Cargando…
Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogenous multifactorial neurodevelopmental condition with a significant genetic susceptibility component. Thus, identifying genetic variations associated with ASD is a complex task. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is an effective approach for detecting extremely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37914828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46258-x |
_version_ | 1785130157981302784 |
---|---|
author | Shil, Apurba Levin, Liron Golan, Hava Meiri, Gal Michaelovski, Analya Sadaka, Yair Aran, Adi Dinstein, Ilan Menashe, Idan |
author_facet | Shil, Apurba Levin, Liron Golan, Hava Meiri, Gal Michaelovski, Analya Sadaka, Yair Aran, Adi Dinstein, Ilan Menashe, Idan |
author_sort | Shil, Apurba |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogenous multifactorial neurodevelopmental condition with a significant genetic susceptibility component. Thus, identifying genetic variations associated with ASD is a complex task. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is an effective approach for detecting extremely rare protein-coding single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions/deletions (INDELs). However, interpreting these variants' functional and clinical consequences requires integrating multifaceted genomic information. We compared the concordance and effectiveness of three bioinformatics tools in detecting ASD candidate variants (SNVs and short INDELs) from WES data of 220 ASD family trios registered in the National Autism Database of Israel. We studied only rare (< 1% population frequency) proband-specific variants. According to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines, the pathogenicity of variants was evaluated by the InterVar and TAPES tools. In addition, likely gene-disrupting (LGD) variants were detected based on an in-house bioinformatics tool, Psi-Variant, that integrates results from seven in-silico prediction tools. Overall, 372 variants in 311 genes distributed in 168 probands were detected by these tools. The overlap between the tools was 64.1, 22.9, and 23.1% for InterVar–TAPES, InterVar–Psi-Variant, and TAPES–Psi-Variant, respectively. The intersection between InterVar and Psi-Variant (I ∩ P) was the most effective approach in detecting variants in known ASD genes (PPV = 0.274; OR = 7.09, 95% CI = 3.92–12.22), while the union of InterVar and Psi Variant (I U P) achieved the highest diagnostic yield (20.5%).Our results suggest that integrating different variant interpretation approaches in detecting ASD candidate variants from WES data is superior to each approach alone. The inclusion of additional criteria could further improve the detection of ASD candidate variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10620213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106202132023-11-03 Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data Shil, Apurba Levin, Liron Golan, Hava Meiri, Gal Michaelovski, Analya Sadaka, Yair Aran, Adi Dinstein, Ilan Menashe, Idan Sci Rep Article Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogenous multifactorial neurodevelopmental condition with a significant genetic susceptibility component. Thus, identifying genetic variations associated with ASD is a complex task. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is an effective approach for detecting extremely rare protein-coding single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions/deletions (INDELs). However, interpreting these variants' functional and clinical consequences requires integrating multifaceted genomic information. We compared the concordance and effectiveness of three bioinformatics tools in detecting ASD candidate variants (SNVs and short INDELs) from WES data of 220 ASD family trios registered in the National Autism Database of Israel. We studied only rare (< 1% population frequency) proband-specific variants. According to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines, the pathogenicity of variants was evaluated by the InterVar and TAPES tools. In addition, likely gene-disrupting (LGD) variants were detected based on an in-house bioinformatics tool, Psi-Variant, that integrates results from seven in-silico prediction tools. Overall, 372 variants in 311 genes distributed in 168 probands were detected by these tools. The overlap between the tools was 64.1, 22.9, and 23.1% for InterVar–TAPES, InterVar–Psi-Variant, and TAPES–Psi-Variant, respectively. The intersection between InterVar and Psi-Variant (I ∩ P) was the most effective approach in detecting variants in known ASD genes (PPV = 0.274; OR = 7.09, 95% CI = 3.92–12.22), while the union of InterVar and Psi Variant (I U P) achieved the highest diagnostic yield (20.5%).Our results suggest that integrating different variant interpretation approaches in detecting ASD candidate variants from WES data is superior to each approach alone. The inclusion of additional criteria could further improve the detection of ASD candidate variants. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10620213/ /pubmed/37914828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46258-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Shil, Apurba Levin, Liron Golan, Hava Meiri, Gal Michaelovski, Analya Sadaka, Yair Aran, Adi Dinstein, Ilan Menashe, Idan Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title | Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title_full | Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title_short | Comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
title_sort | comparison of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of asd candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37914828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46258-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shilapurba comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT levinliron comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT golanhava comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT meirigal comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT michaelovskianalya comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT sadakayair comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT aranadi comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT dinsteinilan comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata AT menasheidan comparisonofthreebioinformaticstoolsinthedetectionofasdcandidatevariantsfromwholeexomesequencingdata |