Cargando…

Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method

PURPOSE: Stereopsis is the ability to perceive depth using the slightly different views from two eyes. This study aims to conduct innovative stereopsis tests using the objective data outputted by eye tracking technology. METHODS: A laptop and an eye tracker were used to establish the test system. An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lu, Yu, Bo, Xu, Lingxian, Wang, Shiyi, Zhao, Lingzhi, Wu, Huang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293735
_version_ 1785130435224797184
author Liu, Lu
Yu, Bo
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Shiyi
Zhao, Lingzhi
Wu, Huang
author_facet Liu, Lu
Yu, Bo
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Shiyi
Zhao, Lingzhi
Wu, Huang
author_sort Liu, Lu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stereopsis is the ability to perceive depth using the slightly different views from two eyes. This study aims to conduct innovative stereopsis tests using the objective data outputted by eye tracking technology. METHODS: A laptop and an eye tracker were used to establish the test system. Anaglyphic glasses were employed to execute the stereopsis assessment. The test symbol employed was devised to emulate the quantitative measurement component of the Random Dot 3 Stereo Acuity Test. Sub-pixel technology was used to increase the disparity accuracy of test pages. The tested disparities were: 160″, 100″, 63″, 50″, 40″, 32″, 25″, 20″, 16″, and 12.5″. The test was conducted at a distance of 0.65m. Conventional and eye tracking stereopsis assessments were conducted on 120 subjects. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the difference, while the Bland-Altman method was used to test the consistency between the two methods. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed no significant difference between conventional and eye tracking thresholds of stereopsis (Z = −1.497, P = 0.134). There was a high level of agreement between the two methods using Bland- Altman statistical analysis (The 95 per cent limits of agreement were −0.40 to 0.47 log arcsec). CONCLUSIONS: Stereoacuity can be evaluated utilizing an innovative stereopsis measurement system grounded in eye tracking technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106218232023-11-03 Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method Liu, Lu Yu, Bo Xu, Lingxian Wang, Shiyi Zhao, Lingzhi Wu, Huang PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Stereopsis is the ability to perceive depth using the slightly different views from two eyes. This study aims to conduct innovative stereopsis tests using the objective data outputted by eye tracking technology. METHODS: A laptop and an eye tracker were used to establish the test system. Anaglyphic glasses were employed to execute the stereopsis assessment. The test symbol employed was devised to emulate the quantitative measurement component of the Random Dot 3 Stereo Acuity Test. Sub-pixel technology was used to increase the disparity accuracy of test pages. The tested disparities were: 160″, 100″, 63″, 50″, 40″, 32″, 25″, 20″, 16″, and 12.5″. The test was conducted at a distance of 0.65m. Conventional and eye tracking stereopsis assessments were conducted on 120 subjects. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the difference, while the Bland-Altman method was used to test the consistency between the two methods. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed no significant difference between conventional and eye tracking thresholds of stereopsis (Z = −1.497, P = 0.134). There was a high level of agreement between the two methods using Bland- Altman statistical analysis (The 95 per cent limits of agreement were −0.40 to 0.47 log arcsec). CONCLUSIONS: Stereoacuity can be evaluated utilizing an innovative stereopsis measurement system grounded in eye tracking technology. Public Library of Science 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10621823/ /pubmed/37917615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293735 Text en © 2023 Liu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Lu
Yu, Bo
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Shiyi
Zhao, Lingzhi
Wu, Huang
Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title_full Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title_fullStr Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title_short Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
title_sort comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293735
work_keys_str_mv AT liulu comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod
AT yubo comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod
AT xulingxian comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod
AT wangshiyi comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod
AT zhaolingzhi comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod
AT wuhuang comparisonofstereopsisthresholdsmeasuredwithconventionalmethodsandaneweyetrackingmethod