Cargando…

Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study

INTRODUCTION: After incomplete healing of the uterine cesarean section scar, a niche can be observed; 24% of the women develop large niches with a residual myometrial thickness <3 mm. In these cases a laparoscopic resection is possible. The effect of this new treatment on fertility outcome is not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vissers, Jolijn, Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K., Brölmann, Hans A. M., Lambalk, Cornelis B., Huirne, Judith A. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14647
_version_ 1785130022456000512
author Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Brölmann, Hans A. M.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
Huirne, Judith A. F.
author_facet Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Brölmann, Hans A. M.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
Huirne, Judith A. F.
author_sort Vissers, Jolijn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: After incomplete healing of the uterine cesarean section scar, a niche can be observed; 24% of the women develop large niches with a residual myometrial thickness <3 mm. In these cases a laparoscopic resection is possible. The effect of this new treatment on fertility outcome is not known yet. This paper describes reproductive outcomes 2 years after a laparoscopic niche resection and compares women with or without secondary infertility at baseline. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, with consecutive inclusion of women between 2011 and 2019. Women with a niche in the uterine cesarean scar, with a residual myometrial thickness of <3 mm and with a desire to become pregnant, were scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic niche resection because of one or more of the following problems (1) postmenstrual spotting; (2) midcycle intrauterine fluid accumulation diagnosed during the fertility workup or (3) difficulties with a previous embryo transfer and preferring a surgical therapy. The study is registered in the ISRCTN register (ref. no. ISRCTN02271575) on April 23, 2013. RESULTS: There were 133 (62%) women included with a desire to become pregnant, 88 with secondary infertility. In all, 83 had an ongoing pregnancy at the 2‐year follow‐up. The ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with previous fertility problems was 60.2% compared with 66.7% in patients without infertility (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–1.7). The OR for live births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.02–1.2). Overall, 8.3% of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriages by the 2‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The reproductive outcomes in women with and without previous fertility problems undergoing resection of a large niche are very promising and quite comparable in both groups. These results suggest, but do not prove, a beneficial effect of this therapy for these indications. The results support the design of future randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of niche resection vs expectant management to assess its additional value in women with or without fertility problems who desire pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106196092023-11-02 Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study Vissers, Jolijn Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Brölmann, Hans A. M. Lambalk, Cornelis B. Huirne, Judith A. F. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Gynecological Surgery INTRODUCTION: After incomplete healing of the uterine cesarean section scar, a niche can be observed; 24% of the women develop large niches with a residual myometrial thickness <3 mm. In these cases a laparoscopic resection is possible. The effect of this new treatment on fertility outcome is not known yet. This paper describes reproductive outcomes 2 years after a laparoscopic niche resection and compares women with or without secondary infertility at baseline. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, with consecutive inclusion of women between 2011 and 2019. Women with a niche in the uterine cesarean scar, with a residual myometrial thickness of <3 mm and with a desire to become pregnant, were scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic niche resection because of one or more of the following problems (1) postmenstrual spotting; (2) midcycle intrauterine fluid accumulation diagnosed during the fertility workup or (3) difficulties with a previous embryo transfer and preferring a surgical therapy. The study is registered in the ISRCTN register (ref. no. ISRCTN02271575) on April 23, 2013. RESULTS: There were 133 (62%) women included with a desire to become pregnant, 88 with secondary infertility. In all, 83 had an ongoing pregnancy at the 2‐year follow‐up. The ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with previous fertility problems was 60.2% compared with 66.7% in patients without infertility (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–1.7). The OR for live births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.02–1.2). Overall, 8.3% of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriages by the 2‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The reproductive outcomes in women with and without previous fertility problems undergoing resection of a large niche are very promising and quite comparable in both groups. These results suggest, but do not prove, a beneficial effect of this therapy for these indications. The results support the design of future randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of niche resection vs expectant management to assess its additional value in women with or without fertility problems who desire pregnancy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10619609/ /pubmed/37700545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14647 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Gynecological Surgery
Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Brölmann, Hans A. M.
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
Huirne, Judith A. F.
Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title_full Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title_fullStr Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title_short Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long‐term follow‐up on the prospective LAPNICHE study
title_sort reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: long‐term follow‐up on the prospective lapniche study
topic Gynecological Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14647
work_keys_str_mv AT vissersjolijn reproductiveoutcomesafterlaparoscopicresectionofsymptomaticnichesinuterinecesareanscarslongtermfollowupontheprospectivelapnichestudy
AT hehenkampwouterjk reproductiveoutcomesafterlaparoscopicresectionofsymptomaticnichesinuterinecesareanscarslongtermfollowupontheprospectivelapnichestudy
AT brolmannhansam reproductiveoutcomesafterlaparoscopicresectionofsymptomaticnichesinuterinecesareanscarslongtermfollowupontheprospectivelapnichestudy
AT lambalkcornelisb reproductiveoutcomesafterlaparoscopicresectionofsymptomaticnichesinuterinecesareanscarslongtermfollowupontheprospectivelapnichestudy
AT huirnejudithaf reproductiveoutcomesafterlaparoscopicresectionofsymptomaticnichesinuterinecesareanscarslongtermfollowupontheprospectivelapnichestudy