Cargando…

A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device

The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the body composition results for each impedance device and use them as primary data for body composition research. Total of 58 participants, including 24 men and 34 women, were recruited. The correlation was analyzed by measuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jong-Baek, Sung, Bong-Ju, Ko, Byoung-Goo, Cho, Eun-Hyung, Seo, Tae-Beom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928832
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.2346404.202
_version_ 1785130645877424128
author Lee, Jong-Baek
Sung, Bong-Ju
Ko, Byoung-Goo
Cho, Eun-Hyung
Seo, Tae-Beom
author_facet Lee, Jong-Baek
Sung, Bong-Ju
Ko, Byoung-Goo
Cho, Eun-Hyung
Seo, Tae-Beom
author_sort Lee, Jong-Baek
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the body composition results for each impedance device and use them as primary data for body composition research. Total of 58 participants, including 24 men and 34 women, were recruited. The correlation was analyzed by measuring two repetitive measurements for each device. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) equipment was used as reference equipment for body composition research. All data were analyzed as IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 25.0, and the validity and reliability were estimated by calculating the timely correlation coefficient. As a result of the study, repeated measurements of the measuring instrument showed high reliability by gender and age, especially in the child age group, with relatively higher reliability than those in their 50s or older. In the validity analysis between DEXA, in the case of the male group, the validity of the fat mass amount was relatively higher than the body fat amount and body fat rate. In the case of the women’s group, the validity of the body fat amount and body fat rate was relatively higher than that of the fat mass amount. The company B had the highest validity for body fat rate and body fat amount in both men and women. However, the validity for men’s fat mass amount was the lowest. In subsequent studies, it is believed that studies that have expanded the population further and studies targeting special groups such as athletes should be conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10622934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106229342023-11-04 A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device Lee, Jong-Baek Sung, Bong-Ju Ko, Byoung-Goo Cho, Eun-Hyung Seo, Tae-Beom J Exerc Rehabil Original Article The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the body composition results for each impedance device and use them as primary data for body composition research. Total of 58 participants, including 24 men and 34 women, were recruited. The correlation was analyzed by measuring two repetitive measurements for each device. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) equipment was used as reference equipment for body composition research. All data were analyzed as IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 25.0, and the validity and reliability were estimated by calculating the timely correlation coefficient. As a result of the study, repeated measurements of the measuring instrument showed high reliability by gender and age, especially in the child age group, with relatively higher reliability than those in their 50s or older. In the validity analysis between DEXA, in the case of the male group, the validity of the fat mass amount was relatively higher than the body fat amount and body fat rate. In the case of the women’s group, the validity of the body fat amount and body fat rate was relatively higher than that of the fat mass amount. The company B had the highest validity for body fat rate and body fat amount in both men and women. However, the validity for men’s fat mass amount was the lowest. In subsequent studies, it is believed that studies that have expanded the population further and studies targeting special groups such as athletes should be conducted. Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10622934/ /pubmed/37928832 http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.2346404.202 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jong-Baek
Sung, Bong-Ju
Ko, Byoung-Goo
Cho, Eun-Hyung
Seo, Tae-Beom
A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title_full A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title_fullStr A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title_short A comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
title_sort comparative study on the reliability and validity of body composition results by impedance method measurement device
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928832
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.2346404.202
work_keys_str_mv AT leejongbaek acomparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT sungbongju acomparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT kobyounggoo acomparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT choeunhyung acomparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT seotaebeom acomparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT leejongbaek comparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT sungbongju comparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT kobyounggoo comparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT choeunhyung comparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice
AT seotaebeom comparativestudyonthereliabilityandvalidityofbodycompositionresultsbyimpedancemethodmeasurementdevice