Cargando…
Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting
Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a system...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026 |
_version_ | 1785130376229814272 |
---|---|
author | Klitgaard, Allan Løkke, Anders Frølund, Jannie Kristensen, Steffen Hilberg, Ole |
author_facet | Klitgaard, Allan Løkke, Anders Frølund, Jannie Kristensen, Steffen Hilberg, Ole |
author_sort | Klitgaard, Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1–2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592–0.859), P = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10621243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106212432023-11-03 Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting Klitgaard, Allan Løkke, Anders Frølund, Jannie Kristensen, Steffen Hilberg, Ole Eur Clin Respir J Research Article Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1–2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592–0.859), P = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10621243/ /pubmed/37928453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Klitgaard, Allan Løkke, Anders Frølund, Jannie Kristensen, Steffen Hilberg, Ole Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title | Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title_full | Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title_fullStr | Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title_short | Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
title_sort | introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klitgaardallan introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting AT løkkeanders introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting AT frølundjannie introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting AT kristensensteffen introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting AT hilbergole introductionofasystematicexaminationframeworkforchroniccoughabeforeaftercohortstudyinaclinicalsetting |