Cargando…

Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro

For restoration of extensively damaged teeth preprosthetic treatment measures are necessary. Crown lengthening and extrusion affect the prospective crown-root ratio (CRR). The subject of this in vitro study was to compute CRRs for both treatment approaches. 120 human maxillary central extracted inci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruhnke, Maria, Voß, Isabelle, Sterzenbach, Guido, Beuer, Florian, Naumann, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46354-y
_version_ 1785130557805428736
author Bruhnke, Maria
Voß, Isabelle
Sterzenbach, Guido
Beuer, Florian
Naumann, Michael
author_facet Bruhnke, Maria
Voß, Isabelle
Sterzenbach, Guido
Beuer, Florian
Naumann, Michael
author_sort Bruhnke, Maria
collection PubMed
description For restoration of extensively damaged teeth preprosthetic treatment measures are necessary. Crown lengthening and extrusion affect the prospective crown-root ratio (CRR). The subject of this in vitro study was to compute CRRs for both treatment approaches. 120 human maxillary central extracted incisors were measured. Measurements were calculated for five treatment groups: C (control), E-2 mm (extrusion of 2 mm), E-4 mm (extrusion of 4 mm), CL-2 mm (crown lengthening of 2 mm), and CL-4 mm (crown lengthening of 4 mm). Tooth (TL), root (RL), and crown lengths (CL) were measured from mesial (m) and facial (f) cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and respective anatomic (CRR) and effective crown-root ratios (eCRR) were calculated. Following CRR values were computed for C: CRR-m = 0.4 ± 0.1, CRR-f = 0.7 ± 0.1. All crown-root ratios were lower (more favourable) for extrusion compared to crown lengthening (p < 0.001). ECRRs were higher than anatomic CRRs. CRR at mesial CEJ was significantly lower than CRR with facial CEJ as reference (p < 0.001). Mesial measurement-based calculations of CRR typically based on radiographic images should be interpreted with caution as they underestimate the eCRR. CRR can be expected as lower, i.e. more favourable, when teeth are extruded than crown lengthened.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10622524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106225242023-11-04 Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro Bruhnke, Maria Voß, Isabelle Sterzenbach, Guido Beuer, Florian Naumann, Michael Sci Rep Article For restoration of extensively damaged teeth preprosthetic treatment measures are necessary. Crown lengthening and extrusion affect the prospective crown-root ratio (CRR). The subject of this in vitro study was to compute CRRs for both treatment approaches. 120 human maxillary central extracted incisors were measured. Measurements were calculated for five treatment groups: C (control), E-2 mm (extrusion of 2 mm), E-4 mm (extrusion of 4 mm), CL-2 mm (crown lengthening of 2 mm), and CL-4 mm (crown lengthening of 4 mm). Tooth (TL), root (RL), and crown lengths (CL) were measured from mesial (m) and facial (f) cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and respective anatomic (CRR) and effective crown-root ratios (eCRR) were calculated. Following CRR values were computed for C: CRR-m = 0.4 ± 0.1, CRR-f = 0.7 ± 0.1. All crown-root ratios were lower (more favourable) for extrusion compared to crown lengthening (p < 0.001). ECRRs were higher than anatomic CRRs. CRR at mesial CEJ was significantly lower than CRR with facial CEJ as reference (p < 0.001). Mesial measurement-based calculations of CRR typically based on radiographic images should be interpreted with caution as they underestimate the eCRR. CRR can be expected as lower, i.e. more favourable, when teeth are extruded than crown lengthened. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10622524/ /pubmed/37919362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46354-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bruhnke, Maria
Voß, Isabelle
Sterzenbach, Guido
Beuer, Florian
Naumann, Michael
Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title_full Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title_fullStr Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title_short Evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
title_sort evaluating the prospective crown-root ratio after extrusion and crown lengthening procedures in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46354-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bruhnkemaria evaluatingtheprospectivecrownrootratioafterextrusionandcrownlengtheningproceduresinvitro
AT voßisabelle evaluatingtheprospectivecrownrootratioafterextrusionandcrownlengtheningproceduresinvitro
AT sterzenbachguido evaluatingtheprospectivecrownrootratioafterextrusionandcrownlengtheningproceduresinvitro
AT beuerflorian evaluatingtheprospectivecrownrootratioafterextrusionandcrownlengtheningproceduresinvitro
AT naumannmichael evaluatingtheprospectivecrownrootratioafterextrusionandcrownlengtheningproceduresinvitro