Cargando…

Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system

OBJECTIVES: Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital systems dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frazee, Bradley W., Singh, Amarinder, Labreche, Matt, Imani, Partow, Ha, Kevin, Furszyfer Del Rio, Jonathan, Kreys, Eugene, Mccabe, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37927447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061
_version_ 1785130192121888768
author Frazee, Bradley W.
Singh, Amarinder
Labreche, Matt
Imani, Partow
Ha, Kevin
Furszyfer Del Rio, Jonathan
Kreys, Eugene
Mccabe, Robert
author_facet Frazee, Bradley W.
Singh, Amarinder
Labreche, Matt
Imani, Partow
Ha, Kevin
Furszyfer Del Rio, Jonathan
Kreys, Eugene
Mccabe, Robert
author_sort Frazee, Bradley W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital systems determine their own local prevalence and predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients satisfying this new broader CAP definition. We sought to carry out these recommendations in our system, focusing on the emergency department, where CAP diagnosis and initial empiric antibiotic selection usually ooccur. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with CAP through any of 3 EDs in our hospital system in Northern California between November 2019 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria included an ED admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis, fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and consistent chest imaging result. SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive cases were excluded. We abstracted variables historically associated with P. aeruginosa and MRSA. Outcome measures were prevalence of P. aeruginosa and MRSA in the overall clinically defined cohort and among microbiologically confirmed cases and predictors of P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation, as determined by univariate logistic regression, bootstrapped least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest analyses. Additionally, we describe the iterative process used and challenges encountered in carrying out the new ATS/IDSA guideline recommendations. RESULTS: There were 1133 unique patients who satisfied our definition of clinically defined CAP, of whom 109 (9.6%) had a bacterial pathogen isolated. There were 24 P. aeruginosa isolates and 11 MRSA isolates in 33 patients. Thus, the prevalence P. aeruginosa and MRSA was 2.9% in the overall CAP cohort, but 30.3% in the microbiologically confirmed cohort. The most important predictors of either P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation were tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] 22.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.39–46.96) and gastrostomy tube (OR 14.7; 95% CI 7.14–30.26). Challenges included determining the suspected infection type in patients admitted simply for “sepsis”; interpreting dictated radiology reports; determining functional status, presence of indwelling lines and tubes, and long‐term care facility residence from the electronic health record; and correctly attributing culture results to pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of MRSA and P. aeruginosa was low among patients admitted in our medical system with CAP – now broadly defined – but high among those with a microbiologically confirmed bacterial etiology. Our locally derived predictors of MRSA and P. aeruginosa can be used to aid our emergency physicians in empiric antibiotic selection for CAP. Findings from this project might inform efforts at other institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10620376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106203762023-11-03 Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system Frazee, Bradley W. Singh, Amarinder Labreche, Matt Imani, Partow Ha, Kevin Furszyfer Del Rio, Jonathan Kreys, Eugene Mccabe, Robert J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Infectious Disease OBJECTIVES: Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital systems determine their own local prevalence and predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients satisfying this new broader CAP definition. We sought to carry out these recommendations in our system, focusing on the emergency department, where CAP diagnosis and initial empiric antibiotic selection usually ooccur. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with CAP through any of 3 EDs in our hospital system in Northern California between November 2019 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria included an ED admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis, fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and consistent chest imaging result. SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive cases were excluded. We abstracted variables historically associated with P. aeruginosa and MRSA. Outcome measures were prevalence of P. aeruginosa and MRSA in the overall clinically defined cohort and among microbiologically confirmed cases and predictors of P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation, as determined by univariate logistic regression, bootstrapped least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest analyses. Additionally, we describe the iterative process used and challenges encountered in carrying out the new ATS/IDSA guideline recommendations. RESULTS: There were 1133 unique patients who satisfied our definition of clinically defined CAP, of whom 109 (9.6%) had a bacterial pathogen isolated. There were 24 P. aeruginosa isolates and 11 MRSA isolates in 33 patients. Thus, the prevalence P. aeruginosa and MRSA was 2.9% in the overall CAP cohort, but 30.3% in the microbiologically confirmed cohort. The most important predictors of either P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation were tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] 22.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.39–46.96) and gastrostomy tube (OR 14.7; 95% CI 7.14–30.26). Challenges included determining the suspected infection type in patients admitted simply for “sepsis”; interpreting dictated radiology reports; determining functional status, presence of indwelling lines and tubes, and long‐term care facility residence from the electronic health record; and correctly attributing culture results to pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of MRSA and P. aeruginosa was low among patients admitted in our medical system with CAP – now broadly defined – but high among those with a microbiologically confirmed bacterial etiology. Our locally derived predictors of MRSA and P. aeruginosa can be used to aid our emergency physicians in empiric antibiotic selection for CAP. Findings from this project might inform efforts at other institutions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10620376/ /pubmed/37927447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Frazee, Bradley W.
Singh, Amarinder
Labreche, Matt
Imani, Partow
Ha, Kevin
Furszyfer Del Rio, Jonathan
Kreys, Eugene
Mccabe, Robert
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_full Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_fullStr Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_full_unstemmed Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_short Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_sort methicillin‐resistant staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37927447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061
work_keys_str_mv AT frazeebradleyw methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT singhamarinder methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT labrechematt methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT imanipartow methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT hakevin methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT furszyferdelriojonathan methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT kreyseugene methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT mccaberobert methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem