Cargando…

Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?

INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shapiro, Leland, Scherger, Sias, Franco-Paredes, Carlos, Gharamti, Amal, Henao-Martinez, Andrés F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483
_version_ 1785130259059834880
author Shapiro, Leland
Scherger, Sias
Franco-Paredes, Carlos
Gharamti, Amal
Henao-Martinez, Andrés F.
author_facet Shapiro, Leland
Scherger, Sias
Franco-Paredes, Carlos
Gharamti, Amal
Henao-Martinez, Andrés F.
author_sort Shapiro, Leland
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. These decisions followed publication of the suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and early Management OF seveRE respiratory failure by COVID-19 (SAVE- MORE) phase 3 clinical trial that yielded positive results. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and theoretical analysis of IL-1 blockade as a therapy to treat COVID-19. Using a stepwise analysis, we assessed clinical applicability of the SAVE-MORE results and evaluated conceptual support for interleukin-1 suppression as a suitable approach to COVID-19 treatment. This therapeutic approach was then examined as an example of inflammation-suppressing measures used to treat sepsis. RESULTS: Anakinra use as a COVID-19 therapy seems to rely on a view of pathogenesis that incorrectly reflects human disease. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, COVID-19 benefit due to anti-inflammatory therapy contradicts an extensive history of unsuccessful clinical study. Repurposing rhIL-1ra to treat COVID-19 appears to exemplify a cycle followed by inflammation-suppressing sepsis treatments. A landscape of treatment failures is interrupted by a successful clinical trial. However, subsequent confirmatory study fails to replicate the positive data. DISCUSSION: We suggest further experimentation is not a promising pathway to discover game-changing sepsis therapies. A different kind of approach may be necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10620707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106207072023-11-03 Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? Shapiro, Leland Scherger, Sias Franco-Paredes, Carlos Gharamti, Amal Henao-Martinez, Andrés F. Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. These decisions followed publication of the suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and early Management OF seveRE respiratory failure by COVID-19 (SAVE- MORE) phase 3 clinical trial that yielded positive results. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and theoretical analysis of IL-1 blockade as a therapy to treat COVID-19. Using a stepwise analysis, we assessed clinical applicability of the SAVE-MORE results and evaluated conceptual support for interleukin-1 suppression as a suitable approach to COVID-19 treatment. This therapeutic approach was then examined as an example of inflammation-suppressing measures used to treat sepsis. RESULTS: Anakinra use as a COVID-19 therapy seems to rely on a view of pathogenesis that incorrectly reflects human disease. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, COVID-19 benefit due to anti-inflammatory therapy contradicts an extensive history of unsuccessful clinical study. Repurposing rhIL-1ra to treat COVID-19 appears to exemplify a cycle followed by inflammation-suppressing sepsis treatments. A landscape of treatment failures is interrupted by a successful clinical trial. However, subsequent confirmatory study fails to replicate the positive data. DISCUSSION: We suggest further experimentation is not a promising pathway to discover game-changing sepsis therapies. A different kind of approach may be necessary. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10620707/ /pubmed/37928695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shapiro, Scherger, Franco-Paredes, Gharamti and Henao-Martinez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Shapiro, Leland
Scherger, Sias
Franco-Paredes, Carlos
Gharamti, Amal
Henao-Martinez, Andrés F.
Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title_full Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title_fullStr Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title_full_unstemmed Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title_short Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
title_sort anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483
work_keys_str_mv AT shapiroleland anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect
AT schergersias anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect
AT francoparedescarlos anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect
AT gharamtiamal anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect
AT henaomartinezandresf anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect