Cargando…
Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among univ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928652 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923 |
_version_ | 1785130779692498944 |
---|---|
author | Agtuahene, Mercy A. Quartey, Jonathan Kwakye, Samuel |
author_facet | Agtuahene, Mercy A. Quartey, Jonathan Kwakye, Samuel |
author_sort | Agtuahene, Mercy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. METHOD: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m(2) (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). CONCLUSION: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10623635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106236352023-11-04 Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength Agtuahene, Mercy A. Quartey, Jonathan Kwakye, Samuel S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. METHOD: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m(2) (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). CONCLUSION: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy. AOSIS 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10623635/ /pubmed/37928652 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Agtuahene, Mercy A. Quartey, Jonathan Kwakye, Samuel Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title | Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title_full | Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title_fullStr | Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title_short | Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
title_sort | influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928652 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agtuahenemercya influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength AT quarteyjonathan influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength AT kwakyesamuel influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength |