Cargando…
A health sciences researcher’s experience of manuscript review comments, 2020–2022
BACKGROUND: Peer review frequently improves a manuscript, but authors may consider some reviewer feedback negative, inappropriate or unclear. This study aims to summarise and analyse review comments received by authors. METHODS: This longitudinal study included all submissions of which the researche...
Autor principal: | Joubert, Gina |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5753 |
Ejemplares similares
-
2022 Year in Review: Countdown of the Best Manuscripts in 2022
por: Grapsa, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers 2020
por: Mihaltan, Florin Dumitru
Publicado: (2021) -
Electromagnetic Interference in Implantable Rhythm Devices: Comment
por: Ramachandran, PV
Publicado: (2002) -
Arrhythmia Diagnosis Following an ICD Shock: Comment
por: Levine, Pual A
Publicado: (2002) -
The science of truth
por: Fajardo, A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)