Cargando…

Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children

BACKGROUND: Scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma (SRL) in children is relatively rare and its clinical symptoms are usually difficult to distinguish from other conditions such as hydrocele and incarcerated inguinal oblique hernia. This study aimed to explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wei, Mo, Jiayu, Tan, Kezhe, Chen, Xingzhao, Xu, WeiJue, Liu, JiangBin, Lv, Zhibao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37924010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04380-9
_version_ 1785130805810429952
author Wu, Wei
Mo, Jiayu
Tan, Kezhe
Chen, Xingzhao
Xu, WeiJue
Liu, JiangBin
Lv, Zhibao
author_facet Wu, Wei
Mo, Jiayu
Tan, Kezhe
Chen, Xingzhao
Xu, WeiJue
Liu, JiangBin
Lv, Zhibao
author_sort Wu, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma (SRL) in children is relatively rare and its clinical symptoms are usually difficult to distinguish from other conditions such as hydrocele and incarcerated inguinal oblique hernia. This study aimed to explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment of abdominal scrotal lymphangioma in children, and thus, to increase our understandings of this disease in clinical practice. METHOD: This study enrolled nine boys, aged 1–10, who were admitted to Shanghai Children’s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 and who were finally confirmed with lymphangioma in the inguinal area. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of these children were analyzed retrospectively. The length of diagnostic process ranged from 3 weeks to 20 months. We also reviewed other cases of initially misdiagnosed cases of SRL in English publications from 2000 to 2022. RESULTS: The nine cases were misdiagnosed as hydrocele, hematoma, or inguinal hernia. Three patients received intracystic injection of bleomycin, three underwent laparoscopic mass resection, and three underwent resection of the inguinal lymphangioma under direct vision. Postoperative pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed the diagnosis of benign cystic lesions and lymphangioma. Meanwhile, among the 14 cases of SRL in literature review, eight were misdiagnosed. Six were initially diagnosed as hydrocele, one as inguinal oblique hernia, and one as testicular tumor, all of which underwent ultrasonography scans. All cases were confirmed as lymphangioma after pathological examination. CONCLUSION: The non-specific clinical manifestations may contribute to the misdiagnosis of scrotal masses in children. A detailed and accurate medical history, careful physical examination, and imaging findings are important factors contributing to the preoperative differential diagnosis of scrotal lumps in children, but the final diagnosis is based on pathological examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10623770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106237702023-11-04 Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children Wu, Wei Mo, Jiayu Tan, Kezhe Chen, Xingzhao Xu, WeiJue Liu, JiangBin Lv, Zhibao BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma (SRL) in children is relatively rare and its clinical symptoms are usually difficult to distinguish from other conditions such as hydrocele and incarcerated inguinal oblique hernia. This study aimed to explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment of abdominal scrotal lymphangioma in children, and thus, to increase our understandings of this disease in clinical practice. METHOD: This study enrolled nine boys, aged 1–10, who were admitted to Shanghai Children’s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 and who were finally confirmed with lymphangioma in the inguinal area. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of these children were analyzed retrospectively. The length of diagnostic process ranged from 3 weeks to 20 months. We also reviewed other cases of initially misdiagnosed cases of SRL in English publications from 2000 to 2022. RESULTS: The nine cases were misdiagnosed as hydrocele, hematoma, or inguinal hernia. Three patients received intracystic injection of bleomycin, three underwent laparoscopic mass resection, and three underwent resection of the inguinal lymphangioma under direct vision. Postoperative pathological analysis of the surgical specimens confirmed the diagnosis of benign cystic lesions and lymphangioma. Meanwhile, among the 14 cases of SRL in literature review, eight were misdiagnosed. Six were initially diagnosed as hydrocele, one as inguinal oblique hernia, and one as testicular tumor, all of which underwent ultrasonography scans. All cases were confirmed as lymphangioma after pathological examination. CONCLUSION: The non-specific clinical manifestations may contribute to the misdiagnosis of scrotal masses in children. A detailed and accurate medical history, careful physical examination, and imaging findings are important factors contributing to the preoperative differential diagnosis of scrotal lumps in children, but the final diagnosis is based on pathological examination. BioMed Central 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10623770/ /pubmed/37924010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04380-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Wei
Mo, Jiayu
Tan, Kezhe
Chen, Xingzhao
Xu, WeiJue
Liu, JiangBin
Lv, Zhibao
Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title_full Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title_fullStr Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title_full_unstemmed Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title_short Misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
title_sort misdiagnosis of scrotal and retroperitoneal lymphangioma in children
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37924010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04380-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wuwei misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT mojiayu misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT tankezhe misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT chenxingzhao misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT xuweijue misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT liujiangbin misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren
AT lvzhibao misdiagnosisofscrotalandretroperitoneallymphangiomainchildren