Cargando…

Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zegrea, Adrian, Ojala, Emilia, Suvitie, Pia, Varpe, Pirita, Huhtinen, Heikki, Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna, Rautio, Tero, Härkki, Päivi, Salmenkylä, Sinikka, Ukkonen, Mika, Lavonius, Maija, Pinta, Tarja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690
_version_ 1785130020684955648
author Zegrea, Adrian
Ojala, Emilia
Suvitie, Pia
Varpe, Pirita
Huhtinen, Heikki
Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna
Rautio, Tero
Härkki, Päivi
Salmenkylä, Sinikka
Ukkonen, Mika
Lavonius, Maija
Pinta, Tarja
author_facet Zegrea, Adrian
Ojala, Emilia
Suvitie, Pia
Varpe, Pirita
Huhtinen, Heikki
Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna
Rautio, Tero
Härkki, Päivi
Salmenkylä, Sinikka
Ukkonen, Mika
Lavonius, Maija
Pinta, Tarja
author_sort Zegrea, Adrian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective pilot study was started in 2017 and includes patients with chronic pelvic pain with no other obvious pathology than endometriosis. Other treatment options have been tried or they are unsuitable. Patients underwent SNM implantation. The main outcome was postoperative pain reduction and secondary outcome was quality of life. The following questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes: Brief pain inventory (BPI), clinical global impression ‐ improvement (CGI‐I), 15D‐measure of health‐related quality of life, and Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent the SNM procedure and, at the time of analysis, 15 patients had returned one‐year questionnaires. The patients had a history of endometriosis for a median of 5.5 (interquartile range 2–9) years, with no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the duration of the disease (p = 0.158). A total of 31 patients (89%) were implanted with the internal pulse generator. There were statistically significant changes in BPI pain‐related items. Worst experienced daily pain decreased among those who returned 12‐month questionnaires from median 9 to 5 (p = 0.006), average daily pain from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.004), and least daily pain from 3 to 1 (p = 0.004). Based on the CGI questionnaire (n = 14), at 12 months nine patients (60%) experienced great improvement in their symptoms, three patients (20%) much improvement and two patients (13%) minimal improvement. None of the patients experienced worsening of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant change in overall 15D score at 1 month (p < 0.001), 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.018), when the results were compared to baseline values. Median B&B score also improved significantly and decreased from a baseline value of 8 (4–12) to 4.5 (0–6), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preliminary findings of our study, SNM might be a promising treatment of CPP in endometriosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106196022023-11-02 Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain Zegrea, Adrian Ojala, Emilia Suvitie, Pia Varpe, Pirita Huhtinen, Heikki Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna Rautio, Tero Härkki, Päivi Salmenkylä, Sinikka Ukkonen, Mika Lavonius, Maija Pinta, Tarja Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Gynecology INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter prospective pilot study was started in 2017 and includes patients with chronic pelvic pain with no other obvious pathology than endometriosis. Other treatment options have been tried or they are unsuitable. Patients underwent SNM implantation. The main outcome was postoperative pain reduction and secondary outcome was quality of life. The following questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes: Brief pain inventory (BPI), clinical global impression ‐ improvement (CGI‐I), 15D‐measure of health‐related quality of life, and Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent the SNM procedure and, at the time of analysis, 15 patients had returned one‐year questionnaires. The patients had a history of endometriosis for a median of 5.5 (interquartile range 2–9) years, with no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the duration of the disease (p = 0.158). A total of 31 patients (89%) were implanted with the internal pulse generator. There were statistically significant changes in BPI pain‐related items. Worst experienced daily pain decreased among those who returned 12‐month questionnaires from median 9 to 5 (p = 0.006), average daily pain from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.004), and least daily pain from 3 to 1 (p = 0.004). Based on the CGI questionnaire (n = 14), at 12 months nine patients (60%) experienced great improvement in their symptoms, three patients (20%) much improvement and two patients (13%) minimal improvement. None of the patients experienced worsening of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant change in overall 15D score at 1 month (p < 0.001), 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.018), when the results were compared to baseline values. Median B&B score also improved significantly and decreased from a baseline value of 8 (4–12) to 4.5 (0–6), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preliminary findings of our study, SNM might be a promising treatment of CPP in endometriosis patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10619602/ /pubmed/37814355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Gynecology
Zegrea, Adrian
Ojala, Emilia
Suvitie, Pia
Varpe, Pirita
Huhtinen, Heikki
Mäkelä‐Kaikkonen, Johanna
Rautio, Tero
Härkki, Päivi
Salmenkylä, Sinikka
Ukkonen, Mika
Lavonius, Maija
Pinta, Tarja
Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title_full Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title_fullStr Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title_full_unstemmed Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title_short Sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – A promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
title_sort sacral neuromodulation in endometriosis – a promising treatment option for chronic pelvic pain
topic Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14690
work_keys_str_mv AT zegreaadrian sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT ojalaemilia sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT suvitiepia sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT varpepirita sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT huhtinenheikki sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT makelakaikkonenjohanna sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT rautiotero sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT harkkipaivi sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT salmenkylasinikka sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT ukkonenmika sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT lavoniusmaija sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain
AT pintatarja sacralneuromodulationinendometriosisapromisingtreatmentoptionforchronicpelvicpain