Cargando…

Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model

OBJECTIVE: The Achilles tendon (AT) is the most frequently ruptured in the human body. Literature describing different immobilization methods' impact on tendon healing after AT repair is lacking. We compare plaster cast, splint, and K‐wire to determine which is the most stable and has the fewes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tianliang, Wu, Wenjie, Gu, Jiaxiang, Hou, Ruixing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13860
_version_ 1785130501281939456
author Wang, Tianliang
Wu, Wenjie
Gu, Jiaxiang
Hou, Ruixing
author_facet Wang, Tianliang
Wu, Wenjie
Gu, Jiaxiang
Hou, Ruixing
author_sort Wang, Tianliang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Achilles tendon (AT) is the most frequently ruptured in the human body. Literature describing different immobilization methods' impact on tendon healing after AT repair is lacking. We compare plaster cast, splint, and K‐wire to determine which is the most stable and has the fewest complications. METHODS: Sixty rats aged 5–6 months were selected to establish Achilles tendon injury in two hind legs model. After suturing the ends of the AT together with a modified “Kessler” method (Prolene 5–0). The skin incision was interrupted and sutured with 1–0 thread. Rats were divided into three immobilization methods (plaster cast group, splint group, and K‐wire group). In plaster cast group, the hind leg was cast with plaster in the extended position of the hip and knee joints, and the ankle joint was at 150°. Splint and K‐wire group used splints and 0.8‐mm K‐wires, separately. The fixed period was 4 weeks. The incidence of stability and complications (death, necrosis of the legs, necrosis of the skin, and incisional infection) were recorded. Differences were detected using the chi‐square test. RESULTS: Within 4 weeks observation, K‐wires showed better stability (90%) compared with the other two ways (40% in plaster cast group, 65% in splint group; p < 0.05). Rats immobilized with K‐wires (10%) suffered significantly lower complications compared with plaster cast and splint group (15%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: K‐wire has better stability, lower complication rate than other methods. Immobilization with K‐wire may be a promising tool in future clinical Achilles tendon rupture applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10622275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106222752023-11-04 Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model Wang, Tianliang Wu, Wenjie Gu, Jiaxiang Hou, Ruixing Orthop Surg Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The Achilles tendon (AT) is the most frequently ruptured in the human body. Literature describing different immobilization methods' impact on tendon healing after AT repair is lacking. We compare plaster cast, splint, and K‐wire to determine which is the most stable and has the fewest complications. METHODS: Sixty rats aged 5–6 months were selected to establish Achilles tendon injury in two hind legs model. After suturing the ends of the AT together with a modified “Kessler” method (Prolene 5–0). The skin incision was interrupted and sutured with 1–0 thread. Rats were divided into three immobilization methods (plaster cast group, splint group, and K‐wire group). In plaster cast group, the hind leg was cast with plaster in the extended position of the hip and knee joints, and the ankle joint was at 150°. Splint and K‐wire group used splints and 0.8‐mm K‐wires, separately. The fixed period was 4 weeks. The incidence of stability and complications (death, necrosis of the legs, necrosis of the skin, and incisional infection) were recorded. Differences were detected using the chi‐square test. RESULTS: Within 4 weeks observation, K‐wires showed better stability (90%) compared with the other two ways (40% in plaster cast group, 65% in splint group; p < 0.05). Rats immobilized with K‐wires (10%) suffered significantly lower complications compared with plaster cast and splint group (15%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: K‐wire has better stability, lower complication rate than other methods. Immobilization with K‐wire may be a promising tool in future clinical Achilles tendon rupture applications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10622275/ /pubmed/37712211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13860 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wang, Tianliang
Wu, Wenjie
Gu, Jiaxiang
Hou, Ruixing
Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title_full Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title_fullStr Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title_full_unstemmed Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title_short Methods of Immobilization after Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Comparative Study in Rat Model
title_sort methods of immobilization after achilles tendon rupture repair: a comparative study in rat model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13860
work_keys_str_mv AT wangtianliang methodsofimmobilizationafterachillestendonrupturerepairacomparativestudyinratmodel
AT wuwenjie methodsofimmobilizationafterachillestendonrupturerepairacomparativestudyinratmodel
AT gujiaxiang methodsofimmobilizationafterachillestendonrupturerepairacomparativestudyinratmodel
AT houruixing methodsofimmobilizationafterachillestendonrupturerepairacomparativestudyinratmodel