Cargando…

Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging

Upper extremity motor paradigms during spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can provide insight into the functional organization of the cord. Hand‐grasping is an important daily function with clinical significance, but previous studies of similar squeezing movements have not repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemmerling, Kimberly J., Hoggarth, Mark A., Sandhu, Milap S., Parrish, Todd B., Bright, Molly G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26458
_version_ 1785129977002328064
author Hemmerling, Kimberly J.
Hoggarth, Mark A.
Sandhu, Milap S.
Parrish, Todd B.
Bright, Molly G.
author_facet Hemmerling, Kimberly J.
Hoggarth, Mark A.
Sandhu, Milap S.
Parrish, Todd B.
Bright, Molly G.
author_sort Hemmerling, Kimberly J.
collection PubMed
description Upper extremity motor paradigms during spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can provide insight into the functional organization of the cord. Hand‐grasping is an important daily function with clinical significance, but previous studies of similar squeezing movements have not reported consistent areas of activity and are limited by sample size and simplistic analysis methods. Here, we study spinal cord fMRI activation using a unimanual isometric hand‐grasping task that is calibrated to participant maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Two task modeling methods were considered: (1) a task regressor derived from an idealized block design (Ideal) and (2) a task regressor based on the recorded force trace normalized to individual MVC (%MVC). Across these two methods, group motor activity was highly lateralized to the hemicord ipsilateral to the side of the task. Activation spanned C5–C8 and was primarily localized to the C7 spinal cord segment. Specific differences in spatial distribution are also observed, such as an increase in C8 and dorsal cord activity when using the %MVC regressor. Furthermore, we explored the impact of data quantity and spatial smoothing on sensitivity to hand‐grasp motor task activation. This analysis shows a large increase in number of active voxels associated with the number of fMRI runs, sample size, and spatial smoothing, demonstrating the impact of experimental design choices on motor activation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106193822023-11-02 Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging Hemmerling, Kimberly J. Hoggarth, Mark A. Sandhu, Milap S. Parrish, Todd B. Bright, Molly G. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Upper extremity motor paradigms during spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can provide insight into the functional organization of the cord. Hand‐grasping is an important daily function with clinical significance, but previous studies of similar squeezing movements have not reported consistent areas of activity and are limited by sample size and simplistic analysis methods. Here, we study spinal cord fMRI activation using a unimanual isometric hand‐grasping task that is calibrated to participant maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Two task modeling methods were considered: (1) a task regressor derived from an idealized block design (Ideal) and (2) a task regressor based on the recorded force trace normalized to individual MVC (%MVC). Across these two methods, group motor activity was highly lateralized to the hemicord ipsilateral to the side of the task. Activation spanned C5–C8 and was primarily localized to the C7 spinal cord segment. Specific differences in spatial distribution are also observed, such as an increase in C8 and dorsal cord activity when using the %MVC regressor. Furthermore, we explored the impact of data quantity and spatial smoothing on sensitivity to hand‐grasp motor task activation. This analysis shows a large increase in number of active voxels associated with the number of fMRI runs, sample size, and spatial smoothing, demonstrating the impact of experimental design choices on motor activation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10619382/ /pubmed/37608682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26458 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hemmerling, Kimberly J.
Hoggarth, Mark A.
Sandhu, Milap S.
Parrish, Todd B.
Bright, Molly G.
Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort spatial distribution of hand‐grasp motor task activity in spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26458
work_keys_str_mv AT hemmerlingkimberlyj spatialdistributionofhandgraspmotortaskactivityinspinalcordfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hoggarthmarka spatialdistributionofhandgraspmotortaskactivityinspinalcordfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sandhumilaps spatialdistributionofhandgraspmotortaskactivityinspinalcordfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT parrishtoddb spatialdistributionofhandgraspmotortaskactivityinspinalcordfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT brightmollyg spatialdistributionofhandgraspmotortaskactivityinspinalcordfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging