medicine, which, while it demonstrated similar increases in all publication types combined, from 4.92 papers per faculty member per year to 12.78, did not demonstrate as striking an increase in total original paper publication (English and Japanese), from 1.21 papers per faculty member per year to 1.30. However, these two faculties observed similar trends in that English largely replaced Japanese original paper publication. That both faculties’ Japanese original paper publication decreased suggests English language original paper publication comes at the expense of publishing in Japanese. Concerning both faculties together, the increase in publishing frequency for all publication types more than tripled from 4.01 to 12.38. This was largely driven by changes in conference paper publication for the pharmaceutical sciences faculty, where English publication increased 2,775% (0.06 to 1.7 papers per faculty member per year) and Japanese language publication 258% (1.33 to 4.77). While conference paper publication did increase for the medical sciences, its change in total publication frequency was largely driven by ‘other’ types of publication, which increased from 0.51 publications per faculty member per year in 1979–1980 to 5.41 in 2019–2020, largely driven by Japanese language publication. CONCLUSION: In 2019–2020, pharmaceutical sciences faculty members largely published original papers in English, so postgraduate education should consider the future likelihood of graduates needing to publish in English. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-023-00302-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10619260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106192602023-11-02 Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis Muller, Theron Takano, Miho Gallagher, Nicole J Pharm Health Care Sci Short Report BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that in a Japanese national university’s medical faculty, overall paper publication frequency increased between 1979–1980 and 2017–2018, while original paper publication did not increase. Further, publication language changed from predominantly Japanese to English. However, whether these trends are specific to medicine or representative of other faculties remains unclear. METHODS: We diachronically analyzed annual university library-produced publication reports for four pharmaceutical and three medical units between 1979–1980 and 2019–2020, elucidating how publication frequency, type, and language medium changed. RESULTS: All publication types increased for the pharmaceutical faculty, from 2.87 per faculty member per year to 10.77. Publication of original papers more than doubled, from 1.06 per faculty member per year to 2.37. This increase was exclusively in English publication, with no publication of Japanese original papers in 2019–2020. This contrasts with medicine, which, while it demonstrated similar increases in all publication types combined, from 4.92 papers per faculty member per year to 12.78, did not demonstrate as striking an increase in total original paper publication (English and Japanese), from 1.21 papers per faculty member per year to 1.30. However, these two faculties observed similar trends in that English largely replaced Japanese original paper publication. That both faculties’ Japanese original paper publication decreased suggests English language original paper publication comes at the expense of publishing in Japanese. Concerning both faculties together, the increase in publishing frequency for all publication types more than tripled from 4.01 to 12.38. This was largely driven by changes in conference paper publication for the pharmaceutical sciences faculty, where English publication increased 2,775% (0.06 to 1.7 papers per faculty member per year) and Japanese language publication 258% (1.33 to 4.77). While conference paper publication did increase for the medical sciences, its change in total publication frequency was largely driven by ‘other’ types of publication, which increased from 0.51 publications per faculty member per year in 1979–1980 to 5.41 in 2019–2020, largely driven by Japanese language publication. CONCLUSION: In 2019–2020, pharmaceutical sciences faculty members largely published original papers in English, so postgraduate education should consider the future likelihood of graduates needing to publish in English. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-023-00302-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10619260/ /pubmed/37907969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00302-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Muller, Theron Takano, Miho Gallagher, Nicole Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title | Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title_full | Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title_fullStr | Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title_short | Faculty publication trends in a Japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
title_sort | faculty publication trends in a japanese national university: a diachronic document analysis |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37907969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00302-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullertheron facultypublicationtrendsinajapanesenationaluniversityadiachronicdocumentanalysis AT takanomiho facultypublicationtrendsinajapanesenationaluniversityadiachronicdocumentanalysis AT gallaghernicole facultypublicationtrendsinajapanesenationaluniversityadiachronicdocumentanalysis |