Cargando…

Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA(®); OTX-101), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®);...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karpecki, Paul, Barghout, Victoria, Schenkel, Brad, Huynh, Lynn, Khanal, Anamika, Mitchell, Brittany, Yenikomshian, Mihran, Zanardo, Enrico, Matossian, Cynthia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y
_version_ 1785130372726521856
author Karpecki, Paul
Barghout, Victoria
Schenkel, Brad
Huynh, Lynn
Khanal, Anamika
Mitchell, Brittany
Yenikomshian, Mihran
Zanardo, Enrico
Matossian, Cynthia
author_facet Karpecki, Paul
Barghout, Victoria
Schenkel, Brad
Huynh, Lynn
Khanal, Anamika
Mitchell, Brittany
Yenikomshian, Mihran
Zanardo, Enrico
Matossian, Cynthia
author_sort Karpecki, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA(®); OTX-101), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); CsA), and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% (Xiidra(®); LFT) are anti-inflammatory agents indicated for DED. This analysis compared treatment patterns in patients with DED receiving OTX-101, CsA, or LFT. METHODS: This real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106212282023-11-03 Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis Karpecki, Paul Barghout, Victoria Schenkel, Brad Huynh, Lynn Khanal, Anamika Mitchell, Brittany Yenikomshian, Mihran Zanardo, Enrico Matossian, Cynthia BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA(®); OTX-101), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); CsA), and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% (Xiidra(®); LFT) are anti-inflammatory agents indicated for DED. This analysis compared treatment patterns in patients with DED receiving OTX-101, CsA, or LFT. METHODS: This real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y. BioMed Central 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10621228/ /pubmed/37919692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Karpecki, Paul
Barghout, Victoria
Schenkel, Brad
Huynh, Lynn
Khanal, Anamika
Mitchell, Brittany
Yenikomshian, Mihran
Zanardo, Enrico
Matossian, Cynthia
Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title_full Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title_short Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
title_sort real-world treatment patterns of otx-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y
work_keys_str_mv AT karpeckipaul realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT barghoutvictoria realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT schenkelbrad realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT huynhlynn realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT khanalanamika realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT mitchellbrittany realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT yenikomshianmihran realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT zanardoenrico realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis
AT matossiancynthia realworldtreatmentpatternsofotx101ophthalmicsolutioncyclosporineophthalmicemulsionandlifitegrastophthalmicsolutioninpatientswithdryeyediseasearetrospectiveanalysis