Cargando…

Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage

Structural characterization of the recognition of ubiquitin (Ub) by deubiquitin­ases (DUBs) has largely relied on covalent complexation of the DUB through its catalytic cysteine with a Ub C-terminal electrophile. The Ub electrophiles are accessed through intein chemistry in conjunction with chemical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negron Teron, Kristos I., Das, Chittaranjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798323008501
_version_ 1785129987281518592
author Negron Teron, Kristos I.
Das, Chittaranjan
author_facet Negron Teron, Kristos I.
Das, Chittaranjan
author_sort Negron Teron, Kristos I.
collection PubMed
description Structural characterization of the recognition of ubiquitin (Ub) by deubiquitin­ases (DUBs) has largely relied on covalent complexation of the DUB through its catalytic cysteine with a Ub C-terminal electrophile. The Ub electrophiles are accessed through intein chemistry in conjunction with chemical synthesis. Here, it was asked whether DUB–Ub covalent complexes could instead be accessed by simpler disulfide chemistry using a Ub cysteine mutant in which the last glycine has been replaced with a cysteine. The Ub cysteine mutant displayed a wide variability in disulfide formation across a panel of eukaryotic and prokaryotic DUBs, with some showing no detectable reaction while others robustly produced a disulfide complex. Using this approach, two disulfide-linked ubiquitin-bound complexes were crystallized, one involving the Legionella pneumophila effector SdeA DUB and the other involving the Orientia effector OtDUB. These DUBs had previously been crystallized in Ub-bound forms using the C-terminal electrophile strategy and noncovalent complexation, respectively. While the disulfide-linked SdeA DUB–Ub complex crystallized as expected, in the OtDUB complex the disulfide bond to the Ub mutant involved a cysteine that differed from the catalytic cysteine. Disulfide formation with the SdeA DUB catalytic cysteine was accompanied by local distortion of the helix carrying the active-site cysteine, whereas OtDUB reacted with the Ub mutant using a surface-exposed cysteine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106194262023-11-02 Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage Negron Teron, Kristos I. Das, Chittaranjan Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol Research Papers Structural characterization of the recognition of ubiquitin (Ub) by deubiquitin­ases (DUBs) has largely relied on covalent complexation of the DUB through its catalytic cysteine with a Ub C-terminal electrophile. The Ub electrophiles are accessed through intein chemistry in conjunction with chemical synthesis. Here, it was asked whether DUB–Ub covalent complexes could instead be accessed by simpler disulfide chemistry using a Ub cysteine mutant in which the last glycine has been replaced with a cysteine. The Ub cysteine mutant displayed a wide variability in disulfide formation across a panel of eukaryotic and prokaryotic DUBs, with some showing no detectable reaction while others robustly produced a disulfide complex. Using this approach, two disulfide-linked ubiquitin-bound complexes were crystallized, one involving the Legionella pneumophila effector SdeA DUB and the other involving the Orientia effector OtDUB. These DUBs had previously been crystallized in Ub-bound forms using the C-terminal electrophile strategy and noncovalent complexation, respectively. While the disulfide-linked SdeA DUB–Ub complex crystallized as expected, in the OtDUB complex the disulfide bond to the Ub mutant involved a cysteine that differed from the catalytic cysteine. Disulfide formation with the SdeA DUB catalytic cysteine was accompanied by local distortion of the helix carrying the active-site cysteine, whereas OtDUB reacted with the Ub mutant using a surface-exposed cysteine. International Union of Crystallography 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10619426/ /pubmed/37877948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798323008501 Text en © Negron and Das 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Negron Teron, Kristos I.
Das, Chittaranjan
Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title_full Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title_fullStr Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title_full_unstemmed Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title_short Cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
title_sort cocrystallization of ubiquitin–deubiquitinase complexes through disulfide linkage
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798323008501
work_keys_str_mv AT negronteronkristosi cocrystallizationofubiquitindeubiquitinasecomplexesthroughdisulfidelinkage
AT daschittaranjan cocrystallizationofubiquitindeubiquitinasecomplexesthroughdisulfidelinkage