Cargando…

Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength

BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among univ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agtuahene, Mercy A., Quartey, Jonathan, Kwakye, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928652
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
_version_ 1785130779692498944
author Agtuahene, Mercy A.
Quartey, Jonathan
Kwakye, Samuel
author_facet Agtuahene, Mercy A.
Quartey, Jonathan
Kwakye, Samuel
author_sort Agtuahene, Mercy A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. METHOD: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m(2) (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). CONCLUSION: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10623635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106236352023-11-04 Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength Agtuahene, Mercy A. Quartey, Jonathan Kwakye, Samuel S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana. METHOD: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m(2) (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982). CONCLUSION: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy. AOSIS 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10623635/ /pubmed/37928652 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Agtuahene, Mercy A.
Quartey, Jonathan
Kwakye, Samuel
Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title_full Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title_fullStr Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title_full_unstemmed Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title_short Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
title_sort influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928652
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
work_keys_str_mv AT agtuahenemercya influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength
AT quarteyjonathan influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength
AT kwakyesamuel influenceofhanddominancegenderandbodymassindexonhandgripstrength