Cargando…

Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting

Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klitgaard, Allan, Løkke, Anders, Frølund, Jannie, Kristensen, Steffen, Hilberg, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026
_version_ 1785130376229814272
author Klitgaard, Allan
Løkke, Anders
Frølund, Jannie
Kristensen, Steffen
Hilberg, Ole
author_facet Klitgaard, Allan
Løkke, Anders
Frølund, Jannie
Kristensen, Steffen
Hilberg, Ole
author_sort Klitgaard, Allan
collection PubMed
description Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1–2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592–0.859), P = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106212432023-11-03 Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting Klitgaard, Allan Løkke, Anders Frølund, Jannie Kristensen, Steffen Hilberg, Ole Eur Clin Respir J Research Article Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1–2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592–0.859), P = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10621243/ /pubmed/37928453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klitgaard, Allan
Løkke, Anders
Frølund, Jannie
Kristensen, Steffen
Hilberg, Ole
Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title_full Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title_fullStr Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title_short Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
title_sort introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026
work_keys_str_mv AT klitgaardallan introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting
AT løkkeanders introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting
AT frølundjannie introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting
AT kristensensteffen introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting
AT hilbergole introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting