Cargando…

Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland

BACKGROUND: In Germany, newborn screening (NGS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was introduced on 1 September 2016. There is no legally required follow-up of abnormal screening findings, so the exact number of final diagnoses is not known. Two data sources can support the evaluation of the cystic fibrosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nährlich, Lutz, Brockow, Inken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03778-1
_version_ 1785130520339808256
author Nährlich, Lutz
Brockow, Inken
author_facet Nährlich, Lutz
Brockow, Inken
author_sort Nährlich, Lutz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Germany, newborn screening (NGS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was introduced on 1 September 2016. There is no legally required follow-up of abnormal screening findings, so the exact number of final diagnoses is not known. Two data sources can support the evaluation of the cystic fibrosis screening: the German Society for Newborn Screening (DGNS) collects the results of NGS and confirmatory testing for quality assurance and the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry (DMR) collects diagnostic frequencies. The aim of this manuscript is to compare the data from the DGNS and the DMR and to present limitations and strengths of each data source. METHODS: Data from the DGNS (data as of 14 April 2023) and the DMR (data as of 12 April 2023) for children born between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed with regard to the frequencies of CF, number of patients with CF diagnosed after false-negative screening results, and ratio of CF to cases with positive cystic fibrosis screening and inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID). RESULTS: The DGNS has 767 datasets of newborns with CF/CFSPID and the DMR has 910 confirmed cases of CF/CFSPID. A false-negative screening was reported by the DGNS for 37/767 (4.8%) and by the DMR for 49/910 (5.4%). The ratio of CF to CFSPID is 17.4:1 (DGNS, 2017–2020) and 28.1:1 (DMR), respectively. DISCUSSION: The DGNS and the DMR, each with different strengths in the documentation of screening (DGNS) and diagnostic data (DMR), provide important clues for the number of newly diagnosed cystic fibrosis patients after the introduction of NGS. Legal requirements for tracking those screened, recording all children with CF, and exchanging data between the DGNS and DMR could improve evaluation in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10622368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106223682023-11-04 Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland Nährlich, Lutz Brockow, Inken Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Leitthema BACKGROUND: In Germany, newborn screening (NGS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was introduced on 1 September 2016. There is no legally required follow-up of abnormal screening findings, so the exact number of final diagnoses is not known. Two data sources can support the evaluation of the cystic fibrosis screening: the German Society for Newborn Screening (DGNS) collects the results of NGS and confirmatory testing for quality assurance and the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry (DMR) collects diagnostic frequencies. The aim of this manuscript is to compare the data from the DGNS and the DMR and to present limitations and strengths of each data source. METHODS: Data from the DGNS (data as of 14 April 2023) and the DMR (data as of 12 April 2023) for children born between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed with regard to the frequencies of CF, number of patients with CF diagnosed after false-negative screening results, and ratio of CF to cases with positive cystic fibrosis screening and inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID). RESULTS: The DGNS has 767 datasets of newborns with CF/CFSPID and the DMR has 910 confirmed cases of CF/CFSPID. A false-negative screening was reported by the DGNS for 37/767 (4.8%) and by the DMR for 49/910 (5.4%). The ratio of CF to CFSPID is 17.4:1 (DGNS, 2017–2020) and 28.1:1 (DMR), respectively. DISCUSSION: The DGNS and the DMR, each with different strengths in the documentation of screening (DGNS) and diagnostic data (DMR), provide important clues for the number of newly diagnosed cystic fibrosis patients after the introduction of NGS. Legal requirements for tracking those screened, recording all children with CF, and exchanging data between the DGNS and DMR could improve evaluation in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10622368/ /pubmed/37831094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03778-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Leitthema
Nährlich, Lutz
Brockow, Inken
Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title_full Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title_fullStr Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title_full_unstemmed Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title_short Vergleich von Diagnosedaten nach der Einführung des Mukoviszidosescreenings bei Neugeborenen in Deutschland
title_sort vergleich von diagnosedaten nach der einführung des mukoviszidosescreenings bei neugeborenen in deutschland
topic Leitthema
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03778-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nahrlichlutz vergleichvondiagnosedatennachdereinfuhrungdesmukoviszidosescreeningsbeineugeborenenindeutschland
AT brockowinken vergleichvondiagnosedatennachdereinfuhrungdesmukoviszidosescreeningsbeineugeborenenindeutschland