Cargando…

Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: A content analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The keyword “digital indirect bonding” was first searched on YouTube, resulting in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cokakoglu, Serpil, Cakir, Ezgi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37929224
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231152882
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The keyword “digital indirect bonding” was first searched on YouTube, resulting in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, target audience, purpose, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments, were then evaluated. After this initial assessment, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated. Video content quality was determined using a 5-point scale that categorized videos as having poor, moderate, or good content quality. This rating was based on the presence and discussion of various topics related to digital indirect bonding, including digital scan, digital bracket placement, transfer tray production from a 3D-printed model or direct production as a 3D-printed tray, clinical application, and advantages and/or disadvantages. The videos were assessed for quality using the global quality scale (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the rating reliability. RESULTS: The majority of the videos were classified as having poor content quality (41.9%), followed by moderate (38.7%) and good (19.4%) content quality. No significant differences were found between the videos in terms of descriptive parameters. However, videos with good content quality had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores than moderate and poor content videos. The total content showed significant correlations with GQS and VIQI (r=0.780 and r=0.446, respectively; plt;0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, while the majority of YouTube videos regarding digital indirect bonding were of poor content quality, those that were of good content quality could be considered a useful source of professional information.