Cargando…

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) is a selective, non-sedating H1 antagonist with anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties, which can be used as an alternative to intranasal corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of 0.1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bousquet, Jean, Klimek, Ludger, Kuhl, Hans-Christian, Nguyen, Duc Tung, Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar, Canonica, G. W., Berger, William E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012
_version_ 1785130078289526784
author Bousquet, Jean
Klimek, Ludger
Kuhl, Hans-Christian
Nguyen, Duc Tung
Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar
Canonica, G. W.
Berger, William E.
author_facet Bousquet, Jean
Klimek, Ludger
Kuhl, Hans-Christian
Nguyen, Duc Tung
Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar
Canonica, G. W.
Berger, William E.
author_sort Bousquet, Jean
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) is a selective, non-sedating H1 antagonist with anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties, which can be used as an alternative to intranasal corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of 0.15% AZE compared to that of the placebo at a dosage of two sprays per nostril twice daily for 4 weeks in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 581 subjects were randomized in this double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled trial (NCT00712920) that compared 0.10% (1,096 μg daily) and 0.15% AZE (1,644 μg daily) to the placebo in PAR patients. The study consisted of a 7-day single-blind placebo lead-in period and a 28-day DB treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 12-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) for the entire 28-day study period of 0.15% AZE, two sprays per nostril BID compared to the placebo. The efficacy and safety of 0.15% AZE were compared to the placebo. RESULTS: Least square (LS) mean improvement from baseline in the morning (AM) and evening (PM) combined rTNSS was statistically significant for the 0.15% AZE group (p = 0.04) compared to the placebo group. LS mean improvement from baseline in the AM and PM combined rTNSS was 4.10 (4.26) units for 0.15% AZE and 3.81 (3.99) for 0.10% AZE. For individual symptoms, there was a statistically significant change in the LS mean (p = 0.04) improvement from baseline on the 12-h reflective assessment for the 0.15% AZE group for runny nose. Further numerical improvements were shown for itchy nose, nasal congestion, runny nose, and sneezing compared to the placebo. No deaths or serious adverse events related to the study medication were reported. CONCLUSION: The present formulation of 0.15% AZE is safe and effective in relieving PAR symptoms. It effectively relieves nasal and non-nasal symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00712920.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106198462023-11-02 A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis Bousquet, Jean Klimek, Ludger Kuhl, Hans-Christian Nguyen, Duc Tung Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar Canonica, G. W. Berger, William E. Front Allergy Allergy BACKGROUND: Azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) is a selective, non-sedating H1 antagonist with anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties, which can be used as an alternative to intranasal corticosteroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new formulation of 0.15% AZE compared to that of the placebo at a dosage of two sprays per nostril twice daily for 4 weeks in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 581 subjects were randomized in this double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled trial (NCT00712920) that compared 0.10% (1,096 μg daily) and 0.15% AZE (1,644 μg daily) to the placebo in PAR patients. The study consisted of a 7-day single-blind placebo lead-in period and a 28-day DB treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 12-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) for the entire 28-day study period of 0.15% AZE, two sprays per nostril BID compared to the placebo. The efficacy and safety of 0.15% AZE were compared to the placebo. RESULTS: Least square (LS) mean improvement from baseline in the morning (AM) and evening (PM) combined rTNSS was statistically significant for the 0.15% AZE group (p = 0.04) compared to the placebo group. LS mean improvement from baseline in the AM and PM combined rTNSS was 4.10 (4.26) units for 0.15% AZE and 3.81 (3.99) for 0.10% AZE. For individual symptoms, there was a statistically significant change in the LS mean (p = 0.04) improvement from baseline on the 12-h reflective assessment for the 0.15% AZE group for runny nose. Further numerical improvements were shown for itchy nose, nasal congestion, runny nose, and sneezing compared to the placebo. No deaths or serious adverse events related to the study medication were reported. CONCLUSION: The present formulation of 0.15% AZE is safe and effective in relieving PAR symptoms. It effectively relieves nasal and non-nasal symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00712920. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10619846/ /pubmed/37920410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012 Text en © 2023 Bousquet, Klimek, Kuhl, Nguyen, Ramalingam, Canonica and Berger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Allergy
Bousquet, Jean
Klimek, Ludger
Kuhl, Hans-Christian
Nguyen, Duc Tung
Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar
Canonica, G. W.
Berger, William E.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title_full A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title_fullStr A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title_full_unstemmed A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title_short A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
title_sort double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of two doses of azelastine hydrochloride in perennial allergic rhinitis
topic Allergy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37920410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1244012
work_keys_str_mv AT bousquetjean adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT klimekludger adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT kuhlhanschristian adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT nguyenductung adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT ramalingamrajeshkumar adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT canonicagw adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT bergerwilliame adoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT bousquetjean doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT klimekludger doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT kuhlhanschristian doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT nguyenductung doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT ramalingamrajeshkumar doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT canonicagw doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis
AT bergerwilliame doubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialoftheefficacyandsafetyoftwodosesofazelastinehydrochlorideinperennialallergicrhinitis