Cargando…

Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery

BACKGROUND: Surgical face masks were originally developed to contain and filter droplets containing microorganisms expelled from the mouth and nasopharynx of healthcare workers during surgery, thereby providing protection for the patient. However, there are several ways in which surgical face masks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipp, Allyson, Edwards, Peggy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619946/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802012000400014
_version_ 1785130103113515008
author Lipp, Allyson
Edwards, Peggy
author_facet Lipp, Allyson
Edwards, Peggy
author_sort Lipp, Allyson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical face masks were originally developed to contain and filter droplets containing microorganisms expelled from the mouth and nasopharynx of healthcare workers during surgery, thereby providing protection for the patient. However, there are several ways in which surgical face masks could potentially contribute to contamination of the surgical wound, e.g. by incorrect wear or by leaking air from the side of the mask due to poor string tension. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether disposable surgical face masks worn by the surgical team during clean surgery prevent postoperative surgical wound infection. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 14 September 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE (2008 to August Week 5 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process &Other Non-Indexed Citations September 13, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (2008 to 2011 Week 35); and EBSCO CINAHL (2008 to 9 September 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the use of disposable surgical masks with the use of no mask. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included, involving a total of 2113 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials. AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: From the limited results it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical face masks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10619946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106199462023-11-02 Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery Lipp, Allyson Edwards, Peggy Sao Paulo Med J Cochrane Highlights BACKGROUND: Surgical face masks were originally developed to contain and filter droplets containing microorganisms expelled from the mouth and nasopharynx of healthcare workers during surgery, thereby providing protection for the patient. However, there are several ways in which surgical face masks could potentially contribute to contamination of the surgical wound, e.g. by incorrect wear or by leaking air from the side of the mask due to poor string tension. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether disposable surgical face masks worn by the surgical team during clean surgery prevent postoperative surgical wound infection. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 14 September 2011); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE (2008 to August Week 5 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process &Other Non-Indexed Citations September 13, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (2008 to 2011 Week 35); and EBSCO CINAHL (2008 to 9 September 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the use of disposable surgical masks with the use of no mask. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included, involving a total of 2113 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials. AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: From the limited results it is unclear whether the wearing of surgical face masks by members of the surgical team has any impact on surgical wound infection rates for patients undergoing clean surgery. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2012-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10619946/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802012000400014 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.
spellingShingle Cochrane Highlights
Lipp, Allyson
Edwards, Peggy
Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title_full Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title_fullStr Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title_full_unstemmed Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title_short Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
title_sort disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
topic Cochrane Highlights
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619946/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802012000400014
work_keys_str_mv AT lippallyson disposablesurgicalfacemasksforpreventingsurgicalwoundinfectionincleansurgery
AT edwardspeggy disposablesurgicalfacemasksforpreventingsurgicalwoundinfectionincleansurgery