Cargando…

Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities are a marginalized group whose health experiences and outcomes are poor. Lack of skill and knowledge in the healthcare workforce is a contributing factor. In England, there is a new legislative requirement for mandatory intellectual disability traini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Towson, Georgia, Daley, Stephanie, Banerjee, Sube
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04766-4
_version_ 1785130351988834304
author Towson, Georgia
Daley, Stephanie
Banerjee, Sube
author_facet Towson, Georgia
Daley, Stephanie
Banerjee, Sube
author_sort Towson, Georgia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities are a marginalized group whose health experiences and outcomes are poor. Lack of skill and knowledge in the healthcare workforce is a contributing factor. In England, there is a new legislative requirement for mandatory intellectual disability training to be given to the existing healthcare workforce, including doctors. There is a lack of evidence about effective models of educational delivery of such training in medical schools. We undertook a scoping review to assess the range of intellectual disabilities educational interventions and their effectiveness. METHODS: We included any study from 1980 onwards which reported an educational intervention on intellectual disability, or intellectual disability and autism, for medical students from any year group. Databases searched included PUBMED, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science as well as searches of grey literature and hand searching two journals (Medical Education and Journal of Learning Disabilities). 2,020 records were extracted, with 1,992 excluded from initial screening, and a further 12 excluded from full-text review, leaving 16 studies for inclusion. Data was extracted, quality assessed, and findings collated using narrative analysis. RESULTS: We found a variety of intervention types: classroom-based teaching, simulation, placement, home visits, and panel discussions. There was substantial variation in content. Most studies involved lived experience input. Across studies, interventions had different learning outcomes which made it difficult to assess effectiveness. Overall study quality was poor, with high use of non-validated measures, making further assessment of effectiveness problematic. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more consistency in intervention design, and higher quality evaluation of teaching in this area. Our review has drawn attention to the variety in teaching on this topic area and further research should focus on updating this review as curriculum changes are implemented over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106211422023-11-03 Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review Towson, Georgia Daley, Stephanie Banerjee, Sube BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities are a marginalized group whose health experiences and outcomes are poor. Lack of skill and knowledge in the healthcare workforce is a contributing factor. In England, there is a new legislative requirement for mandatory intellectual disability training to be given to the existing healthcare workforce, including doctors. There is a lack of evidence about effective models of educational delivery of such training in medical schools. We undertook a scoping review to assess the range of intellectual disabilities educational interventions and their effectiveness. METHODS: We included any study from 1980 onwards which reported an educational intervention on intellectual disability, or intellectual disability and autism, for medical students from any year group. Databases searched included PUBMED, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science as well as searches of grey literature and hand searching two journals (Medical Education and Journal of Learning Disabilities). 2,020 records were extracted, with 1,992 excluded from initial screening, and a further 12 excluded from full-text review, leaving 16 studies for inclusion. Data was extracted, quality assessed, and findings collated using narrative analysis. RESULTS: We found a variety of intervention types: classroom-based teaching, simulation, placement, home visits, and panel discussions. There was substantial variation in content. Most studies involved lived experience input. Across studies, interventions had different learning outcomes which made it difficult to assess effectiveness. Overall study quality was poor, with high use of non-validated measures, making further assessment of effectiveness problematic. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more consistency in intervention design, and higher quality evaluation of teaching in this area. Our review has drawn attention to the variety in teaching on this topic area and further research should focus on updating this review as curriculum changes are implemented over time. BioMed Central 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10621142/ /pubmed/37915002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04766-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Towson, Georgia
Daley, Stephanie
Banerjee, Sube
Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title_full Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title_fullStr Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title_short Intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
title_sort intellectual disabilities teaching for medical students: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04766-4
work_keys_str_mv AT towsongeorgia intellectualdisabilitiesteachingformedicalstudentsascopingreview
AT daleystephanie intellectualdisabilitiesteachingformedicalstudentsascopingreview
AT banerjeesube intellectualdisabilitiesteachingformedicalstudentsascopingreview