Cargando…
Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?
INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483 |
_version_ | 1785130259059834880 |
---|---|
author | Shapiro, Leland Scherger, Sias Franco-Paredes, Carlos Gharamti, Amal Henao-Martinez, Andrés F. |
author_facet | Shapiro, Leland Scherger, Sias Franco-Paredes, Carlos Gharamti, Amal Henao-Martinez, Andrés F. |
author_sort | Shapiro, Leland |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. These decisions followed publication of the suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and early Management OF seveRE respiratory failure by COVID-19 (SAVE- MORE) phase 3 clinical trial that yielded positive results. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and theoretical analysis of IL-1 blockade as a therapy to treat COVID-19. Using a stepwise analysis, we assessed clinical applicability of the SAVE-MORE results and evaluated conceptual support for interleukin-1 suppression as a suitable approach to COVID-19 treatment. This therapeutic approach was then examined as an example of inflammation-suppressing measures used to treat sepsis. RESULTS: Anakinra use as a COVID-19 therapy seems to rely on a view of pathogenesis that incorrectly reflects human disease. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, COVID-19 benefit due to anti-inflammatory therapy contradicts an extensive history of unsuccessful clinical study. Repurposing rhIL-1ra to treat COVID-19 appears to exemplify a cycle followed by inflammation-suppressing sepsis treatments. A landscape of treatment failures is interrupted by a successful clinical trial. However, subsequent confirmatory study fails to replicate the positive data. DISCUSSION: We suggest further experimentation is not a promising pathway to discover game-changing sepsis therapies. A different kind of approach may be necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10620707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106207072023-11-03 Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? Shapiro, Leland Scherger, Sias Franco-Paredes, Carlos Gharamti, Amal Henao-Martinez, Andrés F. Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced conditions for using recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) to treat hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and risk for progression. These decisions followed publication of the suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and early Management OF seveRE respiratory failure by COVID-19 (SAVE- MORE) phase 3 clinical trial that yielded positive results. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and theoretical analysis of IL-1 blockade as a therapy to treat COVID-19. Using a stepwise analysis, we assessed clinical applicability of the SAVE-MORE results and evaluated conceptual support for interleukin-1 suppression as a suitable approach to COVID-19 treatment. This therapeutic approach was then examined as an example of inflammation-suppressing measures used to treat sepsis. RESULTS: Anakinra use as a COVID-19 therapy seems to rely on a view of pathogenesis that incorrectly reflects human disease. Since COVID-19 is an example of sepsis, COVID-19 benefit due to anti-inflammatory therapy contradicts an extensive history of unsuccessful clinical study. Repurposing rhIL-1ra to treat COVID-19 appears to exemplify a cycle followed by inflammation-suppressing sepsis treatments. A landscape of treatment failures is interrupted by a successful clinical trial. However, subsequent confirmatory study fails to replicate the positive data. DISCUSSION: We suggest further experimentation is not a promising pathway to discover game-changing sepsis therapies. A different kind of approach may be necessary. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10620707/ /pubmed/37928695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shapiro, Scherger, Franco-Paredes, Gharamti and Henao-Martinez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Shapiro, Leland Scherger, Sias Franco-Paredes, Carlos Gharamti, Amal Henao-Martinez, Andrés F. Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title | Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title_full | Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title_fullStr | Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title_full_unstemmed | Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title_short | Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
title_sort | anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect? |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shapiroleland anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect AT schergersias anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect AT francoparedescarlos anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect AT gharamtiamal anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect AT henaomartinezandresf anakinraauthorizedtotreatseverecoronavirusdisease2019sepsisbreakthroughortimetoreflect |