Cargando…
Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690 |
_version_ | 1785130020684955648 |
---|---|
author | Zegrea, Adrian Ojala, Emilia Suvitie, Pia Varpe, Pirita Huhtinen, Heikki Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna Rautio, Tero Härkki, Päivi Salmenkylä, Sinikka Ukkonen, Mika Lavonius, Maija Pinta, Tarja |
author_facet | Zegrea, Adrian Ojala, Emilia Suvitie, Pia Varpe, Pirita Huhtinen, Heikki Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna Rautio, Tero Härkki, Päivi Salmenkylä, Sinikka Ukkonen, Mika Lavonius, Maija Pinta, Tarja |
author_sort | Zegrea, Adrian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective pilot study was started in 2017 and includes patients with chronic pelvic pain with no other obvious pathology than endometriosis. Other treatment options have been tried or they are unsuitable. Patients underwent SNM implantation. The main outcome was postoperative pain reduction and secondary outcome was quality of life. The following questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes: Brief pain inventory (BPI), clinical global impression ‐ improvement (CGI‐I), 15D‐measure of health‐related quality of life, and Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent the SNM procedure and, at the time of analysis, 15 patients had returned one‐year questionnaires. The patients had a history of endometriosis for a median of 5.5 (interquartile range 2–9) years, with no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the duration of the disease (p = 0.158). A total of 31 patients (89%) were implanted with the internal pulse generator. There were statistically significant changes in BPI pain‐related items. Worst experienced daily pain decreased among those who returned 12‐month questionnaires from median 9 to 5 (p = 0.006), average daily pain from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.004), and least daily pain from 3 to 1 (p = 0.004). Based on the CGI questionnaire (n = 14), at 12 months nine patients (60%) experienced great improvement in their symptoms, three patients (20%) much improvement and two patients (13%) minimal improvement. None of the patients experienced worsening of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant change in overall 15D score at 1 month (p < 0.001), 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.018), when the results were compared to baseline values. Median B&B score also improved significantly and decreased from a baseline value of 8 (4–12) to 4.5 (0–6), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preliminary findings of our study, SNM might be a promising treatment of CPP in endometriosis patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10619602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106196022023-11-02 Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain Zegrea, Adrian Ojala, Emilia Suvitie, Pia Varpe, Pirita Huhtinen, Heikki Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna Rautio, Tero Härkki, Päivi Salmenkylä, Sinikka Ukkonen, Mika Lavonius, Maija Pinta, Tarja Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Gynecology INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective pilot study was started in 2017 and includes patients with chronic pelvic pain with no other obvious pathology than endometriosis. Other treatment options have been tried or they are unsuitable. Patients underwent SNM implantation. The main outcome was postoperative pain reduction and secondary outcome was quality of life. The following questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes: Brief pain inventory (BPI), clinical global impression ‐ improvement (CGI‐I), 15D‐measure of health‐related quality of life, and Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent the SNM procedure and, at the time of analysis, 15 patients had returned one‐year questionnaires. The patients had a history of endometriosis for a median of 5.5 (interquartile range 2–9) years, with no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the duration of the disease (p = 0.158). A total of 31 patients (89%) were implanted with the internal pulse generator. There were statistically significant changes in BPI pain‐related items. Worst experienced daily pain decreased among those who returned 12‐month questionnaires from median 9 to 5 (p = 0.006), average daily pain from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.004), and least daily pain from 3 to 1 (p = 0.004). Based on the CGI questionnaire (n = 14), at 12 months nine patients (60%) experienced great improvement in their symptoms, three patients (20%) much improvement and two patients (13%) minimal improvement. None of the patients experienced worsening of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant change in overall 15D score at 1 month (p < 0.001), 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.018), when the results were compared to baseline values. Median B&B score also improved significantly and decreased from a baseline value of 8 (4–12) to 4.5 (0–6), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preliminary findings of our study, SNM might be a promising treatment of CPP in endometriosis patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10619602/ /pubmed/37814355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Gynecology Zegrea, Adrian Ojala, Emilia Suvitie, Pia Varpe, Pirita Huhtinen, Heikki Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna Rautio, Tero Härkki, Päivi Salmenkylä, Sinikka Ukkonen, Mika Lavonius, Maija Pinta, Tarja Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title | Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title_full | Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title_fullStr | Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title_short | Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
title_sort | sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – a promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain |
topic | Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zegreaadrian sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT ojalaemilia sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT suvitiepia sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT varpepirita sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT huhtinenheikki sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT makelakaikkonenjohanna sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT rautiotero sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT harkkipaivi sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT salmenkylasinikka sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT ukkonenmika sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT lavoniusmaija sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain AT pintatarja sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain |