Cargando…

Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex

BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruce, Lauryn Keeler, Kasl, Patrick, Soltani, Severine, Viswanath, Varun K., Hartogensis, Wendy, Dilchert, Stephan, Hecht, Frederick M., Chowdhary, Anoushka, Anglo, Claudine, Pandya, Leena, Dasgupta, Subhasis, Altintas, Ilkay, Gupta, Amarnath, Mason, Ashley E., Smarr, Benjamin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z
_version_ 1785129957836455936
author Bruce, Lauryn Keeler
Kasl, Patrick
Soltani, Severine
Viswanath, Varun K.
Hartogensis, Wendy
Dilchert, Stephan
Hecht, Frederick M.
Chowdhary, Anoushka
Anglo, Claudine
Pandya, Leena
Dasgupta, Subhasis
Altintas, Ilkay
Gupta, Amarnath
Mason, Ashley E.
Smarr, Benjamin L.
author_facet Bruce, Lauryn Keeler
Kasl, Patrick
Soltani, Severine
Viswanath, Varun K.
Hartogensis, Wendy
Dilchert, Stephan
Hecht, Frederick M.
Chowdhary, Anoushka
Anglo, Claudine
Pandya, Leena
Dasgupta, Subhasis
Altintas, Ilkay
Gupta, Amarnath
Mason, Ashley E.
Smarr, Benjamin L.
author_sort Bruce, Lauryn Keeler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of pooled random samples. But not all variance in samples is random. Human biometrics are continuously changing in response to stimuli and biological rhythms; single measurements taken sporadically do not easily support exploration of variance across time scales. Recently we reported that in mice, core body temperature measured longitudinally shows higher variance in males than cycling females, both within and across individuals at multiple time scales. METHODS: Here, we explore longitudinal human distal body temperature, measured by a wearable sensor device (Oura Ring), for 6 months in females and males ranging in age from 20 to 79 years. In this study, we did not limit the comparisons to female versus male, but instead we developed a method for categorizing individuals as cyclic or acyclic depending on the presence of a roughly monthly pattern to their nightly temperature. We then compared structure and variance across time scales using multiple standard instruments. RESULTS: Sex differences exist as expected, but across multiple statistical comparisons and timescales, there was no one group that consistently exceeded the others in variance. When variability was assessed across time, females, whether or not their temperature contained monthly cycles, did not significantly differ from males both on daily and monthly time scales. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contradict the viewpoint that human females are too variable across menstrual cycles to include in biomedical research. Longitudinal temperature of females does not accumulate greater measurement error over time than do males and the majority of unexplained variance is within sex category, not between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106192972023-11-02 Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex Bruce, Lauryn Keeler Kasl, Patrick Soltani, Severine Viswanath, Varun K. Hartogensis, Wendy Dilchert, Stephan Hecht, Frederick M. Chowdhary, Anoushka Anglo, Claudine Pandya, Leena Dasgupta, Subhasis Altintas, Ilkay Gupta, Amarnath Mason, Ashley E. Smarr, Benjamin L. Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Females have been historically excluded from biomedical research due in part to the documented presumption that results with male subjects will generalize effectively to females. This has been justified in part by the assumption that ovarian rhythms will increase the overall variance of pooled random samples. But not all variance in samples is random. Human biometrics are continuously changing in response to stimuli and biological rhythms; single measurements taken sporadically do not easily support exploration of variance across time scales. Recently we reported that in mice, core body temperature measured longitudinally shows higher variance in males than cycling females, both within and across individuals at multiple time scales. METHODS: Here, we explore longitudinal human distal body temperature, measured by a wearable sensor device (Oura Ring), for 6 months in females and males ranging in age from 20 to 79 years. In this study, we did not limit the comparisons to female versus male, but instead we developed a method for categorizing individuals as cyclic or acyclic depending on the presence of a roughly monthly pattern to their nightly temperature. We then compared structure and variance across time scales using multiple standard instruments. RESULTS: Sex differences exist as expected, but across multiple statistical comparisons and timescales, there was no one group that consistently exceeded the others in variance. When variability was assessed across time, females, whether or not their temperature contained monthly cycles, did not significantly differ from males both on daily and monthly time scales. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contradict the viewpoint that human females are too variable across menstrual cycles to include in biomedical research. Longitudinal temperature of females does not accumulate greater measurement error over time than do males and the majority of unexplained variance is within sex category, not between them. BioMed Central 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10619297/ /pubmed/37915069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bruce, Lauryn Keeler
Kasl, Patrick
Soltani, Severine
Viswanath, Varun K.
Hartogensis, Wendy
Dilchert, Stephan
Hecht, Frederick M.
Chowdhary, Anoushka
Anglo, Claudine
Pandya, Leena
Dasgupta, Subhasis
Altintas, Ilkay
Gupta, Amarnath
Mason, Ashley E.
Smarr, Benjamin L.
Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title_full Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title_fullStr Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title_full_unstemmed Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title_short Variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
title_sort variability of temperature measurements recorded by a wearable device by biological sex
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00558-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brucelaurynkeeler variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT kaslpatrick variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT soltaniseverine variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT viswanathvarunk variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT hartogensiswendy variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT dilchertstephan variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT hechtfrederickm variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT chowdharyanoushka variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT angloclaudine variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT pandyaleena variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT dasguptasubhasis variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT altintasilkay variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT guptaamarnath variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT masonashleye variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex
AT smarrbenjaminl variabilityoftemperaturemeasurementsrecordedbyawearabledevicebybiologicalsex