Cargando…

The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response

BACKGROUND: Major incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field’s in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Peter Martin, Mikkelsen, Søren, Alstrøm, Henrik, Damm-Hejmdal, Anders, Rehn, Marius, Berlac, Peter Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7
_version_ 1785130353453694976
author Hansen, Peter Martin
Mikkelsen, Søren
Alstrøm, Henrik
Damm-Hejmdal, Anders
Rehn, Marius
Berlac, Peter Anthony
author_facet Hansen, Peter Martin
Mikkelsen, Søren
Alstrøm, Henrik
Damm-Hejmdal, Anders
Rehn, Marius
Berlac, Peter Anthony
author_sort Hansen, Peter Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field’s in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people were killed and seven injured by a gunman, firing a rifle inside the mall. A further 21 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation of the mall. In this case report, we describe the emergency medical services (EMS) incident response and evaluate the EMS´ adherence to the MI management guidelines to identify possible areas of improvement. CASE PRESENTATION: Forty-eight EMS units including five Tactical Emergency Medical Service teams were dispatched to the incident. Four critically injured patients were taken to two trauma hospitals. The deceased patients were declared dead at the scene and remained there for the sake of the investigation. A total of 24 patients with less severe and minor injuries were treated at four different hospitals in connection with the attack. The ambulance resources were inherently limited in the initial phase of the MI, mandating improvisation in medical incident command. Though challenged, Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment, Triage, Treatment, Transport (CSCATTT) principles were followed. CONCLUSIONS: The EMS response generally adhered to national guidelines for MI. The activation of EMS and the hospital preparedness program was relevant. Important findings were communication shortcomings; inherent lack of readily available ambulance resources in the initial critical phase; uncertainty regarding the number of perpetrators; uncertainty regarding number of casualties and social media rumors that unnecessarily hampered and prolonged the response. The incident command had to use non-standard measures to mitigate potential challenges. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106211482023-11-03 The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response Hansen, Peter Martin Mikkelsen, Søren Alstrøm, Henrik Damm-Hejmdal, Anders Rehn, Marius Berlac, Peter Anthony Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Case Report BACKGROUND: Major incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field’s in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people were killed and seven injured by a gunman, firing a rifle inside the mall. A further 21 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation of the mall. In this case report, we describe the emergency medical services (EMS) incident response and evaluate the EMS´ adherence to the MI management guidelines to identify possible areas of improvement. CASE PRESENTATION: Forty-eight EMS units including five Tactical Emergency Medical Service teams were dispatched to the incident. Four critically injured patients were taken to two trauma hospitals. The deceased patients were declared dead at the scene and remained there for the sake of the investigation. A total of 24 patients with less severe and minor injuries were treated at four different hospitals in connection with the attack. The ambulance resources were inherently limited in the initial phase of the MI, mandating improvisation in medical incident command. Though challenged, Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment, Triage, Treatment, Transport (CSCATTT) principles were followed. CONCLUSIONS: The EMS response generally adhered to national guidelines for MI. The activation of EMS and the hospital preparedness program was relevant. Important findings were communication shortcomings; inherent lack of readily available ambulance resources in the initial critical phase; uncertainty regarding the number of perpetrators; uncertainty regarding number of casualties and social media rumors that unnecessarily hampered and prolonged the response. The incident command had to use non-standard measures to mitigate potential challenges. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7. BioMed Central 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10621148/ /pubmed/37919753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Hansen, Peter Martin
Mikkelsen, Søren
Alstrøm, Henrik
Damm-Hejmdal, Anders
Rehn, Marius
Berlac, Peter Anthony
The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title_full The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title_fullStr The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title_full_unstemmed The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title_short The Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
title_sort field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenpetermartin thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT mikkelsensøren thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT alstrømhenrik thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT dammhejmdalanders thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT rehnmarius thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT berlacpeteranthony thefieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT hansenpetermartin fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT mikkelsensøren fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT alstrømhenrik fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT dammhejmdalanders fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT rehnmarius fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse
AT berlacpeteranthony fieldsmassshootingemergencymedicalservicesresponse