Cargando…

Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks

Deep neural network models of sensory systems are often proposed to learn representational transformations with invariances like those in the brain. To reveal these invariances, we generated ‘model metamers’, stimuli whose activations within a model stage are matched to those of a natural stimulus....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feather, Jenelle, Leclerc, Guillaume, Mądry, Aleksander, McDermott, Josh H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01442-0
_version_ 1785130133599813632
author Feather, Jenelle
Leclerc, Guillaume
Mądry, Aleksander
McDermott, Josh H.
author_facet Feather, Jenelle
Leclerc, Guillaume
Mądry, Aleksander
McDermott, Josh H.
author_sort Feather, Jenelle
collection PubMed
description Deep neural network models of sensory systems are often proposed to learn representational transformations with invariances like those in the brain. To reveal these invariances, we generated ‘model metamers’, stimuli whose activations within a model stage are matched to those of a natural stimulus. Metamers for state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised neural network models of vision and audition were often completely unrecognizable to humans when generated from late model stages, suggesting differences between model and human invariances. Targeted model changes improved human recognizability of model metamers but did not eliminate the overall human–model discrepancy. The human recognizability of a model’s metamers was well predicted by their recognizability by other models, suggesting that models contain idiosyncratic invariances in addition to those required by the task. Metamer recognizability dissociated from both traditional brain-based benchmarks and adversarial vulnerability, revealing a distinct failure mode of existing sensory models and providing a complementary benchmark for model assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10620097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106200972023-11-03 Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks Feather, Jenelle Leclerc, Guillaume Mądry, Aleksander McDermott, Josh H. Nat Neurosci Article Deep neural network models of sensory systems are often proposed to learn representational transformations with invariances like those in the brain. To reveal these invariances, we generated ‘model metamers’, stimuli whose activations within a model stage are matched to those of a natural stimulus. Metamers for state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised neural network models of vision and audition were often completely unrecognizable to humans when generated from late model stages, suggesting differences between model and human invariances. Targeted model changes improved human recognizability of model metamers but did not eliminate the overall human–model discrepancy. The human recognizability of a model’s metamers was well predicted by their recognizability by other models, suggesting that models contain idiosyncratic invariances in addition to those required by the task. Metamer recognizability dissociated from both traditional brain-based benchmarks and adversarial vulnerability, revealing a distinct failure mode of existing sensory models and providing a complementary benchmark for model assessment. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-10-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10620097/ /pubmed/37845543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01442-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Feather, Jenelle
Leclerc, Guillaume
Mądry, Aleksander
McDermott, Josh H.
Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title_full Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title_fullStr Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title_short Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
title_sort model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01442-0
work_keys_str_mv AT featherjenelle modelmetamersrevealdivergentinvariancesbetweenbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT leclercguillaume modelmetamersrevealdivergentinvariancesbetweenbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT madryaleksander modelmetamersrevealdivergentinvariancesbetweenbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT mcdermottjoshh modelmetamersrevealdivergentinvariancesbetweenbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks