Cargando…

Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?

OBJECTIVES: The intramedullary nail is considered the gold standard for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. However, it still faces a significant rate of failure, mainly due to the critical factor of comminuted lateral wall defects leading to inadequate proximal sliding compressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Cong, Chen, Zhangxin, Wang, Mengyuan, Chen, Huiyu, Zhu, Lingqi, Yang, Wenqing, Ding, Zhenqi, Huang, Guofeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37767609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13875
_version_ 1785130497940127744
author Zhang, Cong
Chen, Zhangxin
Wang, Mengyuan
Chen, Huiyu
Zhu, Lingqi
Yang, Wenqing
Ding, Zhenqi
Huang, Guofeng
author_facet Zhang, Cong
Chen, Zhangxin
Wang, Mengyuan
Chen, Huiyu
Zhu, Lingqi
Yang, Wenqing
Ding, Zhenqi
Huang, Guofeng
author_sort Zhang, Cong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The intramedullary nail is considered the gold standard for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. However, it still faces a significant rate of failure, mainly due to the critical factor of comminuted lateral wall defects leading to inadequate proximal sliding compression. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the requirement of sliding compression in the treatment of unstable AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. To achieve this, we conduct a comparative analysis between two approaches: InterTAN alone and proximal femoral anti‐rotation blade nailing (PFNA) combined with lateral wall reconstruction for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall damage. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing fixation for AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures at our hospital from January 2012 to January 2022. Patient characteristics as well as treatment details, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, weight‐bearing time, fracture healing time, tip apex distance (TAD) loss, Harris hip scores (HHS), Parker–Palmer mobility score (PPMS), and postoperative complications, were collected and analyzed. Continuous variables were analyzed using independent sample t‐tests, while categorical variables were examined using the chi‐square test. For group comparisons, variance analysis was applied, and pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD‐t test. RESULTS: These patients were divided into PFNA combined with lateral wall reconstruction group (sliding compression group) and InterTAN fixation group (static fixation group) based on surgical methods. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding loss, HHS at 12 months and PPMS at 12 months in the sliding compression group were significantly higher than those in the static fixation group, and time to weight‐bearing and fracture healing time were significantly lower than those in the static fixation group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the TAD at 2 days, 2, and 12 months postoperatively, the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, femoral neck length was shortened compared to 2 days postoperatively in both groups, and the sliding compression group had a significantly greater degree of femoral neck shortening than the static fixation group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PFNA with lateral wall reconstruction for A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures demonstrated superior mobility, efficiency, and reduced internal fixation failure rates compared to InterTAN. These findings suggest that sliding compression may be required for intramedullary nailing treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10622258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106222582023-11-04 Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture? Zhang, Cong Chen, Zhangxin Wang, Mengyuan Chen, Huiyu Zhu, Lingqi Yang, Wenqing Ding, Zhenqi Huang, Guofeng Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVES: The intramedullary nail is considered the gold standard for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. However, it still faces a significant rate of failure, mainly due to the critical factor of comminuted lateral wall defects leading to inadequate proximal sliding compression. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the requirement of sliding compression in the treatment of unstable AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. To achieve this, we conduct a comparative analysis between two approaches: InterTAN alone and proximal femoral anti‐rotation blade nailing (PFNA) combined with lateral wall reconstruction for treating AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures with lateral wall damage. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing fixation for AO/OTA type A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures at our hospital from January 2012 to January 2022. Patient characteristics as well as treatment details, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, weight‐bearing time, fracture healing time, tip apex distance (TAD) loss, Harris hip scores (HHS), Parker–Palmer mobility score (PPMS), and postoperative complications, were collected and analyzed. Continuous variables were analyzed using independent sample t‐tests, while categorical variables were examined using the chi‐square test. For group comparisons, variance analysis was applied, and pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD‐t test. RESULTS: These patients were divided into PFNA combined with lateral wall reconstruction group (sliding compression group) and InterTAN fixation group (static fixation group) based on surgical methods. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding loss, HHS at 12 months and PPMS at 12 months in the sliding compression group were significantly higher than those in the static fixation group, and time to weight‐bearing and fracture healing time were significantly lower than those in the static fixation group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of the TAD at 2 days, 2, and 12 months postoperatively, the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, femoral neck length was shortened compared to 2 days postoperatively in both groups, and the sliding compression group had a significantly greater degree of femoral neck shortening than the static fixation group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PFNA with lateral wall reconstruction for A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures demonstrated superior mobility, efficiency, and reduced internal fixation failure rates compared to InterTAN. These findings suggest that sliding compression may be required for intramedullary nailing treatment. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10622258/ /pubmed/37767609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13875 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Zhang, Cong
Chen, Zhangxin
Wang, Mengyuan
Chen, Huiyu
Zhu, Lingqi
Yang, Wenqing
Ding, Zhenqi
Huang, Guofeng
Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title_full Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title_fullStr Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title_full_unstemmed Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title_short Is Sliding Compression Necessary for Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of AO/OTA Type A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fracture?
title_sort is sliding compression necessary for intramedullary nailing fixation of ao/ota type a3.3 intertrochanteric fracture?
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37767609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13875
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangcong isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT chenzhangxin isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT wangmengyuan isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT chenhuiyu isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT zhulingqi isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT yangwenqing isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT dingzhenqi isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture
AT huangguofeng isslidingcompressionnecessaryforintramedullarynailingfixationofaootatypea33intertrochantericfracture