Cargando…
Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z |
_version_ | 1785129957836455936 |
---|---|
author | Bruce, Lauryn Keeler Kasl, Patrick Soltani, Severine Viswanath, Varun K. Hartogensis, Wendy Dilchert, Stephan Hecht, Frederick M. Chowdhary, Anoushka Anglo, Claudine Pandya, Leena Dasgupta, Subhasis Altintas, Ilkay Gupta, Amarnath Mason, Ashley E. Smarr, Benjamin L. |
author_facet | Bruce, Lauryn Keeler Kasl, Patrick Soltani, Severine Viswanath, Varun K. Hartogensis, Wendy Dilchert, Stephan Hecht, Frederick M. Chowdhary, Anoushka Anglo, Claudine Pandya, Leena Dasgupta, Subhasis Altintas, Ilkay Gupta, Amarnath Mason, Ashley E. Smarr, Benjamin L. |
author_sort | Bruce, Lauryn Keeler |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of pooled random samples. But not all variance in samples is random. Human biometrics are continuously changing in response to stimuli and biological rhythms; single measurements taken sporadically do not easily support exploration of variance across time scales. Recently we reported that in mice, core body temperature measured longitudinally shows higher variance in males than cycling females, both within and across individuals at multiple time scales. METHODS: Here, we explore longitudinal human distal body temperature, measured by a wearable sensor device (Oura Ring), for 6 months in females and males ranging in age from 20 to 79 years. In this study, we did not limit the comparisons to female versus male, but instead we developed a method for categorizing individuals as cyclic or acyclic depending on the presence of a roughly monthly pattern to their nightly temperature. We then compared structure and variance across time scales using multiple standard instruments. RESULTS: Sex differences exist as expected, but across multiple statistical comparisons and timescales, there was no one group that consistently exceeded the others in variance. When variability was assessed across time, females, whether or not their temperature contained monthly cycles, did not significantly differ from males both on daily and monthly time scales. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contradict the viewpoint that human females are too variable across menstrual cycles to include in biomedical research. Longitudinal temperature of females does not accumulate greater measurement error over time than do males and the majority of unexplained variance is within sex category, not between them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10619297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106192972023-11-02 Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex Bruce, Lauryn Keeler Kasl, Patrick Soltani, Severine Viswanath, Varun K. Hartogensis, Wendy Dilchert, Stephan Hecht, Frederick M. Chowdhary, Anoushka Anglo, Claudine Pandya, Leena Dasgupta, Subhasis Altintas, Ilkay Gupta, Amarnath Mason, Ashley E. Smarr, Benjamin L. Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of pooled random samples. But not all variance in samples is random. Human biometrics are continuously changing in response to stimuli and biological rhythms; single measurements taken sporadically do not easily support exploration of variance across time scales. Recently we reported that in mice, core body temperature measured longitudinally shows higher variance in males than cycling females, both within and across individuals at multiple time scales. METHODS: Here, we explore longitudinal human distal body temperature, measured by a wearable sensor device (Oura Ring), for 6 months in females and males ranging in age from 20 to 79 years. In this study, we did not limit the comparisons to female versus male, but instead we developed a method for categorizing individuals as cyclic or acyclic depending on the presence of a roughly monthly pattern to their nightly temperature. We then compared structure and variance across time scales using multiple standard instruments. RESULTS: Sex differences exist as expected, but across multiple statistical comparisons and timescales, there was no one group that consistently exceeded the others in variance. When variability was assessed across time, females, whether or not their temperature contained monthly cycles, did not significantly differ from males both on daily and monthly time scales. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contradict the viewpoint that human females are too variable across menstrual cycles to include in biomedical research. Longitudinal temperature of females does not accumulate greater measurement error over time than do males and the majority of unexplained variance is within sex category, not between them. BioMed Central 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10619297/ /pubmed/37915069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bruce, Lauryn Keeler Kasl, Patrick Soltani, Severine Viswanath, Varun K. Hartogensis, Wendy Dilchert, Stephan Hecht, Frederick M. Chowdhary, Anoushka Anglo, Claudine Pandya, Leena Dasgupta, Subhasis Altintas, Ilkay Gupta, Amarnath Mason, Ashley E. Smarr, Benjamin L. Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title | Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title_full | Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title_fullStr | Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title_short | Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
title_sort | variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brucelaurynkeeler variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT kaslpatrick variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT soltaniseverine variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT viswanathvarunk variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT hartogensiswendy variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT dilchertstephan variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT hechtfrederickm variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT chowdharyanoushka variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT angloclaudine variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT pandyaleena variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT dasguptasubhasis variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT altintasilkay variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT guptaamarnath variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT masonashleye variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex AT smarrbenjaminl variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex |