Human papillomavirus testing on self‐collected samples to detect high‐grade cervical lesions in rural Bhutan: The REACH‐Bhutan study

BACKGROUND: “REACH‐Bhutan” aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical performance of a community‐based screening program for cervical cancer in rural Bhutan using self‐collected samples for high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) testing. METHODS: In April/May 2016, 2590 women aged 30–60 years were screened across rural Bhutan by providing a self‐collected sample for careHPV testing. All careHPV‐positive women, plus a random sample of careHPV‐negative women, were recalled for colposcopy and biopsy. Self‐samples also underwent GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based HR‐HPV DNA detection and genotyping. Cross‐sectional screening indices were estimated against histological high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (hHSIL+), including imputation of hHSIL+ in women without colposcopy. RESULTS: HR‐HPV positivity was 10.2% by careHPV and 14.8% by GP5+/6+ PCR. Twenty‐two cases of hHSIL+ were histologically diagnosed, including one invasive cancer; an additional 7 hHSIL+ were imputed in women without colposcopy. HR‐HPV testing by GP5+/6+ showed higher sensitivity for hHSIL+ (89.7%, 95% CI 72.6–97.8) than careHPV (75.9%, 95% CI 56.5–89.7). Negative predictive value was also slightly higher for GP5+/6+ (99.9%, 95% CI 99.6–100) than careHPV (99.7%, 95% CI 99.4–99.9). Specificity, however, was lower for GP5+/6+ (86.1%, 95% CI 84.6–87.4) than careHPV (90.6%, 95% CI 89.4–91.7), as was positive predictive value (6.9%, 95% CI 4.5–9.9 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI 5.4–12.6). Of 377 HR‐HPV‐positive women by GP5+/6+, 173 (45.9%) were careHPV‐positive, including 54.7% HPV16‐positive and 30.2% HPV18‐positive women. CONCLUSIONS: The final REACH‐Bhutan results show that screening for cervical cancer with self‐collection of samples and HR‐HPV testing, in addition to our previous report of achieving high participation, can also perform well to detect women with hHSIL+.