Cargando…

Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”

OBJECTIVES: Mental illness affects one in eight people in the world according to the WHO. It is a leading cause of morbidity and a major public health problem. Stigma harms the quality of life of people with mental illness. This study aimed at validating the Arabic version of the Mental Health Knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben Amor, Maryem, Zgueb, Yosra, Bouguira, Emna, Metsahel, Amani, Aissa, Amina, Thonicroft, Graham, Ouali, Uta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241611
_version_ 1785130219084972032
author Ben Amor, Maryem
Zgueb, Yosra
Bouguira, Emna
Metsahel, Amani
Aissa, Amina
Thonicroft, Graham
Ouali, Uta
author_facet Ben Amor, Maryem
Zgueb, Yosra
Bouguira, Emna
Metsahel, Amani
Aissa, Amina
Thonicroft, Graham
Ouali, Uta
author_sort Ben Amor, Maryem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Mental illness affects one in eight people in the world according to the WHO. It is a leading cause of morbidity and a major public health problem. Stigma harms the quality of life of people with mental illness. This study aimed at validating the Arabic version of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS) in a sample of Tunisian students and determining socio-demographic and clinical factors correlated with stigma. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,501 Tunisian students who filled in the MAKS, the RIBS, and a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaires in Arabic was carried out using the validity criteria: face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity. Next, the associations between stigma and sample characteristics have been studied using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Face and content validity of the measures MAKS and RIBS were satisfactory, with adequate internal consistency. There were significant positive correlations between the items and scales, and test–retest reliability was excellent. The internal validity showed that the items were well-aligned with the intended factors, and the external validity revealed a significant positive relationship between the MAKS and RIBS. Besides, gender, the field of study, psychiatric history, and contact with someone with a mental illness were all contributing factors to mental illness stigma. Additionally, men performed better than women in terms of behavior toward people with mental illness, while women had a greater level of knowledge about mental health. CONCLUSION: The Arabic versions of the MAKS and RIBS have appropriate psychometric properties, making them effective tools for evaluating mental illness stigma. With multiple factors contributing to this issue, these instruments can help focus anti-stigma efforts and promote a more inclusive society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10620497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106204972023-11-03 Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale” Ben Amor, Maryem Zgueb, Yosra Bouguira, Emna Metsahel, Amani Aissa, Amina Thonicroft, Graham Ouali, Uta Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVES: Mental illness affects one in eight people in the world according to the WHO. It is a leading cause of morbidity and a major public health problem. Stigma harms the quality of life of people with mental illness. This study aimed at validating the Arabic version of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS) and the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS) in a sample of Tunisian students and determining socio-demographic and clinical factors correlated with stigma. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,501 Tunisian students who filled in the MAKS, the RIBS, and a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaires in Arabic was carried out using the validity criteria: face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity. Next, the associations between stigma and sample characteristics have been studied using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Face and content validity of the measures MAKS and RIBS were satisfactory, with adequate internal consistency. There were significant positive correlations between the items and scales, and test–retest reliability was excellent. The internal validity showed that the items were well-aligned with the intended factors, and the external validity revealed a significant positive relationship between the MAKS and RIBS. Besides, gender, the field of study, psychiatric history, and contact with someone with a mental illness were all contributing factors to mental illness stigma. Additionally, men performed better than women in terms of behavior toward people with mental illness, while women had a greater level of knowledge about mental health. CONCLUSION: The Arabic versions of the MAKS and RIBS have appropriate psychometric properties, making them effective tools for evaluating mental illness stigma. With multiple factors contributing to this issue, these instruments can help focus anti-stigma efforts and promote a more inclusive society. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10620497/ /pubmed/37928921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241611 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ben Amor, Zgueb, Bouguira, Metsahel, Aissa, Thonicroft and Ouali. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Ben Amor, Maryem
Zgueb, Yosra
Bouguira, Emna
Metsahel, Amani
Aissa, Amina
Thonicroft, Graham
Ouali, Uta
Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title_full Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title_fullStr Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title_full_unstemmed Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title_short Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
title_sort arabic validation of the “mental health knowledge schedule” and the “reported and intended behavior scale”
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241611
work_keys_str_mv AT benamormaryem arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT zguebyosra arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT bouguiraemna arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT metsahelamani arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT aissaamina arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT thonicroftgraham arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale
AT oualiuta arabicvalidationofthementalhealthknowledgescheduleandthereportedandintendedbehaviorscale