Cargando…
A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease?
INTRODUCTION: The following study aimed to answer the question if HPV-HNCUP and HPV-OPSCC are the same disease. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the oncological outcomes of both groups, in particular the 5-year overall survival rate (OS), the 5-year disease specific survival rate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08115-5 |
_version_ | 1785130165208088576 |
---|---|
author | Balk, Matthias Rupp, Robin Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Allner, Moritz Grundtner, Philipp Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Iro, Heinrich Hecht, Markus Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_facet | Balk, Matthias Rupp, Robin Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Allner, Moritz Grundtner, Philipp Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Iro, Heinrich Hecht, Markus Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_sort | Balk, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The following study aimed to answer the question if HPV-HNCUP and HPV-OPSCC are the same disease. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the oncological outcomes of both groups, in particular the 5-year overall survival rate (OS), the 5-year disease specific survival rate (DSS) and the 5-year progression free survival rate (PFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Firstly, between January 1st, 2007, and March 31st, 2020 a total of 131 patients were treated with HNCUP at our Department. Out of these, 21 patients with a confirmed positive p16 status were referred to surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Secondly, between January 1st, 2000, and January 31st, 2017, a total of 1596 patients were treated with an OPSSC at our Department. Out of these, 126 patients with a confirmed positive p16 status were referred to surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. After PSM, 84 patients with HPV-OPSCC and 21 HPV-HNCUP remained in the study for further comparison. RESULTS: The OS was 63.5% (95% CI 39.4–87.6) for HPV-HNCUP and 88.9% (95% CI 90.4–100.0) for HPV-OPSCC patients and therefore, significantly lower for the first mentioned (p = 0.013). The DSS was also significantly impaired for HPV-HNCUP (71.0%, 95% CI 46.3–95.7), in comparison with HPV-OPSCC patients (95.5%, 95% CI 90.4–100.0; p = 0.002). The PFS for HPV-HNCUP patients was lower (75.6%, 95% CI 54.0–97.2) yet not significantly different to HPV-OPSCC (90.4%, 95% CI 83.5–97.3; p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: The results presented demonstrate a significant reduced OS and DSS for HPV-HNCUP patients. Accordingly, in our study HPV-HNCUP and HPV-OPSCC are two different entities with a different oncological outcome. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-08115-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10620243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106202432023-11-03 A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? Balk, Matthias Rupp, Robin Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Allner, Moritz Grundtner, Philipp Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Iro, Heinrich Hecht, Markus Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck INTRODUCTION: The following study aimed to answer the question if HPV-HNCUP and HPV-OPSCC are the same disease. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the oncological outcomes of both groups, in particular the 5-year overall survival rate (OS), the 5-year disease specific survival rate (DSS) and the 5-year progression free survival rate (PFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Firstly, between January 1st, 2007, and March 31st, 2020 a total of 131 patients were treated with HNCUP at our Department. Out of these, 21 patients with a confirmed positive p16 status were referred to surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Secondly, between January 1st, 2000, and January 31st, 2017, a total of 1596 patients were treated with an OPSSC at our Department. Out of these, 126 patients with a confirmed positive p16 status were referred to surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. After PSM, 84 patients with HPV-OPSCC and 21 HPV-HNCUP remained in the study for further comparison. RESULTS: The OS was 63.5% (95% CI 39.4–87.6) for HPV-HNCUP and 88.9% (95% CI 90.4–100.0) for HPV-OPSCC patients and therefore, significantly lower for the first mentioned (p = 0.013). The DSS was also significantly impaired for HPV-HNCUP (71.0%, 95% CI 46.3–95.7), in comparison with HPV-OPSCC patients (95.5%, 95% CI 90.4–100.0; p = 0.002). The PFS for HPV-HNCUP patients was lower (75.6%, 95% CI 54.0–97.2) yet not significantly different to HPV-OPSCC (90.4%, 95% CI 83.5–97.3; p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: The results presented demonstrate a significant reduced OS and DSS for HPV-HNCUP patients. Accordingly, in our study HPV-HNCUP and HPV-OPSCC are two different entities with a different oncological outcome. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-08115-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10620243/ /pubmed/37505261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08115-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Balk, Matthias Rupp, Robin Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Allner, Moritz Grundtner, Philipp Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Iro, Heinrich Hecht, Markus Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title | A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title_full | A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title_fullStr | A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title_short | A comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HPV-HNCUP) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC): are they the same disease? |
title_sort | comparison between p16-positive head and neck cancer of unknown primary (hpv-hncup) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hpv-opscc): are they the same disease? |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08115-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balkmatthias acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT rupprobin acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT sievertmatti acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT mantsopouloskonstantinos acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT allnermoritz acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT grundtnerphilipp acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT muellersarinak acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT ecksteinmarkus acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT iroheinrich acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT hechtmarkus acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT gostianantoniuoreste acomparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT balkmatthias comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT rupprobin comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT sievertmatti comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT mantsopouloskonstantinos comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT allnermoritz comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT grundtnerphilipp comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT muellersarinak comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT ecksteinmarkus comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT iroheinrich comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT hechtmarkus comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease AT gostianantoniuoreste comparisonbetweenp16positiveheadandneckcancerofunknownprimaryhpvhncupandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomahpvopsccaretheythesamedisease |