Cargando…

Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Management of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva Lopes, André Manuel, Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara, Darnac, Célia, Giacomini, Stellio, Bugeia, Sébastien, Gutknecht, Garance, Spurrier-Bernard, Gilliosa, Cuendet, Michel, Muet, Fanny, Aedo-Lopez, Veronica, Mederos, Nuria, Michielin, Olivier, Addeo, Alfredo, Latifyan, Sofiya, Eicher, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37851498
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48386
_version_ 1785130247902986240
author da Silva Lopes, André Manuel
Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara
Darnac, Célia
Giacomini, Stellio
Bugeia, Sébastien
Gutknecht, Garance
Spurrier-Bernard, Gilliosa
Cuendet, Michel
Muet, Fanny
Aedo-Lopez, Veronica
Mederos, Nuria
Michielin, Olivier
Addeo, Alfredo
Latifyan, Sofiya
Eicher, Manuela
author_facet da Silva Lopes, André Manuel
Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara
Darnac, Célia
Giacomini, Stellio
Bugeia, Sébastien
Gutknecht, Garance
Spurrier-Bernard, Gilliosa
Cuendet, Michel
Muet, Fanny
Aedo-Lopez, Veronica
Mederos, Nuria
Michielin, Olivier
Addeo, Alfredo
Latifyan, Sofiya
Eicher, Manuela
author_sort da Silva Lopes, André Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may result in shorter delays between symptom onset and clinician detection. OBJECTIVE: We assess the effect of a model of care for remote patient monitoring and symptom management based on PRO data on the time to detection of symptomatic IrAEs from symptom onset. The secondary objectives are to assess its effects on the time between symptomatic IrAE detection and intervention, IrAE grade (severity), health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and overall survival at 6 months. METHODS: For this study, 198 patients with cancer receiving systemic treatment comprising ICIs exclusively will be recruited from 2 Swiss university hospitals. Patients are randomized (1:1) to a digital model of care (intervention) or usual care (control group). Patients are enrolled for 6 months, and they use an electronic app to complete weekly Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire and PROMIS (PROs Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms questionnaires. The intervention patient group completes a standard set of 37 items in a weekly PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, and active symptoms are reassessed daily for the first 3 months by using a modified 24-hour recall period. Patients can add items from the full PRO-CTCAE item library to their questionnaire. Nurses call patients in the event of new or worsening symptoms and manage them by using a standardized triage algorithm based on the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society 24-hour triage tool. This algorithm provides guidance on deciding if patients should receive in-person care, if monitoring should be increased, or if self-management education should be reinforced. RESULTS: The Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer Foundation and Kaiku Health Ltd funded this study. Active recruitment began since November 2021 and is projected to conclude in November 2023. Trial results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2024 and will be disseminated through publications submitted at international scientific conferences. CONCLUSIONS: This trial is among the first trials to use PRO data to directly influence routine care of patients treated with ICIs and addresses some limitations in previous studies. This trial collects a wider spectrum of self-reported symptom data daily. There are some methodological limitations brought by changes in evolving treatment standards for patients with cancer. This trial's results could entail further academic discussions on the challenges of diagnosing and managing symptoms associated with treatment remotely by providing further insights into the burden symptoms represent to patients and highlight the complexity of care procedures involved in managing symptomatic IrAEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530187; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05530187 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48386
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10620631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106206312023-11-03 Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial da Silva Lopes, André Manuel Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara Darnac, Célia Giacomini, Stellio Bugeia, Sébastien Gutknecht, Garance Spurrier-Bernard, Gilliosa Cuendet, Michel Muet, Fanny Aedo-Lopez, Veronica Mederos, Nuria Michielin, Olivier Addeo, Alfredo Latifyan, Sofiya Eicher, Manuela JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Management of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may result in shorter delays between symptom onset and clinician detection. OBJECTIVE: We assess the effect of a model of care for remote patient monitoring and symptom management based on PRO data on the time to detection of symptomatic IrAEs from symptom onset. The secondary objectives are to assess its effects on the time between symptomatic IrAE detection and intervention, IrAE grade (severity), health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and overall survival at 6 months. METHODS: For this study, 198 patients with cancer receiving systemic treatment comprising ICIs exclusively will be recruited from 2 Swiss university hospitals. Patients are randomized (1:1) to a digital model of care (intervention) or usual care (control group). Patients are enrolled for 6 months, and they use an electronic app to complete weekly Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire and PROMIS (PROs Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms questionnaires. The intervention patient group completes a standard set of 37 items in a weekly PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, and active symptoms are reassessed daily for the first 3 months by using a modified 24-hour recall period. Patients can add items from the full PRO-CTCAE item library to their questionnaire. Nurses call patients in the event of new or worsening symptoms and manage them by using a standardized triage algorithm based on the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society 24-hour triage tool. This algorithm provides guidance on deciding if patients should receive in-person care, if monitoring should be increased, or if self-management education should be reinforced. RESULTS: The Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer Foundation and Kaiku Health Ltd funded this study. Active recruitment began since November 2021 and is projected to conclude in November 2023. Trial results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2024 and will be disseminated through publications submitted at international scientific conferences. CONCLUSIONS: This trial is among the first trials to use PRO data to directly influence routine care of patients treated with ICIs and addresses some limitations in previous studies. This trial collects a wider spectrum of self-reported symptom data daily. There are some methodological limitations brought by changes in evolving treatment standards for patients with cancer. This trial's results could entail further academic discussions on the challenges of diagnosing and managing symptoms associated with treatment remotely by providing further insights into the burden symptoms represent to patients and highlight the complexity of care procedures involved in managing symptomatic IrAEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530187; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05530187 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48386 JMIR Publications 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10620631/ /pubmed/37851498 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48386 Text en ©André Manuel da Silva Lopes, Sara Colomer-Lahiguera, Célia Darnac, Stellio Giacomini, Sébastien Bugeia, Garance Gutknecht, Gilliosa Spurrier-Bernard, Michel Cuendet, Fanny Muet, Veronica Aedo-Lopez, Nuria Mederos, Olivier Michielin, Alfredo Addeo, Sofiya Latifyan, Manuela Eicher. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 18.10.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
da Silva Lopes, André Manuel
Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara
Darnac, Célia
Giacomini, Stellio
Bugeia, Sébastien
Gutknecht, Garance
Spurrier-Bernard, Gilliosa
Cuendet, Michel
Muet, Fanny
Aedo-Lopez, Veronica
Mederos, Nuria
Michielin, Olivier
Addeo, Alfredo
Latifyan, Sofiya
Eicher, Manuela
Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title_full Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title_short Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial
title_sort testing a model of care for patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors based on electronic patient-reported outcomes: protocol for a randomized phase ii controlled trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37851498
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48386
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvalopesandremanuel testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT colomerlahiguerasara testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT darnaccelia testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT giacoministellio testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT bugeiasebastien testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT gutknechtgarance testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT spurrierbernardgilliosa testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT cuendetmichel testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT muetfanny testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT aedolopezveronica testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT mederosnuria testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT michielinolivier testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT addeoalfredo testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT latifyansofiya testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial
AT eichermanuela testingamodelofcareforpatientsonimmunecheckpointinhibitorsbasedonelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesprotocolforarandomizedphaseiicontrolledtrial