Selective Deoxygenation of Waste Cooking Oil to Diesel-Like Hydrocarbons Using Supported and Unsupported NiMoS(2) Catalysts

[Image: see text] This work aimed to study the deoxygenation of two different waste cooking oils (WCOs; palm oil and soybean oil) using alumina (γ-Al(2)O(3))-supported and unsupported NiMoS(2) catalysts prepared by the hydrothermal method. The variables evaluated in this study were the reactant concentration, reaction time, and nickel (Ni)/[Ni + molybdenum (Mo)] atomic ratio (0.2 and 0.3) affecting the yield and selectivity of alkane products. The supported NiMo sulfide (NiMoS(2))/γ-Al(2)O(3) catalyst prepared by impregnation had the drawback of a lack of layers and stacks, so combining the γ-Al(2)O(3) with unsupported NiMoS(2) catalysts using a hydrothermal method was evaluated. The main products obtained from the deoxygenation of the two WCOs were normal (n-)alkane compounds (C(15), C(16), C(17), and C(18)). The catalyst efficiency was ranked as 0.2-NiMoS(2)/γ-Al(2)O(3) ≈ 0.2-NiMoS(2) > 0.3-NiMoS(2)/γ-Al(2)O(3) ≈ 0.3-NiMoS(2). The catalyst that gave the high n-C(15)–C(18) yield was 0.2-NiMoS(2)/γ-Al(2)O(3) under a reaction condition of 300 °C, 40 bar initial H(2) pressure, and oil concentration of 5 wt %. For the hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of waste palm oil, the n-C(14)–C(18) yield was 56.4% (C(14), C(15), C(16), C(17), and C(18) at 1.3, 6.7, 14.5, 11.8, and 22.1%, respectively), while that for the waste soybean oil was 58% (C(14), C(15), C(16), C(17), and C(18) at 1.1, 3.8, 6.7, 17.2, and 29.2%, respectively). The n-C(18)/n-C(17) and n-C(16)/n-C(15) ratios were both greater than 1 for both types of WCO, revealing that the deoxygenation mainly proceeded via HDO rather than decarbonylation and decarboxylation. The 5–10% lower n-C(14)–C(18) yield from the waste oil compared with the fresh oil was acceptable, implying the effective oil treatment and some impurity removal.